Home Range, activity and sociality of a top predator, the dingo: A test of the resource dispersion hypothesis

Guy Anthony Ballard, Christopher R. Dickman, Peter J S Fleming, Remy Van De Ven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The idea that groups of individuals may develop around resource patches led to the formulation of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis (RDH). We tested the predictions of the RDH, within a quasi‐experimental framework, using Australia’s largest terrestrial predator, the dingo Canis lupus dingo. Average dingo group sizes were higher in areas with abundant focal food sources around two mine sites compared with those in more distant areas. This supports the notion that resource richness favours larger group size, consistent with the RDH. Irrespective of season or sex, average home range estimates and daily activity for dingoes around the mine sites were significantly less than for dingoes that lived well away. Assuming that a territory is the defended part of the home range and that territory size is correlated with home range size, consistent with the RDH, the spatial dispersion of food patches therefore determined territory size for dingoes in our study. However, although sample size was small, some dingoes that accessed the supplementary food resource at the mines also spent a large proportion of their time away, suggesting a breakdown of territorial defence around the focal food resource. This, in combination with the large variation in home range size among dingoes that accessed the same supplementary food resource, limits the predictive capabilities of the RDH for this species. We hypothesize that constraints on exclusive home range occupancy will arise if a surfeit of food resources (in excess of requirements for homeostasis) is available in a small area, and that this will have further effects on access to mates and social structure. We present a conceptual model of facultative territorial defence where focal resources are available to demonstrate our findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)914-925
Number of pages12
JournalEcography
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

dingoes
home range
predator
predators
resource
testing
food
group size
range size
test
social structure
homeostasis
prediction
gender

Cite this

Ballard, Guy Anthony ; Dickman, Christopher R. ; Fleming, Peter J S ; Van De Ven, Remy. / Home Range, activity and sociality of a top predator, the dingo: A test of the resource dispersion hypothesis. In: Ecography. 2013 ; Vol. 36, No. 8. pp. 914-925.
@article{f7486651c7c543cc94abbb3a2120635a,
title = "Home Range, activity and sociality of a top predator, the dingo: A test of the resource dispersion hypothesis",
abstract = "The idea that groups of individuals may develop around resource patches led to the formulation of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis (RDH). We tested the predictions of the RDH, within a quasi‐experimental framework, using Australia’s largest terrestrial predator, the dingo Canis lupus dingo. Average dingo group sizes were higher in areas with abundant focal food sources around two mine sites compared with those in more distant areas. This supports the notion that resource richness favours larger group size, consistent with the RDH. Irrespective of season or sex, average home range estimates and daily activity for dingoes around the mine sites were significantly less than for dingoes that lived well away. Assuming that a territory is the defended part of the home range and that territory size is correlated with home range size, consistent with the RDH, the spatial dispersion of food patches therefore determined territory size for dingoes in our study. However, although sample size was small, some dingoes that accessed the supplementary food resource at the mines also spent a large proportion of their time away, suggesting a breakdown of territorial defence around the focal food resource. This, in combination with the large variation in home range size among dingoes that accessed the same supplementary food resource, limits the predictive capabilities of the RDH for this species. We hypothesize that constraints on exclusive home range occupancy will arise if a surfeit of food resources (in excess of requirements for homeostasis) is available in a small area, and that this will have further effects on access to mates and social structure. We present a conceptual model of facultative territorial defence where focal resources are available to demonstrate our findings.",
keywords = "(blank)",
author = "Ballard, {Guy Anthony} and Dickman, {Christopher R.} and Fleming, {Peter J S} and {Van De Ven}, Remy",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00056.x",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "914--925",
journal = "Ecography",
issn = "0906-7590",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

Home Range, activity and sociality of a top predator, the dingo: A test of the resource dispersion hypothesis. / Ballard, Guy Anthony; Dickman, Christopher R.; Fleming, Peter J S; Van De Ven, Remy.

In: Ecography, Vol. 36, No. 8, 2013, p. 914-925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Home Range, activity and sociality of a top predator, the dingo: A test of the resource dispersion hypothesis

AU - Ballard, Guy Anthony

AU - Dickman, Christopher R.

AU - Fleming, Peter J S

AU - Van De Ven, Remy

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The idea that groups of individuals may develop around resource patches led to the formulation of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis (RDH). We tested the predictions of the RDH, within a quasi‐experimental framework, using Australia’s largest terrestrial predator, the dingo Canis lupus dingo. Average dingo group sizes were higher in areas with abundant focal food sources around two mine sites compared with those in more distant areas. This supports the notion that resource richness favours larger group size, consistent with the RDH. Irrespective of season or sex, average home range estimates and daily activity for dingoes around the mine sites were significantly less than for dingoes that lived well away. Assuming that a territory is the defended part of the home range and that territory size is correlated with home range size, consistent with the RDH, the spatial dispersion of food patches therefore determined territory size for dingoes in our study. However, although sample size was small, some dingoes that accessed the supplementary food resource at the mines also spent a large proportion of their time away, suggesting a breakdown of territorial defence around the focal food resource. This, in combination with the large variation in home range size among dingoes that accessed the same supplementary food resource, limits the predictive capabilities of the RDH for this species. We hypothesize that constraints on exclusive home range occupancy will arise if a surfeit of food resources (in excess of requirements for homeostasis) is available in a small area, and that this will have further effects on access to mates and social structure. We present a conceptual model of facultative territorial defence where focal resources are available to demonstrate our findings.

AB - The idea that groups of individuals may develop around resource patches led to the formulation of the Resource Dispersion Hypothesis (RDH). We tested the predictions of the RDH, within a quasi‐experimental framework, using Australia’s largest terrestrial predator, the dingo Canis lupus dingo. Average dingo group sizes were higher in areas with abundant focal food sources around two mine sites compared with those in more distant areas. This supports the notion that resource richness favours larger group size, consistent with the RDH. Irrespective of season or sex, average home range estimates and daily activity for dingoes around the mine sites were significantly less than for dingoes that lived well away. Assuming that a territory is the defended part of the home range and that territory size is correlated with home range size, consistent with the RDH, the spatial dispersion of food patches therefore determined territory size for dingoes in our study. However, although sample size was small, some dingoes that accessed the supplementary food resource at the mines also spent a large proportion of their time away, suggesting a breakdown of territorial defence around the focal food resource. This, in combination with the large variation in home range size among dingoes that accessed the same supplementary food resource, limits the predictive capabilities of the RDH for this species. We hypothesize that constraints on exclusive home range occupancy will arise if a surfeit of food resources (in excess of requirements for homeostasis) is available in a small area, and that this will have further effects on access to mates and social structure. We present a conceptual model of facultative territorial defence where focal resources are available to demonstrate our findings.

KW - (blank)

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00056.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00056.x

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 914

EP - 925

JO - Ecography

JF - Ecography

SN - 0906-7590

IS - 8

ER -