TY - JOUR
T1 - Habitat size influences community stability
AU - Greig, Hamish S.
AU - McHugh, Peter A.
AU - Thompson, Ross M.
AU - Warburton, Helen J.
AU - McIntosh, Angus R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support was provided by the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund (UOC0801). R. Thompson was funded by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT110100957) and H. S. Greig was supported by the USDA NIFA Hatch project number #ME0‐21607 through the Maine Agricultural & Forest Experiment Station during manuscript preparation. Field and laboratory assistance were provided by Simon Howard, Milen Marinov, and Katie McHugh and Simon Coats calculated upstream network lengths. We thank the New Zealand Department of Conservation for permission to work on conservation land, and the managers of Brooksdale, Craigieburn, Flock Hill, and Mount White stations for stream access. We also thank our colleagues at the University of Canterbury and the University of Maine for discussions and comments that improved the manuscript, and last, we are grateful to our families who supported us in getting this work completed despite multiple earthquakes and other events that might have otherwise seen it remain unpublished.
Funding Information:
Financial support was provided by the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund (UOC0801). R. Thompson was funded by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT110100957) and H. S. Greig was supported by the USDA NIFA Hatch project number #ME0-21607 through the Maine Agricultural & Forest Experiment Station during manuscript preparation. Field and laboratory assistance were provided by Simon Howard, Milen Marinov, and Katie McHugh and Simon Coats calculated upstream network lengths. We thank the New Zealand Department of Conservation for permission to work on conservation land, and the managers of Brooksdale, Craigieburn, Flock Hill, and Mount White stations for stream access. We also thank our colleagues at the University of Canterbury and the University of Maine for discussions and comments that improved the manuscript, and last, we are grateful to our families who supported us in getting this work completed despite multiple earthquakes and other events that might have otherwise seen it remain unpublished.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the Ecological Society of America
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Mechanisms linked to demographic, biogeographic, and food-web processes thought to underpin community stability could be affected by habitat size, but the effects of habitat size on community stability remain relatively unknown. We investigated whether those habitat-size-dependent properties influenced community instability and vulnerability to perturbations caused by disturbance. This is particularly important given that human exploitation is contracting ecosystems, and abiotic perturbations are becoming more severe and frequent. We used a perturbation experiment in which 10 streams, spanning three orders of magnitude in habitat size, were subjected to simulated bed movement akin to a major flood disturbance event. We measured the resistance, resilience, and variability of basal resources, and population and community-level responses across the stream habitat-size gradient immediately before, and at 0.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 d post-disturbance. Resistance to disturbance consistently increased with stream size in all response variables. In contrast, resilience was significantly higher in smaller streams for some response variables. However, this higher resilience of small ecosystems was insufficient to compensate for their lower resistance, and communities of smaller streams were thus more variable over time than those of larger streams. Compensatory dynamics of populations, especially for predators, stabilized some aspects of communities, but these mechanisms were unrelated to habitat size. Together, our results provide compelling evidence for the links between habitat size and community stability, and should motivate ecologists and managers to consider how changes in the size of habitats will alter the vulnerability of ecosystems to perturbations caused by environmental disturbance.
AB - Mechanisms linked to demographic, biogeographic, and food-web processes thought to underpin community stability could be affected by habitat size, but the effects of habitat size on community stability remain relatively unknown. We investigated whether those habitat-size-dependent properties influenced community instability and vulnerability to perturbations caused by disturbance. This is particularly important given that human exploitation is contracting ecosystems, and abiotic perturbations are becoming more severe and frequent. We used a perturbation experiment in which 10 streams, spanning three orders of magnitude in habitat size, were subjected to simulated bed movement akin to a major flood disturbance event. We measured the resistance, resilience, and variability of basal resources, and population and community-level responses across the stream habitat-size gradient immediately before, and at 0.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 d post-disturbance. Resistance to disturbance consistently increased with stream size in all response variables. In contrast, resilience was significantly higher in smaller streams for some response variables. However, this higher resilience of small ecosystems was insufficient to compensate for their lower resistance, and communities of smaller streams were thus more variable over time than those of larger streams. Compensatory dynamics of populations, especially for predators, stabilized some aspects of communities, but these mechanisms were unrelated to habitat size. Together, our results provide compelling evidence for the links between habitat size and community stability, and should motivate ecologists and managers to consider how changes in the size of habitats will alter the vulnerability of ecosystems to perturbations caused by environmental disturbance.
KW - compensatory dynamics
KW - disturbance
KW - macroinvertebrates
KW - resilience
KW - resistance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118741320&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ecy.3545
DO - 10.1002/ecy.3545
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118741320
SN - 0012-9658
VL - 103
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Ecology
JF - Ecology
IS - 1
M1 - e03545
ER -