Geometric toys in the attic? A corpus analysis of early exposure to geometric shapes

Ilyse Resnick, Brian N. Verdine, Roberta Golinkoff, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Preschoolers' experiences with shapes are important because geometry is foundational to aspects of mathematics and it is now part of the Common Core for school-readiness. Exposure to shapes also provides experiences that are key to developing spatial thinking more broadly. Yet achieving a strong conceptual understanding of geometric categories can extend well into elementary school (Satlow and Newcombe, 1998) despite a general sense that many kindergarten children "know their shapes." The extended time period may be partially a product of the nature of the spatial input to which children are exposed. This study characterizes the geometric input preschoolers receive from three sources: shape books, sorters, and interactive digital content. These shape materials were examined for the types of shapes they include. Shapes were further classified as canonical (e.g., equilateral triangles) vs. non-canonical (e.g., isosceles or scalene), and whether the shape was presented as a geometric form vs. everyday object and in isolation vs. embedded in a scene. The quantity of shape terms was documented for each shape material. The level of sophistication of associated shape language was assessed by tracking the presence of geometric adjectives and explicit definitions. Findings suggest that children are exposed to a limited number of shape categories and very few non-typical variants within those categories. Shapes were typically labeled with only a single generic identifier (e.g., triangle) and few of the materials provided explicit definitions, geometric adjectives (e.g., scalene), or identified similarities and differences across shapes. Findings suggest a need for more thoughtful design of shape learning materials to provide variety and evoke discussion of their defining properties.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)358-365
Number of pages8
JournalEarly Childhood Research Quarterly
Volume36
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Play and Playthings
toy
mathematics
school readiness
kindergarten child
Mathematics
elementary school
social isolation
experience
Language
Learning
language
learning

Cite this

Resnick, Ilyse ; Verdine, Brian N. ; Golinkoff, Roberta ; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy. / Geometric toys in the attic? A corpus analysis of early exposure to geometric shapes. In: Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2016 ; Vol. 36. pp. 358-365.
@article{d94baa4480d3492d9ca98bbfd4f0af31,
title = "Geometric toys in the attic? A corpus analysis of early exposure to geometric shapes",
abstract = "Preschoolers' experiences with shapes are important because geometry is foundational to aspects of mathematics and it is now part of the Common Core for school-readiness. Exposure to shapes also provides experiences that are key to developing spatial thinking more broadly. Yet achieving a strong conceptual understanding of geometric categories can extend well into elementary school (Satlow and Newcombe, 1998) despite a general sense that many kindergarten children {"}know their shapes.{"} The extended time period may be partially a product of the nature of the spatial input to which children are exposed. This study characterizes the geometric input preschoolers receive from three sources: shape books, sorters, and interactive digital content. These shape materials were examined for the types of shapes they include. Shapes were further classified as canonical (e.g., equilateral triangles) vs. non-canonical (e.g., isosceles or scalene), and whether the shape was presented as a geometric form vs. everyday object and in isolation vs. embedded in a scene. The quantity of shape terms was documented for each shape material. The level of sophistication of associated shape language was assessed by tracking the presence of geometric adjectives and explicit definitions. Findings suggest that children are exposed to a limited number of shape categories and very few non-typical variants within those categories. Shapes were typically labeled with only a single generic identifier (e.g., triangle) and few of the materials provided explicit definitions, geometric adjectives (e.g., scalene), or identified similarities and differences across shapes. Findings suggest a need for more thoughtful design of shape learning materials to provide variety and evoke discussion of their defining properties.",
keywords = "Category learning, Input, Shapes, Spatial thinking, STEM",
author = "Ilyse Resnick and Verdine, {Brian N.} and Roberta Golinkoff and Kathy Hirsh-Pasek",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.007",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "358--365",
journal = "Early Childhood Research Quarterly",
issn = "0885-2006",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Geometric toys in the attic? A corpus analysis of early exposure to geometric shapes. / Resnick, Ilyse; Verdine, Brian N.; Golinkoff, Roberta; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy.

In: Early Childhood Research Quarterly, Vol. 36, 03.03.2016, p. 358-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geometric toys in the attic? A corpus analysis of early exposure to geometric shapes

AU - Resnick, Ilyse

AU - Verdine, Brian N.

AU - Golinkoff, Roberta

AU - Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy

PY - 2016/3/3

Y1 - 2016/3/3

N2 - Preschoolers' experiences with shapes are important because geometry is foundational to aspects of mathematics and it is now part of the Common Core for school-readiness. Exposure to shapes also provides experiences that are key to developing spatial thinking more broadly. Yet achieving a strong conceptual understanding of geometric categories can extend well into elementary school (Satlow and Newcombe, 1998) despite a general sense that many kindergarten children "know their shapes." The extended time period may be partially a product of the nature of the spatial input to which children are exposed. This study characterizes the geometric input preschoolers receive from three sources: shape books, sorters, and interactive digital content. These shape materials were examined for the types of shapes they include. Shapes were further classified as canonical (e.g., equilateral triangles) vs. non-canonical (e.g., isosceles or scalene), and whether the shape was presented as a geometric form vs. everyday object and in isolation vs. embedded in a scene. The quantity of shape terms was documented for each shape material. The level of sophistication of associated shape language was assessed by tracking the presence of geometric adjectives and explicit definitions. Findings suggest that children are exposed to a limited number of shape categories and very few non-typical variants within those categories. Shapes were typically labeled with only a single generic identifier (e.g., triangle) and few of the materials provided explicit definitions, geometric adjectives (e.g., scalene), or identified similarities and differences across shapes. Findings suggest a need for more thoughtful design of shape learning materials to provide variety and evoke discussion of their defining properties.

AB - Preschoolers' experiences with shapes are important because geometry is foundational to aspects of mathematics and it is now part of the Common Core for school-readiness. Exposure to shapes also provides experiences that are key to developing spatial thinking more broadly. Yet achieving a strong conceptual understanding of geometric categories can extend well into elementary school (Satlow and Newcombe, 1998) despite a general sense that many kindergarten children "know their shapes." The extended time period may be partially a product of the nature of the spatial input to which children are exposed. This study characterizes the geometric input preschoolers receive from three sources: shape books, sorters, and interactive digital content. These shape materials were examined for the types of shapes they include. Shapes were further classified as canonical (e.g., equilateral triangles) vs. non-canonical (e.g., isosceles or scalene), and whether the shape was presented as a geometric form vs. everyday object and in isolation vs. embedded in a scene. The quantity of shape terms was documented for each shape material. The level of sophistication of associated shape language was assessed by tracking the presence of geometric adjectives and explicit definitions. Findings suggest that children are exposed to a limited number of shape categories and very few non-typical variants within those categories. Shapes were typically labeled with only a single generic identifier (e.g., triangle) and few of the materials provided explicit definitions, geometric adjectives (e.g., scalene), or identified similarities and differences across shapes. Findings suggest a need for more thoughtful design of shape learning materials to provide variety and evoke discussion of their defining properties.

KW - Category learning

KW - Input

KW - Shapes

KW - Spatial thinking

KW - STEM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957045348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.007

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 358

EP - 365

JO - Early Childhood Research Quarterly

JF - Early Childhood Research Quarterly

SN - 0885-2006

ER -