From polarisation to pluralisation

A deliberative approach to illiberal cultures

Selen ERCAN

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article outlines the advantages of a deliberative democratic approach to ‘illiberal cultures’ and polarised debates in contemporary multicultural societies. In doing so, it draws on the insights of agonistic pluralism, and shows that a cross-fertilisation between certain variants of deliberative democracy and agonistic pluralism is both possible and desirable. Focusing particularly on the works of John Dryzek and William Connolly, the article highlights three normative criteria for polities to aspire to, if not fully achieve, to democratise the debates over illiberal cultural practices. These include: i) an expanded notion of inclusion underpinned by the principle of agonistic respect; ii) the presence of spaces that facilitate interaction and contestation among the multiple publics of a culturally contested issue; and iii) the generation of concrete outcomes based on discursive contestation among multiple publics. To illustrate how approximation to these criteria might look in practice, the article focuses on the example of the honour-killing debate in Britain.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)114-127
    Number of pages14
    JournalInternational Political Science Review
    Volume38
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

      Fingerprint

    Cite this