Geographic distribution of eye‐care practitioners in Aotearoa/New Zealand: implications for future eye health workforce

Naoko Chapman, Nicola Anstice, Robert J. Jacobs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background
The New Zealand Ministry of Health provides funding for the delivery of health care across regions via 20 District Health Boards. Funding includes the subsidisation of therapeutic pharmaceutical agents/drugs. The distribution of optometrists and ophthalmologists across the regions was investigated to understand the accessibility of eye care in New Zealand. Changes made to the optometrists' scope of practice in 2005 and in 2014 increased the range of drugs that suitably qualified optometrists could prescribe. Therefore, the distribution of optometrists authorised to prescribe drugs and those not authorised to prescribe drugs was also investigated.

Methods
Information from the New Zealand Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians Board register and information from the Medical Council's website were used to create a database of ophthalmic practitioners and their locations. The χ2 goodness‐of‐fit test was carried out to determine whether the distribution of the number of practitioners across the regions was in proportion to the population of the regions.

Results
Ophthalmologists were distributed across the regions in proportion to the regional population size. However, optometrists were concentrated in Auckland and other regions with high populations. Optometrists authorised to prescribe drugs comprised over 74 per cent of optometrists and were the majority of optometrists in most regions. Many of the regions with populations less than 200,000 had high population‐to‐practitioner ratios, indicating that they may not have sufficient numbers of ophthalmic practitioners in order to provide for the ocular needs of the community.

Conclusion
Better distribution of the optometric workforce could make eye care more accessible in many regions of New Zealand.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages12
JournalClinical and Experimental Optometry
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Health Manpower
New Zealand
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Population
Optometrists
Health
Population Density
Databases
Delivery of Health Care

Cite this

@article{15d51f007122482aa78e79e6450ec5ba,
title = "Geographic distribution of eye‐care practitioners in Aotearoa/New Zealand: implications for future eye health workforce",
abstract = "BackgroundThe New Zealand Ministry of Health provides funding for the delivery of health care across regions via 20 District Health Boards. Funding includes the subsidisation of therapeutic pharmaceutical agents/drugs. The distribution of optometrists and ophthalmologists across the regions was investigated to understand the accessibility of eye care in New Zealand. Changes made to the optometrists' scope of practice in 2005 and in 2014 increased the range of drugs that suitably qualified optometrists could prescribe. Therefore, the distribution of optometrists authorised to prescribe drugs and those not authorised to prescribe drugs was also investigated.MethodsInformation from the New Zealand Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians Board register and information from the Medical Council's website were used to create a database of ophthalmic practitioners and their locations. The χ2 goodness‐of‐fit test was carried out to determine whether the distribution of the number of practitioners across the regions was in proportion to the population of the regions.ResultsOphthalmologists were distributed across the regions in proportion to the regional population size. However, optometrists were concentrated in Auckland and other regions with high populations. Optometrists authorised to prescribe drugs comprised over 74 per cent of optometrists and were the majority of optometrists in most regions. Many of the regions with populations less than 200,000 had high population‐to‐practitioner ratios, indicating that they may not have sufficient numbers of ophthalmic practitioners in order to provide for the ocular needs of the community.ConclusionBetter distribution of the optometric workforce could make eye care more accessible in many regions of New Zealand.",
keywords = "geographic distribution, ophthalmologists, optometrists, therapeutic pharmaceutical agents",
author = "Naoko Chapman and Nicola Anstice and Jacobs, {Robert J.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2019 Optometry Australia",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/cxo.12998",
language = "English",
pages = "1--11",
journal = "The Australasian journal of optometry",
issn = "0816-4622",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographic distribution of eye‐care practitioners in Aotearoa/New Zealand: implications for future eye health workforce

AU - Chapman, Naoko

AU - Anstice, Nicola

AU - Jacobs, Robert J.

N1 - © 2019 Optometry Australia

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - BackgroundThe New Zealand Ministry of Health provides funding for the delivery of health care across regions via 20 District Health Boards. Funding includes the subsidisation of therapeutic pharmaceutical agents/drugs. The distribution of optometrists and ophthalmologists across the regions was investigated to understand the accessibility of eye care in New Zealand. Changes made to the optometrists' scope of practice in 2005 and in 2014 increased the range of drugs that suitably qualified optometrists could prescribe. Therefore, the distribution of optometrists authorised to prescribe drugs and those not authorised to prescribe drugs was also investigated.MethodsInformation from the New Zealand Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians Board register and information from the Medical Council's website were used to create a database of ophthalmic practitioners and their locations. The χ2 goodness‐of‐fit test was carried out to determine whether the distribution of the number of practitioners across the regions was in proportion to the population of the regions.ResultsOphthalmologists were distributed across the regions in proportion to the regional population size. However, optometrists were concentrated in Auckland and other regions with high populations. Optometrists authorised to prescribe drugs comprised over 74 per cent of optometrists and were the majority of optometrists in most regions. Many of the regions with populations less than 200,000 had high population‐to‐practitioner ratios, indicating that they may not have sufficient numbers of ophthalmic practitioners in order to provide for the ocular needs of the community.ConclusionBetter distribution of the optometric workforce could make eye care more accessible in many regions of New Zealand.

AB - BackgroundThe New Zealand Ministry of Health provides funding for the delivery of health care across regions via 20 District Health Boards. Funding includes the subsidisation of therapeutic pharmaceutical agents/drugs. The distribution of optometrists and ophthalmologists across the regions was investigated to understand the accessibility of eye care in New Zealand. Changes made to the optometrists' scope of practice in 2005 and in 2014 increased the range of drugs that suitably qualified optometrists could prescribe. Therefore, the distribution of optometrists authorised to prescribe drugs and those not authorised to prescribe drugs was also investigated.MethodsInformation from the New Zealand Optometrists and Dispensing Opticians Board register and information from the Medical Council's website were used to create a database of ophthalmic practitioners and their locations. The χ2 goodness‐of‐fit test was carried out to determine whether the distribution of the number of practitioners across the regions was in proportion to the population of the regions.ResultsOphthalmologists were distributed across the regions in proportion to the regional population size. However, optometrists were concentrated in Auckland and other regions with high populations. Optometrists authorised to prescribe drugs comprised over 74 per cent of optometrists and were the majority of optometrists in most regions. Many of the regions with populations less than 200,000 had high population‐to‐practitioner ratios, indicating that they may not have sufficient numbers of ophthalmic practitioners in order to provide for the ocular needs of the community.ConclusionBetter distribution of the optometric workforce could make eye care more accessible in many regions of New Zealand.

KW - geographic distribution

KW - ophthalmologists

KW - optometrists

KW - therapeutic pharmaceutical agents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075749741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cxo.12998

DO - 10.1111/cxo.12998

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 11

JO - The Australasian journal of optometry

JF - The Australasian journal of optometry

SN - 0816-4622

ER -