From polarisation to pluralisation: A deliberative approach to illiberal cultures

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article outlines the advantages of a deliberative democratic approach to ‘illiberal cultures’ and polarised debates in contemporary multicultural societies. In doing so, it draws on the insights of agonistic pluralism, and shows that a cross-fertilisation between certain variants of deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism is both possible and desirable. Focusing particularly on the works of John Dryzek and William Connolly, the article highlights three normative criteria for polities to aspire to, if not fully achieve, to democratise the debates over illiberal cultural practices. These include: i) an expanded notion of inclusion underpinned by the principle of agonistic respect; ii) the presence of spaces that facilitate interaction and contestation among the multiple publics of a culturally contested issue; and iii) the generation of concrete outcomes based on discursive contestation among multiple publics. To illustrate how approximation to these criteria might look in practice, the article focuses on the example of the honour-killing debate in Britain.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages114-127
    Number of pages14
    JournalInternational Political Science Review
    Volume38
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

    Fingerprint

    pluralism
    polarization
    deliberative democracy
    multicultural society
    honor
    respect
    inclusion
    interaction

    Cite this

    @article{ae6cc2c3b55c48718609314bc4b0d884,
    title = "From polarisation to pluralisation: A deliberative approach to illiberal cultures",
    abstract = "This article outlines the advantages of a deliberative democratic approach to ‘illiberal cultures’ and polarised debates in contemporary multicultural societies. In doing so, it draws on the insights of agonistic pluralism, and shows that a cross-fertilisation between certain variants of deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism is both possible and desirable. Focusing particularly on the works of John Dryzek and William Connolly, the article highlights three normative criteria for polities to aspire to, if not fully achieve, to democratise the debates over illiberal cultural practices. These include: i) an expanded notion of inclusion underpinned by the principle of agonistic respect; ii) the presence of spaces that facilitate interaction and contestation among the multiple publics of a culturally contested issue; and iii) the generation of concrete outcomes based on discursive contestation among multiple publics. To illustrate how approximation to these criteria might look in practice, the article focuses on the example of the honour-killing debate in Britain.",
    keywords = "Agonism, Britain, deliberative democracy, honour killing, illiberal culture, polarisation",
    author = "Selen ERCAN",
    year = "2017",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0192512115619465",
    language = "English",
    volume = "38",
    pages = "114--127",
    journal = "International Political Science Review",
    issn = "0192-5121",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    From polarisation to pluralisation : A deliberative approach to illiberal cultures. / ERCAN, Selen.

    In: International Political Science Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 114-127.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - From polarisation to pluralisation

    T2 - International Political Science Review

    AU - ERCAN, Selen

    PY - 2017/1/1

    Y1 - 2017/1/1

    N2 - This article outlines the advantages of a deliberative democratic approach to ‘illiberal cultures’ and polarised debates in contemporary multicultural societies. In doing so, it draws on the insights of agonistic pluralism, and shows that a cross-fertilisation between certain variants of deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism is both possible and desirable. Focusing particularly on the works of John Dryzek and William Connolly, the article highlights three normative criteria for polities to aspire to, if not fully achieve, to democratise the debates over illiberal cultural practices. These include: i) an expanded notion of inclusion underpinned by the principle of agonistic respect; ii) the presence of spaces that facilitate interaction and contestation among the multiple publics of a culturally contested issue; and iii) the generation of concrete outcomes based on discursive contestation among multiple publics. To illustrate how approximation to these criteria might look in practice, the article focuses on the example of the honour-killing debate in Britain.

    AB - This article outlines the advantages of a deliberative democratic approach to ‘illiberal cultures’ and polarised debates in contemporary multicultural societies. In doing so, it draws on the insights of agonistic pluralism, and shows that a cross-fertilisation between certain variants of deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism is both possible and desirable. Focusing particularly on the works of John Dryzek and William Connolly, the article highlights three normative criteria for polities to aspire to, if not fully achieve, to democratise the debates over illiberal cultural practices. These include: i) an expanded notion of inclusion underpinned by the principle of agonistic respect; ii) the presence of spaces that facilitate interaction and contestation among the multiple publics of a culturally contested issue; and iii) the generation of concrete outcomes based on discursive contestation among multiple publics. To illustrate how approximation to these criteria might look in practice, the article focuses on the example of the honour-killing debate in Britain.

    KW - Agonism

    KW - Britain

    KW - deliberative democracy

    KW - honour killing

    KW - illiberal culture

    KW - polarisation

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011604937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0192512115619465

    DO - 10.1177/0192512115619465

    M3 - Article

    VL - 38

    SP - 114

    EP - 127

    JO - International Political Science Review

    JF - International Political Science Review

    SN - 0192-5121

    IS - 1

    ER -