From global forests to local politics

unwrapping the boundaries within forest certification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Following decades of concern about unsustainable forest management practices, forest certification was developed in the 1990s to become an influential global forest governance approach. 25 years since its inception, forest certification is under attack, with questions raised regarding its legitimacy and efficacy in driving sustainable forest management. Recognising forest certification as a complex and dynamic boundary-spanning regime, understanding the impact of diverse boundaries on forest certification is essential to address escalating conflict and enable the improved design of forest certification systems. This paper empirically explores the implementation of a forest certification regime using a Forest Stewardship Certification pesticide derogation process. The case shows how competing boundaries place considerable pressure on the effectiveness and sustainability of the global certification regime. Embedded local interests and contested institutional claims hardened the boundaries between interests across the policy regime, weakening connections and hence weakening opportunities to find common solutions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529-547
Number of pages19
JournalAustralian Journal of Political Science
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

local politics
certification
regime
management
legitimacy
sustainability
governance

Cite this

@article{8086000c35594960a32e9515e313ef71,
title = "From global forests to local politics: unwrapping the boundaries within forest certification",
abstract = "Following decades of concern about unsustainable forest management practices, forest certification was developed in the 1990s to become an influential global forest governance approach. 25 years since its inception, forest certification is under attack, with questions raised regarding its legitimacy and efficacy in driving sustainable forest management. Recognising forest certification as a complex and dynamic boundary-spanning regime, understanding the impact of diverse boundaries on forest certification is essential to address escalating conflict and enable the improved design of forest certification systems. This paper empirically explores the implementation of a forest certification regime using a Forest Stewardship Certification pesticide derogation process. The case shows how competing boundaries place considerable pressure on the effectiveness and sustainability of the global certification regime. Embedded local interests and contested institutional claims hardened the boundaries between interests across the policy regime, weakening connections and hence weakening opportunities to find common solutions.",
keywords = "Boundary spanning, Forest Stewardship Council, policy regime, stakeholder engagement, sustainable forest management",
author = "Lain Dare",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10361146.2018.1517297",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "529--547",
journal = "Australian Journal of Political Science",
issn = "1036-1146",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

From global forests to local politics : unwrapping the boundaries within forest certification. / Dare, Lain.

In: Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 53, No. 4, 02.10.2018, p. 529-547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - From global forests to local politics

T2 - unwrapping the boundaries within forest certification

AU - Dare, Lain

PY - 2018/10/2

Y1 - 2018/10/2

N2 - Following decades of concern about unsustainable forest management practices, forest certification was developed in the 1990s to become an influential global forest governance approach. 25 years since its inception, forest certification is under attack, with questions raised regarding its legitimacy and efficacy in driving sustainable forest management. Recognising forest certification as a complex and dynamic boundary-spanning regime, understanding the impact of diverse boundaries on forest certification is essential to address escalating conflict and enable the improved design of forest certification systems. This paper empirically explores the implementation of a forest certification regime using a Forest Stewardship Certification pesticide derogation process. The case shows how competing boundaries place considerable pressure on the effectiveness and sustainability of the global certification regime. Embedded local interests and contested institutional claims hardened the boundaries between interests across the policy regime, weakening connections and hence weakening opportunities to find common solutions.

AB - Following decades of concern about unsustainable forest management practices, forest certification was developed in the 1990s to become an influential global forest governance approach. 25 years since its inception, forest certification is under attack, with questions raised regarding its legitimacy and efficacy in driving sustainable forest management. Recognising forest certification as a complex and dynamic boundary-spanning regime, understanding the impact of diverse boundaries on forest certification is essential to address escalating conflict and enable the improved design of forest certification systems. This paper empirically explores the implementation of a forest certification regime using a Forest Stewardship Certification pesticide derogation process. The case shows how competing boundaries place considerable pressure on the effectiveness and sustainability of the global certification regime. Embedded local interests and contested institutional claims hardened the boundaries between interests across the policy regime, weakening connections and hence weakening opportunities to find common solutions.

KW - Boundary spanning

KW - Forest Stewardship Council

KW - policy regime

KW - stakeholder engagement

KW - sustainable forest management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053430804&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10361146.2018.1517297

DO - 10.1080/10361146.2018.1517297

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 529

EP - 547

JO - Australian Journal of Political Science

JF - Australian Journal of Political Science

SN - 1036-1146

IS - 4

ER -