@article{409fd09eadc04d4c889f103391d025b4,
title = "Higher social distress and lower psycho-social wellbeing: examining the coping capacity and health of people with hearing impairment",
abstract = "Purpose: The objectives of this paper are as follows: (1) propose an explanatory model as to how hearing disability may impact on health and (2) examine the models utility. Methods: Data were collected on the psycho-social wellbeing, disability and physical health of farmers (n = 56) participating in an intervention to manage the social impacts of hearing disability. Two models were proposed and examined using multiple hierarchical linear regression. Model 1 used self-rated quality of life and model 2 used capacity to manage hearing and listening impairments, as dependent variables. Results: The analyses found that physical measures of hearing impairment (audiograms) were not correlated with physical or mental health outcomes. However, in model 1, self-confidence and self-rated ability to manage hearing impairment were most closely associated with reduced quality of life (anxiety and diastolic blood pressure were positively associated with quality of life). In model 2, higher anxiety and reduced self-confidence were associated with decreasing ability to successfully manage ones hearing impairment. Conclusions: The findings support the explanatory model that stress is higher and wellbeing lower when the fit between the persons coping capacity and environmental demands is poor.Implications for RehabilitationThis paper demonstrates that anxiety is associated with coping with the psycho-social aspects of hearing disability.This finding has important implications for the many hearing services, which only provide assessment and devices.To negate anxiety and its long-term impacts, rehabilitation providers need to ensure people with hearing disability have the capacity to manage the psycho-social aspects of communication breakdown.",
keywords = "Coping, health, hearing, quality of life, wellbeing",
author = "Anthony HOGAN and Susan Brumby and Warwick Williams and Catherine Mercer-Grant",
note = "Funding Information: This project was funded by the National Health and Medicine Research Council (NHRMRC) Project Grant GNT 1033151. Research partners include the National Centre for Farmer Health, Deakin University, University of Canberra and the National Acoustic Laboratories. The contents of this publication do not reflect the views of the NHMRC. Funding Information: The data used to test our explanatory model were collected as part of a broader study funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (grant APP1033151). This broader study tested the extent to which participation in a program for managing the social impacts of hearing impairment could contribute to participants being more engaged in activities to prevent their exposure to harmful levels of noise. This study had ethics approval from Deakin University and The Australian National University (2011/694). Details of this study can be found on the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000075684). Briefly, farmers who self-identified as having a hearing impairment were invited to participate in the delivery of a series of workshops based on the Montreal Hearing Help Program [20] and the Sustainable Farm Families program [29–31] offered by the National Centre for Farmer Health, Victoria, Australia. Participants (n = 56) completed the following measures prior to the workshops: • Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS; 32]: as the name suggests, this well-validated and highly cited psycho-logical measure distinguishes between depression, anxiety and stress. • Easier Listening Scale [33–35]: both participants and their partners completed this scale. It assessed the social impact of hearing impairment and was derived from an initial set of indicators of hearing disability developed by Hetu and Getty [20]. • Audiometric screening: both participants and their partners underwent audiometric screening (250 Hz–8000 Hz; both ears) and otoscopic examination. • Baseline health checks: these included measures of fasting glucose and lipids (10-h fast), body mass index, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and waist circumference. A number (n = 6) of observations for lipids were missed due to malfunctioning of the testing equipment at one remote rural site. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2015 Informa UK Ltd.",
year = "2015",
month = oct,
day = "23",
doi = "10.3109/09638288.2014.996675",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "2070--2075",
journal = "Disability and Rehabilitation",
issn = "0963-8288",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "22",
}