TY - JOUR
T1 - From Absences to Emergences:
T2 - Foregrounding traditional and Indigenous climate change adaptation knowledges and practices from Fiji, Vietnam and the Philippines
AU - See, Justin
AU - Permejo Cuaton, Ginbert
AU - Placino, Pryor
AU - Vunibola, Suliasi
AU - do Thi, Huang
AU - Dombroski, Kelly
AU - Mckinnon, Katharine
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the organisers and participants of the Liviana II Online Conference for the opportunity to connect and share our current research on climate change adaptation. We are also grateful to the members of Community Economies Research Network (CERN) and CERN-Asia for the valuable comments and feedback. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the helpful feedback on an earlier draft. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - The differential impacts of climate change have highlighted the need to implement fit-for-purpose interventions that are reflective of the needs of vulnerable communities. However, adaptation projects tend to favour technocratic, market-driven, and Eurocentric approaches that inadvertently disregard the place-based and contextual adaptation strategies of many communities in the Global South. The paper aims to decolonise climate change adaptation guided by the critical tenets of ‘Decolonising Climate Adaptation Scholarship’ (DCAS). It presents empirical case studies from Fiji, Vietnam, and the Philippines and reveals the different ways that Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) and strategies are devalued and suppressed by modernist and developmentalist approaches to climate adaptation. The paper then foregrounds some of the adaptive techniques that resist and remain, or have been re-worked in hybrid ways with ILK. Ultimately, this paper combats the delegitimisation of ILK by mainstream climate change adaptation scholarship and highlights the need for awareness and openness to other forms of knowing and being.
AB - The differential impacts of climate change have highlighted the need to implement fit-for-purpose interventions that are reflective of the needs of vulnerable communities. However, adaptation projects tend to favour technocratic, market-driven, and Eurocentric approaches that inadvertently disregard the place-based and contextual adaptation strategies of many communities in the Global South. The paper aims to decolonise climate change adaptation guided by the critical tenets of ‘Decolonising Climate Adaptation Scholarship’ (DCAS). It presents empirical case studies from Fiji, Vietnam, and the Philippines and reveals the different ways that Indigenous and local knowledge (ILK) and strategies are devalued and suppressed by modernist and developmentalist approaches to climate adaptation. The paper then foregrounds some of the adaptive techniques that resist and remain, or have been re-worked in hybrid ways with ILK. Ultimately, this paper combats the delegitimisation of ILK by mainstream climate change adaptation scholarship and highlights the need for awareness and openness to other forms of knowing and being.
KW - Climate change
KW - Climate Change Adaptation
KW - decolonising
KW - indigenous knowledge
KW - Global south
KW - Decolonising climate and adaptation scholarship (DCAS)
KW - Climate change adaptation
KW - Global South
KW - Indigenous and local knowledge
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180927085&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106503
DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106503
M3 - Article
SN - 0305-750X
VL - 176
SP - 1
EP - 13
JO - World Development
JF - World Development
M1 - 106503
ER -