Governance and Nuclear Power

Why Governing is Easier Said than Done

Keith Baker, Gerry Stoker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Governance studies have taken an interpretative turn. There is value in this development which emphasises how, through the construction of narrative and meaning, the processes of governance can be given direction. A study of Britain's privatised energy industry, embedded in a complex set of international networks and market conditions, is used to illustrate the argument. Government cannot command an expansion of nuclear power to meet future energy needs but is seeking to deliver it through a governance narrative that is collaborative and decentred. To judge the likely success of this governance stance requires stepping beyond an interpretative frame and complementing it with insights from a historical institutional perspective. The British government is severely hampered in achieving its objectives by institutional and structural constraints
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)580-598
Number of pages19
JournalPolitical Studies
Volume61
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

nuclear power
governance
energy industry
narrative
energy
market
Values

Cite this

@article{3d413cae6ea14340be060ac3a51f7a1d,
title = "Governance and Nuclear Power: Why Governing is Easier Said than Done",
abstract = "Governance studies have taken an interpretative turn. There is value in this development which emphasises how, through the construction of narrative and meaning, the processes of governance can be given direction. A study of Britain's privatised energy industry, embedded in a complex set of international networks and market conditions, is used to illustrate the argument. Government cannot command an expansion of nuclear power to meet future energy needs but is seeking to deliver it through a governance narrative that is collaborative and decentred. To judge the likely success of this governance stance requires stepping beyond an interpretative frame and complementing it with insights from a historical institutional perspective. The British government is severely hampered in achieving its objectives by institutional and structural constraints",
author = "Keith Baker and Gerry Stoker",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00978.x",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "580--598",
journal = "Political Studies",
issn = "0032-3217",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Governance and Nuclear Power : Why Governing is Easier Said than Done. / Baker, Keith; Stoker, Gerry.

In: Political Studies, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2013, p. 580-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance and Nuclear Power

T2 - Why Governing is Easier Said than Done

AU - Baker, Keith

AU - Stoker, Gerry

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Governance studies have taken an interpretative turn. There is value in this development which emphasises how, through the construction of narrative and meaning, the processes of governance can be given direction. A study of Britain's privatised energy industry, embedded in a complex set of international networks and market conditions, is used to illustrate the argument. Government cannot command an expansion of nuclear power to meet future energy needs but is seeking to deliver it through a governance narrative that is collaborative and decentred. To judge the likely success of this governance stance requires stepping beyond an interpretative frame and complementing it with insights from a historical institutional perspective. The British government is severely hampered in achieving its objectives by institutional and structural constraints

AB - Governance studies have taken an interpretative turn. There is value in this development which emphasises how, through the construction of narrative and meaning, the processes of governance can be given direction. A study of Britain's privatised energy industry, embedded in a complex set of international networks and market conditions, is used to illustrate the argument. Government cannot command an expansion of nuclear power to meet future energy needs but is seeking to deliver it through a governance narrative that is collaborative and decentred. To judge the likely success of this governance stance requires stepping beyond an interpretative frame and complementing it with insights from a historical institutional perspective. The British government is severely hampered in achieving its objectives by institutional and structural constraints

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00978.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00978.x

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 580

EP - 598

JO - Political Studies

JF - Political Studies

SN - 0032-3217

IS - 3

ER -