@article{58e7884f0bc94446bc337ea7559154ae,
title = "Gender, securitization and transit: Refugee women and the Journey to the EU",
abstract = "European Union (EU) Member States have cultivated the 'securitization of migration', crafting a legal framework that prevents irregular migrants, including asylum seekers, from arriving in the EU. As external and internal border controls are reinvigorated to achieve this aim, the experiences of asylum seekers beyond the EU border, in designated 'transit' countries, necessitate further inquiry. Concepts of 'transit' are shaped by government accounts of 'secondary migration' as illegitimate, and asylum seekers as a security threat warranting containment. Based on interviews with Somali refugee women who have travelled through North Africa to reach the southern EU Member State of Malta, this article traces the impact of the securitization of migration on women's experiences of 'transit'. Women's stories, historically neglected in the literature on migration, provide a lived account of securitization and the gendered ways 'functional border sites' operate beyond the EU, enlisting state and non-state actors in producing direct and structural violence. This article argues EU policy is blind to the lived realities of those who seek refugee protection in the EU, and urgently needs to address the structural contradictions exacerbating violence experienced by refugee women in transit.",
keywords = "Border control, Gender and irregular migration, Securitization of migration, Transit",
author = "Alison Gerard and Sharon Pickering",
note = "Funding Information: The detention centres in Libya were partly funded by the Italian Government (Brothers 2007), illustrating the functional mobility of the EU border (Weber 2006). Since the Revolution, Italy has restored bilateral cooperation with Libya on irregular migration and border control, although the terms of the agreements reached remain unclear. Reportedly, cooperation in several areas has been agreed, including the construction of health facilities for a detention centre (Statewatch 2012). Conditions in the Libyan detention centres have been criticized by many human rights groups as overcrowded, unhygienic and violent (AI 2010; HRW 2009c; JRS 2009). No healthcare is provided, there is minimal access to food and water, and ailments such as scabies, dermatitis and respiratory problems are endemic (JRS 2009). Hamood{\textquoteright}s (2006) study addressed the gendered nature of violence in Libya{\textquoteright}s detention centres, observing that female participants had been threatened with rape and both male and female detainees subjected to beatings. Syrad{\textquoteright}s narrative above suggests she was physically abused in a Libyan detention centre. Research by Amnesty International (2010) similarly found evidence of violence against women in detention. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author 2013.",
year = "2014",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jrs/fet019",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "338--359",
journal = "Journal of Refugee Studies",
issn = "0951-6328",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",
}