Guilty until proven innocent? - The assumption of care of a baby at birth

Jenny BROWNE, Janice Taylor, Deborah DAVIS

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This paper provides an overview of the history of child protection, the associated law and the 2008 amendments to the Child and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 in relation to the Assumption of Care at birth Practice. Objective: To explore the current practice of an Assumption of Care (AOC) where a newborn baby is removed from his/her mother at the time of birth, particularly focussing on the impact of the AOC on midwives. Discussion: Assumption of Care practices in NSW raise significant issues for midwives in relation to the midwifery codes of ethics and conduct and importantly, to their ability to work in ways that honour a "woman-centred care" philosophy. When midwives are exposed to conflict between workplace and personal or professional values such as the practice of AOC cognitive dissonance can occur. Conclusions: Further research is required to understand the impact of current Assumption of Care. Broader research to not only look at effect on the midwife but also on other health professionals involved and the women who personally experience the removal of their baby at the time of birth. Consideration must also be given to ways of working with vulnerable families to enhance the acceptability and efficacy of maternity services and with associated agencies will decrease the need for Assumption of Care at birth.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-70
Number of pages6
JournalWomen and Birth
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Midwifery
Parturition
Cognitive Dissonance
Codes of Ethics
Aptitude
Research
Workplace
History
Mothers
Newborn Infant
Health

Cite this

BROWNE, Jenny ; Taylor, Janice ; DAVIS, Deborah. / Guilty until proven innocent? - The assumption of care of a baby at birth. In: Women and Birth. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 65-70.
@article{2585b64c0162407cb75a6f3cc1da9ff9,
title = "Guilty until proven innocent? - The assumption of care of a baby at birth",
abstract = "Background: This paper provides an overview of the history of child protection, the associated law and the 2008 amendments to the Child and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 in relation to the Assumption of Care at birth Practice. Objective: To explore the current practice of an Assumption of Care (AOC) where a newborn baby is removed from his/her mother at the time of birth, particularly focussing on the impact of the AOC on midwives. Discussion: Assumption of Care practices in NSW raise significant issues for midwives in relation to the midwifery codes of ethics and conduct and importantly, to their ability to work in ways that honour a {"}woman-centred care{"} philosophy. When midwives are exposed to conflict between workplace and personal or professional values such as the practice of AOC cognitive dissonance can occur. Conclusions: Further research is required to understand the impact of current Assumption of Care. Broader research to not only look at effect on the midwife but also on other health professionals involved and the women who personally experience the removal of their baby at the time of birth. Consideration must also be given to ways of working with vulnerable families to enhance the acceptability and efficacy of maternity services and with associated agencies will decrease the need for Assumption of Care at birth.",
keywords = "Assumption of Care, Child protection, Midwifery, Ethics, Cognitive dissonance",
author = "Jenny BROWNE and Janice Taylor and Deborah DAVIS",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.wombi.2014.10.008",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "65--70",
journal = "Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated",
issn = "1871-5192",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Guilty until proven innocent? - The assumption of care of a baby at birth. / BROWNE, Jenny; Taylor, Janice; DAVIS, Deborah.

In: Women and Birth, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2015, p. 65-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guilty until proven innocent? - The assumption of care of a baby at birth

AU - BROWNE, Jenny

AU - Taylor, Janice

AU - DAVIS, Deborah

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background: This paper provides an overview of the history of child protection, the associated law and the 2008 amendments to the Child and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 in relation to the Assumption of Care at birth Practice. Objective: To explore the current practice of an Assumption of Care (AOC) where a newborn baby is removed from his/her mother at the time of birth, particularly focussing on the impact of the AOC on midwives. Discussion: Assumption of Care practices in NSW raise significant issues for midwives in relation to the midwifery codes of ethics and conduct and importantly, to their ability to work in ways that honour a "woman-centred care" philosophy. When midwives are exposed to conflict between workplace and personal or professional values such as the practice of AOC cognitive dissonance can occur. Conclusions: Further research is required to understand the impact of current Assumption of Care. Broader research to not only look at effect on the midwife but also on other health professionals involved and the women who personally experience the removal of their baby at the time of birth. Consideration must also be given to ways of working with vulnerable families to enhance the acceptability and efficacy of maternity services and with associated agencies will decrease the need for Assumption of Care at birth.

AB - Background: This paper provides an overview of the history of child protection, the associated law and the 2008 amendments to the Child and Young Persons (Care and Protection) Act 1998 in relation to the Assumption of Care at birth Practice. Objective: To explore the current practice of an Assumption of Care (AOC) where a newborn baby is removed from his/her mother at the time of birth, particularly focussing on the impact of the AOC on midwives. Discussion: Assumption of Care practices in NSW raise significant issues for midwives in relation to the midwifery codes of ethics and conduct and importantly, to their ability to work in ways that honour a "woman-centred care" philosophy. When midwives are exposed to conflict between workplace and personal or professional values such as the practice of AOC cognitive dissonance can occur. Conclusions: Further research is required to understand the impact of current Assumption of Care. Broader research to not only look at effect on the midwife but also on other health professionals involved and the women who personally experience the removal of their baby at the time of birth. Consideration must also be given to ways of working with vulnerable families to enhance the acceptability and efficacy of maternity services and with associated agencies will decrease the need for Assumption of Care at birth.

KW - Assumption of Care

KW - Child protection

KW - Midwifery

KW - Ethics

KW - Cognitive dissonance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923368994&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/guilty-until-proven-innocent-assumption-care-baby-birth-2

U2 - 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.10.008

DO - 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.10.008

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 65

EP - 70

JO - Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated

JF - Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated

SN - 1871-5192

IS - 1

ER -