Globalisation and public policy under new labour

Philip G. Cerny, Mark Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The concept of the Competition State differs from the Post-Fordist State proposed by regulation theory, which asserts that the contemporary restructuring of the state is aimed at maintaining its general function of stabilising the national polity and promoting the domestic economy in the public interest. In contrast, the Competition State focuses on the transformation of the state from within with regard to the reform of political institutions, functions and processes, in the face of processes of globalisation. It is argued that the state does not merely adapt to exogenous structural constraints; domestic political actors take a proactive lead in the process through both policy entrepreneurship and the rearticulation of domestic political and social coalitions, on both the right and the left, as alternatives are incrementally eroded. State intervention itself is aimed at not only adjusting to, but also sustaining, promoting, and expanding an open global economy in order to capture its perceived benefits. Such strategies, while reinforcing the roles and positions of such actors, can also undermine the generic function of the state seen in terms of traditional conceptions of social justice and the public interest and create the space for social conflict. It is further argued that the New Labour government in the UK has adopted a policy agenda which in its most crucial aspects reflects the continuing transformation of the British State into a Competition State in an attempt to adapt state action to cope more effectively with what they define as global 'realities'.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-65
Number of pages15
JournalPolicy Studies
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

New Labour
public policy
globalization
public interest
regulation theory
economy
social conflict
political actor
political institution
entrepreneurship
social justice
coalition
restructuring
reform

Cite this

Cerny, Philip G. ; Evans, Mark. / Globalisation and public policy under new labour. In: Policy Studies. 2004 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 51-65.
@article{b58a20e7636a45609558160080f49408,
title = "Globalisation and public policy under new labour",
abstract = "The concept of the Competition State differs from the Post-Fordist State proposed by regulation theory, which asserts that the contemporary restructuring of the state is aimed at maintaining its general function of stabilising the national polity and promoting the domestic economy in the public interest. In contrast, the Competition State focuses on the transformation of the state from within with regard to the reform of political institutions, functions and processes, in the face of processes of globalisation. It is argued that the state does not merely adapt to exogenous structural constraints; domestic political actors take a proactive lead in the process through both policy entrepreneurship and the rearticulation of domestic political and social coalitions, on both the right and the left, as alternatives are incrementally eroded. State intervention itself is aimed at not only adjusting to, but also sustaining, promoting, and expanding an open global economy in order to capture its perceived benefits. Such strategies, while reinforcing the roles and positions of such actors, can also undermine the generic function of the state seen in terms of traditional conceptions of social justice and the public interest and create the space for social conflict. It is further argued that the New Labour government in the UK has adopted a policy agenda which in its most crucial aspects reflects the continuing transformation of the British State into a Competition State in an attempt to adapt state action to cope more effectively with what they define as global 'realities'.",
author = "Cerny, {Philip G.} and Mark Evans",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/01442870420002081242",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "51--65",
journal = "Policy Studies",
issn = "0144-2872",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Globalisation and public policy under new labour. / Cerny, Philip G.; Evans, Mark.

In: Policy Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1, 03.2004, p. 51-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Globalisation and public policy under new labour

AU - Cerny, Philip G.

AU - Evans, Mark

PY - 2004/3

Y1 - 2004/3

N2 - The concept of the Competition State differs from the Post-Fordist State proposed by regulation theory, which asserts that the contemporary restructuring of the state is aimed at maintaining its general function of stabilising the national polity and promoting the domestic economy in the public interest. In contrast, the Competition State focuses on the transformation of the state from within with regard to the reform of political institutions, functions and processes, in the face of processes of globalisation. It is argued that the state does not merely adapt to exogenous structural constraints; domestic political actors take a proactive lead in the process through both policy entrepreneurship and the rearticulation of domestic political and social coalitions, on both the right and the left, as alternatives are incrementally eroded. State intervention itself is aimed at not only adjusting to, but also sustaining, promoting, and expanding an open global economy in order to capture its perceived benefits. Such strategies, while reinforcing the roles and positions of such actors, can also undermine the generic function of the state seen in terms of traditional conceptions of social justice and the public interest and create the space for social conflict. It is further argued that the New Labour government in the UK has adopted a policy agenda which in its most crucial aspects reflects the continuing transformation of the British State into a Competition State in an attempt to adapt state action to cope more effectively with what they define as global 'realities'.

AB - The concept of the Competition State differs from the Post-Fordist State proposed by regulation theory, which asserts that the contemporary restructuring of the state is aimed at maintaining its general function of stabilising the national polity and promoting the domestic economy in the public interest. In contrast, the Competition State focuses on the transformation of the state from within with regard to the reform of political institutions, functions and processes, in the face of processes of globalisation. It is argued that the state does not merely adapt to exogenous structural constraints; domestic political actors take a proactive lead in the process through both policy entrepreneurship and the rearticulation of domestic political and social coalitions, on both the right and the left, as alternatives are incrementally eroded. State intervention itself is aimed at not only adjusting to, but also sustaining, promoting, and expanding an open global economy in order to capture its perceived benefits. Such strategies, while reinforcing the roles and positions of such actors, can also undermine the generic function of the state seen in terms of traditional conceptions of social justice and the public interest and create the space for social conflict. It is further argued that the New Labour government in the UK has adopted a policy agenda which in its most crucial aspects reflects the continuing transformation of the British State into a Competition State in an attempt to adapt state action to cope more effectively with what they define as global 'realities'.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2142769701&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01442870420002081242

DO - 10.1080/01442870420002081242

M3 - Review article

VL - 25

SP - 51

EP - 65

JO - Policy Studies

JF - Policy Studies

SN - 0144-2872

IS - 1

ER -