Global Civil Society: The Progress of Post-Westphalian Politics

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    30 Citations (Scopus)
    4 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Despite lingering ambiguity surrounding the concept, global civil society is acclaimed by those who think they belong to it, and validated by international governmental organizations seeking legitimation for their activities. Its enthusiasts believe global civil society presages a more congenial kind of politics that transcends the system of sovereign states. Its critics deride its un-representativeness and complicity in established power relations. The critics can be answered by more subtle accounts of representation and by highlighting contestatory practices. Appreciation of the promise and perils of global civil society requires moving beyond preconceptions rooted in dated ideas about civil society and democracy as they allegedly function within states. Irrespective of the sophistication of such post-Westphalian moves, global civil society remains contested terrain, involving interconnected political and intellectual disputes. International relations theory proves less useful than it should be in clarifying what is at stake. Democratic theory can be brought to bear, and this encounter sheds new light on what democracy itself can entail
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)101-119
    Number of pages19
    JournalAnnual Review of Political Science
    Volume15
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    civil society
    politics
    critic
    democracy
    legitimation
    international relations

    Cite this

    @article{d6267711808d4bddb4b01c74b37a8501,
    title = "Global Civil Society: The Progress of Post-Westphalian Politics",
    abstract = "Despite lingering ambiguity surrounding the concept, global civil society is acclaimed by those who think they belong to it, and validated by international governmental organizations seeking legitimation for their activities. Its enthusiasts believe global civil society presages a more congenial kind of politics that transcends the system of sovereign states. Its critics deride its un-representativeness and complicity in established power relations. The critics can be answered by more subtle accounts of representation and by highlighting contestatory practices. Appreciation of the promise and perils of global civil society requires moving beyond preconceptions rooted in dated ideas about civil society and democracy as they allegedly function within states. Irrespective of the sophistication of such post-Westphalian moves, global civil society remains contested terrain, involving interconnected political and intellectual disputes. International relations theory proves less useful than it should be in clarifying what is at stake. Democratic theory can be brought to bear, and this encounter sheds new light on what democracy itself can entail",
    author = "John Dryzek",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1146/annurev-polisci-042010-164946",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "101--119",
    journal = "Annual Review of Political Science",
    issn = "1094-2939",
    publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",

    }

    Global Civil Society: The Progress of Post-Westphalian Politics. / Dryzek, John.

    In: Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 15, 2012, p. 101-119.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Global Civil Society: The Progress of Post-Westphalian Politics

    AU - Dryzek, John

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Despite lingering ambiguity surrounding the concept, global civil society is acclaimed by those who think they belong to it, and validated by international governmental organizations seeking legitimation for their activities. Its enthusiasts believe global civil society presages a more congenial kind of politics that transcends the system of sovereign states. Its critics deride its un-representativeness and complicity in established power relations. The critics can be answered by more subtle accounts of representation and by highlighting contestatory practices. Appreciation of the promise and perils of global civil society requires moving beyond preconceptions rooted in dated ideas about civil society and democracy as they allegedly function within states. Irrespective of the sophistication of such post-Westphalian moves, global civil society remains contested terrain, involving interconnected political and intellectual disputes. International relations theory proves less useful than it should be in clarifying what is at stake. Democratic theory can be brought to bear, and this encounter sheds new light on what democracy itself can entail

    AB - Despite lingering ambiguity surrounding the concept, global civil society is acclaimed by those who think they belong to it, and validated by international governmental organizations seeking legitimation for their activities. Its enthusiasts believe global civil society presages a more congenial kind of politics that transcends the system of sovereign states. Its critics deride its un-representativeness and complicity in established power relations. The critics can be answered by more subtle accounts of representation and by highlighting contestatory practices. Appreciation of the promise and perils of global civil society requires moving beyond preconceptions rooted in dated ideas about civil society and democracy as they allegedly function within states. Irrespective of the sophistication of such post-Westphalian moves, global civil society remains contested terrain, involving interconnected political and intellectual disputes. International relations theory proves less useful than it should be in clarifying what is at stake. Democratic theory can be brought to bear, and this encounter sheds new light on what democracy itself can entail

    U2 - 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042010-164946

    DO - 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042010-164946

    M3 - Article

    VL - 15

    SP - 101

    EP - 119

    JO - Annual Review of Political Science

    JF - Annual Review of Political Science

    SN - 1094-2939

    ER -