Have you checked for charcoal? Assessment of soil condition using soil organic carbon

Fiona DYER, Bill MAHER, Richard Norris

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Soil condition is commonly assessed by using soil organic carbon (SOC) as an indicator; however, a large proportion of the world’s soils can contain charcoal, a biologically-inert form of organic carbon. We investigated whether the presence of charcoal in soil could lead to an inaccurate assessment of soil condition when using SOC as an indicator. We sampled topsoil in a south-east Australian catchment affected by severe fires in 2003. Samples (n =100) were analysed for two SOC fractions: (i) total SOC (t-SOC, loss on ignition), which included charcoal, and (ii) biologically-active SOC (a-SOC, persulphate-oxidation), which did not contain charcoal. Using novel (boosted regression trees) and traditional (linear regression) modelling methods we compared the relative importance of abiotic (slope, aspect, elevation and soil texture) and biotic (land use and vegetation structure) factors as predictors of t-SOC and a-SOC concentration. A major difference between the two response variables was less relative importance of land use as a predictor when using t-SOC as a response variable. Therefore, ignoring the presence of charcoal would have led to an under-estimation of the effect of land-use conversion on the biologically-available SOC fraction. The presence of charcoal has important ramifications for routine assessments of soil condition given that (i) SOC is a commonly used indicator and charcoal and biologically-active SOC differ in their effects on soil properties, (ii) fires historically occur on a large area of land, (iii) charcoal is a long-lasting consequence of fires and (iv) charcoal can account for a large proportion of SOC and yet be unnoticed during sample preparation.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)264-273
    Number of pages10
    JournalEuropean Journal of Soil Science
    Volume65
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    charcoal
    soil organic carbon
    soil quality
    organic carbon
    soil
    land use
    soil condition
    vegetation structure
    soil texture
    topsoil
    sample preparation
    soil properties
    soil property

    Cite this

    @article{8f3634ea66394dc3ae9fd6d9a4701587,
    title = "Have you checked for charcoal? Assessment of soil condition using soil organic carbon",
    abstract = "Soil condition is commonly assessed by using soil organic carbon (SOC) as an indicator; however, a large proportion of the world’s soils can contain charcoal, a biologically-inert form of organic carbon. We investigated whether the presence of charcoal in soil could lead to an inaccurate assessment of soil condition when using SOC as an indicator. We sampled topsoil in a south-east Australian catchment affected by severe fires in 2003. Samples (n =100) were analysed for two SOC fractions: (i) total SOC (t-SOC, loss on ignition), which included charcoal, and (ii) biologically-active SOC (a-SOC, persulphate-oxidation), which did not contain charcoal. Using novel (boosted regression trees) and traditional (linear regression) modelling methods we compared the relative importance of abiotic (slope, aspect, elevation and soil texture) and biotic (land use and vegetation structure) factors as predictors of t-SOC and a-SOC concentration. A major difference between the two response variables was less relative importance of land use as a predictor when using t-SOC as a response variable. Therefore, ignoring the presence of charcoal would have led to an under-estimation of the effect of land-use conversion on the biologically-available SOC fraction. The presence of charcoal has important ramifications for routine assessments of soil condition given that (i) SOC is a commonly used indicator and charcoal and biologically-active SOC differ in their effects on soil properties, (ii) fires historically occur on a large area of land, (iii) charcoal is a long-lasting consequence of fires and (iv) charcoal can account for a large proportion of SOC and yet be unnoticed during sample preparation.",
    author = "Fiona DYER and Bill MAHER and Richard Norris",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1111/ejss.12125",
    language = "English",
    volume = "65",
    pages = "264--273",
    journal = "European Journal of Soil Science",
    issn = "1351-0754",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    Have you checked for charcoal? Assessment of soil condition using soil organic carbon. / DYER, Fiona; MAHER, Bill; Norris, Richard.

    In: European Journal of Soil Science, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2014, p. 264-273.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Have you checked for charcoal? Assessment of soil condition using soil organic carbon

    AU - DYER, Fiona

    AU - MAHER, Bill

    AU - Norris, Richard

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - Soil condition is commonly assessed by using soil organic carbon (SOC) as an indicator; however, a large proportion of the world’s soils can contain charcoal, a biologically-inert form of organic carbon. We investigated whether the presence of charcoal in soil could lead to an inaccurate assessment of soil condition when using SOC as an indicator. We sampled topsoil in a south-east Australian catchment affected by severe fires in 2003. Samples (n =100) were analysed for two SOC fractions: (i) total SOC (t-SOC, loss on ignition), which included charcoal, and (ii) biologically-active SOC (a-SOC, persulphate-oxidation), which did not contain charcoal. Using novel (boosted regression trees) and traditional (linear regression) modelling methods we compared the relative importance of abiotic (slope, aspect, elevation and soil texture) and biotic (land use and vegetation structure) factors as predictors of t-SOC and a-SOC concentration. A major difference between the two response variables was less relative importance of land use as a predictor when using t-SOC as a response variable. Therefore, ignoring the presence of charcoal would have led to an under-estimation of the effect of land-use conversion on the biologically-available SOC fraction. The presence of charcoal has important ramifications for routine assessments of soil condition given that (i) SOC is a commonly used indicator and charcoal and biologically-active SOC differ in their effects on soil properties, (ii) fires historically occur on a large area of land, (iii) charcoal is a long-lasting consequence of fires and (iv) charcoal can account for a large proportion of SOC and yet be unnoticed during sample preparation.

    AB - Soil condition is commonly assessed by using soil organic carbon (SOC) as an indicator; however, a large proportion of the world’s soils can contain charcoal, a biologically-inert form of organic carbon. We investigated whether the presence of charcoal in soil could lead to an inaccurate assessment of soil condition when using SOC as an indicator. We sampled topsoil in a south-east Australian catchment affected by severe fires in 2003. Samples (n =100) were analysed for two SOC fractions: (i) total SOC (t-SOC, loss on ignition), which included charcoal, and (ii) biologically-active SOC (a-SOC, persulphate-oxidation), which did not contain charcoal. Using novel (boosted regression trees) and traditional (linear regression) modelling methods we compared the relative importance of abiotic (slope, aspect, elevation and soil texture) and biotic (land use and vegetation structure) factors as predictors of t-SOC and a-SOC concentration. A major difference between the two response variables was less relative importance of land use as a predictor when using t-SOC as a response variable. Therefore, ignoring the presence of charcoal would have led to an under-estimation of the effect of land-use conversion on the biologically-available SOC fraction. The presence of charcoal has important ramifications for routine assessments of soil condition given that (i) SOC is a commonly used indicator and charcoal and biologically-active SOC differ in their effects on soil properties, (ii) fires historically occur on a large area of land, (iii) charcoal is a long-lasting consequence of fires and (iv) charcoal can account for a large proportion of SOC and yet be unnoticed during sample preparation.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895890018&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/checked-charcoal-assessment-soil-condition-using-soil-organic-carbon

    U2 - 10.1111/ejss.12125

    DO - 10.1111/ejss.12125

    M3 - Article

    VL - 65

    SP - 264

    EP - 273

    JO - European Journal of Soil Science

    JF - European Journal of Soil Science

    SN - 1351-0754

    IS - 2

    ER -