Global climate governance between hard and soft law

Can the Paris agreement's 'Crème Brûleé' approach enhance ecological reflexivity?

Jonathan Pickering, Jeffrey S. McGee, Sylvia I. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Joseph Wenta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the face of global environmental concerns, legal institutions must cultivate a reflexive capacity to monitor global ecological shifts and to reconfigure their practices accordingly. But, it remains unclear whether harder or softer legal norms are more capable of enhancing such ecological reflexivity. This article traces variations in harder and softer norms in two aspects of the evolution of the global climate change regime-national contributions to mitigation and review mechanisms- A nd their implications for ecological reflexivity. We find the regime's reflexivity has increased moderately and slowly over time but without a consistent shift towards harder or softer norms. The Paris Agreement's innovative approach, combining harder procedural commitments with softer substantive provisions (a 'crème brûleé'), has potential to encourage flexible responses to changing conditions within a stable, long-term architecture. However, the Agreement's softer, transparency-based compliance framework provides limited assurance that countries will make and fulfill ambitious commitments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-28
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Environmental Law
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

ecological approach
reflexivity
global climate
climate
governance
Law
regime
commitment
legal norm
transparency
compliance
mitigation
climate change
norm

Cite this

@article{f5c39f7db44a4942a1dad42dd4802aa9,
title = "Global climate governance between hard and soft law: Can the Paris agreement's 'Cr{\`e}me Br{\^u}le{\'e}' approach enhance ecological reflexivity?",
abstract = "In the face of global environmental concerns, legal institutions must cultivate a reflexive capacity to monitor global ecological shifts and to reconfigure their practices accordingly. But, it remains unclear whether harder or softer legal norms are more capable of enhancing such ecological reflexivity. This article traces variations in harder and softer norms in two aspects of the evolution of the global climate change regime-national contributions to mitigation and review mechanisms- A nd their implications for ecological reflexivity. We find the regime's reflexivity has increased moderately and slowly over time but without a consistent shift towards harder or softer norms. The Paris Agreement's innovative approach, combining harder procedural commitments with softer substantive provisions (a 'cr{\`e}me br{\^u}le{\'e}'), has potential to encourage flexible responses to changing conditions within a stable, long-term architecture. However, the Agreement's softer, transparency-based compliance framework provides limited assurance that countries will make and fulfill ambitious commitments.",
keywords = "Climate change, ecological reflexivity, legalisation, Paris Agreement, soft law, UNFCCC",
author = "Jonathan Pickering and McGee, {Jeffrey S.} and Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, {Sylvia I.} and Joseph Wenta",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jel/eqy018",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "1--28",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Law",
issn = "0952-8873",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

Global climate governance between hard and soft law : Can the Paris agreement's 'Crème Brûleé' approach enhance ecological reflexivity? / Pickering, Jonathan; McGee, Jeffrey S.; Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I.; Wenta, Joseph.

In: Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.03.2019, p. 1-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global climate governance between hard and soft law

T2 - Can the Paris agreement's 'Crème Brûleé' approach enhance ecological reflexivity?

AU - Pickering, Jonathan

AU - McGee, Jeffrey S.

AU - Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I.

AU - Wenta, Joseph

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - In the face of global environmental concerns, legal institutions must cultivate a reflexive capacity to monitor global ecological shifts and to reconfigure their practices accordingly. But, it remains unclear whether harder or softer legal norms are more capable of enhancing such ecological reflexivity. This article traces variations in harder and softer norms in two aspects of the evolution of the global climate change regime-national contributions to mitigation and review mechanisms- A nd their implications for ecological reflexivity. We find the regime's reflexivity has increased moderately and slowly over time but without a consistent shift towards harder or softer norms. The Paris Agreement's innovative approach, combining harder procedural commitments with softer substantive provisions (a 'crème brûleé'), has potential to encourage flexible responses to changing conditions within a stable, long-term architecture. However, the Agreement's softer, transparency-based compliance framework provides limited assurance that countries will make and fulfill ambitious commitments.

AB - In the face of global environmental concerns, legal institutions must cultivate a reflexive capacity to monitor global ecological shifts and to reconfigure their practices accordingly. But, it remains unclear whether harder or softer legal norms are more capable of enhancing such ecological reflexivity. This article traces variations in harder and softer norms in two aspects of the evolution of the global climate change regime-national contributions to mitigation and review mechanisms- A nd their implications for ecological reflexivity. We find the regime's reflexivity has increased moderately and slowly over time but without a consistent shift towards harder or softer norms. The Paris Agreement's innovative approach, combining harder procedural commitments with softer substantive provisions (a 'crème brûleé'), has potential to encourage flexible responses to changing conditions within a stable, long-term architecture. However, the Agreement's softer, transparency-based compliance framework provides limited assurance that countries will make and fulfill ambitious commitments.

KW - Climate change

KW - ecological reflexivity

KW - legalisation

KW - Paris Agreement

KW - soft law

KW - UNFCCC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064153244&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jel/eqy018

DO - 10.1093/jel/eqy018

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 1

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Environmental Law

JF - Journal of Environmental Law

SN - 0952-8873

IS - 1

ER -