Golden age, apathy or stealth?

Democratic engagement in Britain, 1945–1950

Jonathan Moss, Nick Clarke, Will Jennings, Gerry STOKER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article revisits democratic engagement in post-war Britain in a context of debates about political disaffection in the current period. The study systematically reanalysed volunteer writing in the Mass Observation Archive and represents a significant methodological advance on previous studies. Little evidence was found to support common existing interpretations: whether ‘golden age’ narratives of deference to authority, partisan alignment and high voter turnout or revisionist accounts of apathy. Instead, evidence was found of something akin to what Hibbing and Theiss-Morse call ‘stealth democracy’. Citizens thought democracy to be important and felt a duty to vote, but wished for government by experts in the national interest. This ‘stealth’ interpretation builds on existing studies of duty, populism and expertise in twentieth-century Britain. It helps to move discussion of democratic engagement after the Second World War beyond the binaries of self/collective and private/public, and to explain the paradox of high voter turnout in a context of hostility to party politics. It also promises to inform debates about declining political support in the current period.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-462
Number of pages22
JournalContemporary British History
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

apathy
voter turnout
democracy
populism
party politics
interpretation
political support
World War
twentieth century
evidence
voter
expertise
expert
citizen
narrative
Democracy
Turnout
Golden Age
alignment
public

Cite this

Moss, Jonathan ; Clarke, Nick ; Jennings, Will ; STOKER, Gerry. / Golden age, apathy or stealth? Democratic engagement in Britain, 1945–1950. In: Contemporary British History. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 441-462.
@article{6aa5c3fd7b3b4895ac201b4ad902a020,
title = "Golden age, apathy or stealth?: Democratic engagement in Britain, 1945–1950",
abstract = "This article revisits democratic engagement in post-war Britain in a context of debates about political disaffection in the current period. The study systematically reanalysed volunteer writing in the Mass Observation Archive and represents a significant methodological advance on previous studies. Little evidence was found to support common existing interpretations: whether ‘golden age’ narratives of deference to authority, partisan alignment and high voter turnout or revisionist accounts of apathy. Instead, evidence was found of something akin to what Hibbing and Theiss-Morse call ‘stealth democracy’. Citizens thought democracy to be important and felt a duty to vote, but wished for government by experts in the national interest. This ‘stealth’ interpretation builds on existing studies of duty, populism and expertise in twentieth-century Britain. It helps to move discussion of democratic engagement after the Second World War beyond the binaries of self/collective and private/public, and to explain the paradox of high voter turnout in a context of hostility to party politics. It also promises to inform debates about declining political support in the current period.",
keywords = "Britain, democracy, Mass Observation, politics, post-war",
author = "Jonathan Moss and Nick Clarke and Will Jennings and Gerry STOKER",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/13619462.2016.1180982",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "441--462",
journal = "Contemporary British History",
issn = "1361-9462",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Golden age, apathy or stealth? Democratic engagement in Britain, 1945–1950. / Moss, Jonathan; Clarke, Nick; Jennings, Will; STOKER, Gerry.

In: Contemporary British History, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2016, p. 441-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Golden age, apathy or stealth?

T2 - Democratic engagement in Britain, 1945–1950

AU - Moss, Jonathan

AU - Clarke, Nick

AU - Jennings, Will

AU - STOKER, Gerry

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article revisits democratic engagement in post-war Britain in a context of debates about political disaffection in the current period. The study systematically reanalysed volunteer writing in the Mass Observation Archive and represents a significant methodological advance on previous studies. Little evidence was found to support common existing interpretations: whether ‘golden age’ narratives of deference to authority, partisan alignment and high voter turnout or revisionist accounts of apathy. Instead, evidence was found of something akin to what Hibbing and Theiss-Morse call ‘stealth democracy’. Citizens thought democracy to be important and felt a duty to vote, but wished for government by experts in the national interest. This ‘stealth’ interpretation builds on existing studies of duty, populism and expertise in twentieth-century Britain. It helps to move discussion of democratic engagement after the Second World War beyond the binaries of self/collective and private/public, and to explain the paradox of high voter turnout in a context of hostility to party politics. It also promises to inform debates about declining political support in the current period.

AB - This article revisits democratic engagement in post-war Britain in a context of debates about political disaffection in the current period. The study systematically reanalysed volunteer writing in the Mass Observation Archive and represents a significant methodological advance on previous studies. Little evidence was found to support common existing interpretations: whether ‘golden age’ narratives of deference to authority, partisan alignment and high voter turnout or revisionist accounts of apathy. Instead, evidence was found of something akin to what Hibbing and Theiss-Morse call ‘stealth democracy’. Citizens thought democracy to be important and felt a duty to vote, but wished for government by experts in the national interest. This ‘stealth’ interpretation builds on existing studies of duty, populism and expertise in twentieth-century Britain. It helps to move discussion of democratic engagement after the Second World War beyond the binaries of self/collective and private/public, and to explain the paradox of high voter turnout in a context of hostility to party politics. It also promises to inform debates about declining political support in the current period.

KW - Britain

KW - democracy

KW - Mass Observation

KW - politics

KW - post-war

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84974852033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/golden-age-apathy-stealth-democratic-engagement-britain-19451950

U2 - 10.1080/13619462.2016.1180982

DO - 10.1080/13619462.2016.1180982

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 441

EP - 462

JO - Contemporary British History

JF - Contemporary British History

SN - 1361-9462

IS - 4

ER -