Abstract
Published data that describe the subjective well-being (SWB) of Indigenous
people across Australia are scarce. This study reports differences in the
SWB of 3 sample groups–mainstream Australian adults, Indigenous
adolescents, and non-Indigenous adolescents–in 5 geographic areas
classified by remoteness. Both groups of adolescents were participating in a
national program for disengaged youth. Consistent with results from
general population samples, the SWB for people living in rural centers was
higher than for those in either major cities or very remote areas. This
suggests that there may be an optimum size of community that acts as a
buffer to the well-being of both Indigenous and non-Indigenous adolescents
and adults. This may be achieved through greater community connection,
as well as having a reasonable level of amenities available. The results of
this study are likely relevant to Indigenous populations in other countries,
and the implications of these findings for service delivery are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 81-99 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Community Psychology |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2017 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Geographic differences in subjective wellbeing among Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australian adolescents and Adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver