Healthy food diversity and supermarket interventions: Evidence from the Seacroft Intervention Study

Tiago FREIRE, Simon Rudkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Supermarket interventions have been a commonly used treatment for problems of fresh fruit accessibility in areas of previously limited availability, their wide ranges of healthy products and lower-prices making them seemingly perfect for promoting better diets. Empirical studies likewise fall in favour. However, this diversity also serves to give consumers opportunity to entrench bad habits and simply purchase more of the unhealthy foods they enjoy. In this paper we develop a new health index based upon UK government guidelines and look to the Seacroft Intervention Study for empirical evidence of supermarket impact thereupon. Using fixed effects unconditional quantile regression to provide robustness to our parameter estimates against covariate specification, we reinforce the message that supermarkets are not a panacea for dietary improvement. Whilst diversity increases post-intervention it is unlikely to be healthful, entrenching poor dietary habits rather than delivering improvement as intended. Careful consideration of planning policy, health education and sector regulation is needed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-138
Number of pages14
JournalFood Policy
Volume83
Early online date19 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

supermarkets
Feeding Behavior
Health Education
Habits
Fruit
Guidelines
food
Diet
Food
habits
Health
evidence
health education
raw fruit
accessibility
health promotion
purchase
fruit
planning
diet

Cite this

@article{76c8fb363aca409fb921dac486a264d1,
title = "Healthy food diversity and supermarket interventions: Evidence from the Seacroft Intervention Study",
abstract = "Supermarket interventions have been a commonly used treatment for problems of fresh fruit accessibility in areas of previously limited availability, their wide ranges of healthy products and lower-prices making them seemingly perfect for promoting better diets. Empirical studies likewise fall in favour. However, this diversity also serves to give consumers opportunity to entrench bad habits and simply purchase more of the unhealthy foods they enjoy. In this paper we develop a new health index based upon UK government guidelines and look to the Seacroft Intervention Study for empirical evidence of supermarket impact thereupon. Using fixed effects unconditional quantile regression to provide robustness to our parameter estimates against covariate specification, we reinforce the message that supermarkets are not a panacea for dietary improvement. Whilst diversity increases post-intervention it is unlikely to be healthful, entrenching poor dietary habits rather than delivering improvement as intended. Careful consideration of planning policy, health education and sector regulation is needed.",
keywords = "Supermarkets, Retail provision, Food deserts, Diet, Accessibility",
author = "Tiago FREIRE and Simon Rudkin",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.12.006",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "125--138",
journal = "Food Policy",
issn = "0306-9192",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

Healthy food diversity and supermarket interventions: Evidence from the Seacroft Intervention Study. / FREIRE, Tiago; Rudkin, Simon.

In: Food Policy, Vol. 83, 02.2019, p. 125-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Healthy food diversity and supermarket interventions: Evidence from the Seacroft Intervention Study

AU - FREIRE, Tiago

AU - Rudkin, Simon

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Supermarket interventions have been a commonly used treatment for problems of fresh fruit accessibility in areas of previously limited availability, their wide ranges of healthy products and lower-prices making them seemingly perfect for promoting better diets. Empirical studies likewise fall in favour. However, this diversity also serves to give consumers opportunity to entrench bad habits and simply purchase more of the unhealthy foods they enjoy. In this paper we develop a new health index based upon UK government guidelines and look to the Seacroft Intervention Study for empirical evidence of supermarket impact thereupon. Using fixed effects unconditional quantile regression to provide robustness to our parameter estimates against covariate specification, we reinforce the message that supermarkets are not a panacea for dietary improvement. Whilst diversity increases post-intervention it is unlikely to be healthful, entrenching poor dietary habits rather than delivering improvement as intended. Careful consideration of planning policy, health education and sector regulation is needed.

AB - Supermarket interventions have been a commonly used treatment for problems of fresh fruit accessibility in areas of previously limited availability, their wide ranges of healthy products and lower-prices making them seemingly perfect for promoting better diets. Empirical studies likewise fall in favour. However, this diversity also serves to give consumers opportunity to entrench bad habits and simply purchase more of the unhealthy foods they enjoy. In this paper we develop a new health index based upon UK government guidelines and look to the Seacroft Intervention Study for empirical evidence of supermarket impact thereupon. Using fixed effects unconditional quantile regression to provide robustness to our parameter estimates against covariate specification, we reinforce the message that supermarkets are not a panacea for dietary improvement. Whilst diversity increases post-intervention it is unlikely to be healthful, entrenching poor dietary habits rather than delivering improvement as intended. Careful consideration of planning policy, health education and sector regulation is needed.

KW - Supermarkets

KW - Retail provision

KW - Food deserts

KW - Diet

KW - Accessibility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058814076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/healthy-food-diversity-supermarket-interventions-evidence-seacroft-intervention-study

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.12.006

DO - 10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.12.006

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 125

EP - 138

JO - Food Policy

JF - Food Policy

SN - 0306-9192

ER -