Guided by Priority: How Clinicians Manage Access to Opioid Replacement Therapy

WARREN HARLOW, Brenda HAPPELL, Graeme Browne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Access to opioid replacement therapy is a problem in some parts of Australia and it is not known how clinicians respond to this situation. The aim of this study is to develop a conceptual understanding of how clinicians apply clinical judgements in managing access to treatment. Grounded theory methodology was used to guide this study. Thirty-five clinicians were interviewed. The substantive theory presented to explain the process is Guided by Priority. By presenting this understanding of practice, clinicians can reflect on their actions related to the task and determine if they are beneficial or detrimental to consumers, which may influence their future practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)455-463
Number of pages9
JournalIssues in Mental Health Nursing
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Opiate Substitution Treatment
Therapeutics
Grounded Theory
Study Guide

Cite this

HARLOW, WARREN ; HAPPELL, Brenda ; Browne, Graeme. / Guided by Priority: How Clinicians Manage Access to Opioid Replacement Therapy. In: Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 6. pp. 455-463.
@article{df412a85b8ec43c08a25c2de8e50fa87,
title = "Guided by Priority: How Clinicians Manage Access to Opioid Replacement Therapy",
abstract = "Access to opioid replacement therapy is a problem in some parts of Australia and it is not known how clinicians respond to this situation. The aim of this study is to develop a conceptual understanding of how clinicians apply clinical judgements in managing access to treatment. Grounded theory methodology was used to guide this study. Thirty-five clinicians were interviewed. The substantive theory presented to explain the process is Guided by Priority. By presenting this understanding of practice, clinicians can reflect on their actions related to the task and determine if they are beneficial or detrimental to consumers, which may influence their future practice.",
author = "WARREN HARLOW and Brenda HAPPELL and Graeme Browne",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3109/01612840.2013.873102",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "455--463",
journal = "Issues in Mental Health Nursing",
issn = "0161-2840",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "6",

}

Guided by Priority: How Clinicians Manage Access to Opioid Replacement Therapy. / HARLOW, WARREN; HAPPELL, Brenda; Browne, Graeme.

In: Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 35, No. 6, 2014, p. 455-463.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guided by Priority: How Clinicians Manage Access to Opioid Replacement Therapy

AU - HARLOW, WARREN

AU - HAPPELL, Brenda

AU - Browne, Graeme

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Access to opioid replacement therapy is a problem in some parts of Australia and it is not known how clinicians respond to this situation. The aim of this study is to develop a conceptual understanding of how clinicians apply clinical judgements in managing access to treatment. Grounded theory methodology was used to guide this study. Thirty-five clinicians were interviewed. The substantive theory presented to explain the process is Guided by Priority. By presenting this understanding of practice, clinicians can reflect on their actions related to the task and determine if they are beneficial or detrimental to consumers, which may influence their future practice.

AB - Access to opioid replacement therapy is a problem in some parts of Australia and it is not known how clinicians respond to this situation. The aim of this study is to develop a conceptual understanding of how clinicians apply clinical judgements in managing access to treatment. Grounded theory methodology was used to guide this study. Thirty-five clinicians were interviewed. The substantive theory presented to explain the process is Guided by Priority. By presenting this understanding of practice, clinicians can reflect on their actions related to the task and determine if they are beneficial or detrimental to consumers, which may influence their future practice.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901321858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/01612840.2013.873102

DO - 10.3109/01612840.2013.873102

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 455

EP - 463

JO - Issues in Mental Health Nursing

JF - Issues in Mental Health Nursing

SN - 0161-2840

IS - 6

ER -