Gender perspectives on spatial tasks in a national assessment

A secondary data analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Most large-scale summative assessments present results in terms of cumulative scores. Although such descriptions can provide insights into general trends over time, they do not provide detail of how students solved the tasks. Less restrictive access to raw data from these summative assessments has occurred in recent years, resulting in opportunities for data to be analysed at a deeper level. This article examines longitudinal data on students’ performance on spatial numeracy tasks, with a specific focus on gender differences. Using an adapted Knowledge Discovery in Data (KDD) research design, data from a nationally-representative cohort were analysed over a five-year period. Results highlighted distinct differences in how males and females processed many of the spatial tasks. The opportunity to analyse summative assessment instruments at a deeper level offers more scope for worthwhile curriculum and classroom implications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)199-216
Number of pages18
JournalResearch in Mathematics Education
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2017

Fingerprint

secondary analysis
Data analysis
data analysis
gender
Gender Differences
Knowledge Discovery
Longitudinal Data
research planning
gender-specific factors
Distinct
student
Gender
curriculum
classroom
trend
knowledge
performance

Cite this

@article{33873120fea14175a358274e85790039,
title = "Gender perspectives on spatial tasks in a national assessment: A secondary data analysis",
abstract = "Most large-scale summative assessments present results in terms of cumulative scores. Although such descriptions can provide insights into general trends over time, they do not provide detail of how students solved the tasks. Less restrictive access to raw data from these summative assessments has occurred in recent years, resulting in opportunities for data to be analysed at a deeper level. This article examines longitudinal data on students’ performance on spatial numeracy tasks, with a specific focus on gender differences. Using an adapted Knowledge Discovery in Data (KDD) research design, data from a nationally-representative cohort were analysed over a five-year period. Results highlighted distinct differences in how males and females processed many of the spatial tasks. The opportunity to analyse summative assessment instruments at a deeper level offers more scope for worthwhile curriculum and classroom implications.",
keywords = "secondary data analysis, gender, spatial tasks, large-scale summative assessment",
author = "Tracy Logan and Tom Lowrie",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/14794802.2017.1334577",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "199--216",
journal = "Research in Mathematics Education",
issn = "1463-6441",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

Gender perspectives on spatial tasks in a national assessment : A secondary data analysis. / Logan, Tracy; Lowrie, Tom.

In: Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 19, No. 2, 01.08.2017, p. 199-216.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender perspectives on spatial tasks in a national assessment

T2 - A secondary data analysis

AU - Logan, Tracy

AU - Lowrie, Tom

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - Most large-scale summative assessments present results in terms of cumulative scores. Although such descriptions can provide insights into general trends over time, they do not provide detail of how students solved the tasks. Less restrictive access to raw data from these summative assessments has occurred in recent years, resulting in opportunities for data to be analysed at a deeper level. This article examines longitudinal data on students’ performance on spatial numeracy tasks, with a specific focus on gender differences. Using an adapted Knowledge Discovery in Data (KDD) research design, data from a nationally-representative cohort were analysed over a five-year period. Results highlighted distinct differences in how males and females processed many of the spatial tasks. The opportunity to analyse summative assessment instruments at a deeper level offers more scope for worthwhile curriculum and classroom implications.

AB - Most large-scale summative assessments present results in terms of cumulative scores. Although such descriptions can provide insights into general trends over time, they do not provide detail of how students solved the tasks. Less restrictive access to raw data from these summative assessments has occurred in recent years, resulting in opportunities for data to be analysed at a deeper level. This article examines longitudinal data on students’ performance on spatial numeracy tasks, with a specific focus on gender differences. Using an adapted Knowledge Discovery in Data (KDD) research design, data from a nationally-representative cohort were analysed over a five-year period. Results highlighted distinct differences in how males and females processed many of the spatial tasks. The opportunity to analyse summative assessment instruments at a deeper level offers more scope for worthwhile curriculum and classroom implications.

KW - secondary data analysis

KW - gender

KW - spatial tasks

KW - large-scale summative assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027010222&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14794802.2017.1334577

DO - 10.1080/14794802.2017.1334577

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 199

EP - 216

JO - Research in Mathematics Education

JF - Research in Mathematics Education

SN - 1463-6441

IS - 2

ER -