TY - JOUR
T1 - Household energy efficiency interventions
T2 - A systematic literature review
AU - McAndrew, Ryan
AU - Mulcahy, Rory
AU - Gordon, Ross
AU - Russell-Bennett, Rebekah
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was partially funded by Energy Consumers Australia ( http://www.energyconsumersaustralia.com.au/ ). The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of Energy Consumers Australia. This project was conducted by members of the Group of Energy Efficiency Researchers (GEER), Australia’s peak research body on residential energy efficiency ( https://www.geer.org.au/ ).
Funding Information:
Energy policy and associated energy efficiency programs in countries such as the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia have been identified as being inconsistent in focus (e.g. whether to address climate change, or energy security, or both), lacking in long-term orientation, failing to set clear objectives and goals, and not being informed by guidance and best practice on what the most effective types of energy efficiency interventions are (Bang, 2010; Gordon et al., 2018; Keay, 2016). Indeed, the Australian Government recently ran a national funding initiative, the Low Income Energy Efficiency Program (LIEEP), with a range of insights finding that while ?simple, actionable advice from a trusted source can deliver real energy and bill savings? (Energy Consumers Australia, 2017, p. 9), several programs ?were unable to induce uptake by landlords, despite efforts at engagement? (St Vincent de Paul Society, 2018, p. 8). The European Union (EU) also offers substantial evidence of policy development with the Energy Efficiency Directive (European Parliament, 2012), which makes member states responsible for promoting and facilitating efficient energy use by domestic customers through a range of instruments such as ?fiscal incentives; access to finance, grants or subsidies; information provision; exemplary projects; or workplace activities? (European Parliament, 2012, sec. 12).This project was partially funded by Energy Consumers Australia (http://www.energyconsumersaustralia.com.au/). The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of Energy Consumers Australia. This project was conducted by members of the Group of Energy Efficiency Researchers (GEER), Australia's peak research body on residential energy efficiency (https://www.geer.org.au/).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - Energy efficiency in the home is a major concern for households, governments and various non-government organisations. Energy efficiency has implications beyond usage and costs, with various co-benefit outcomes such as improved household health and well-being, comfort, air quality, increased productivity, energy security and improved social capital. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to examine energy efficiency interventions in advanced economies focusing on the household and determine the level of evidence regarding their effectiveness. We broadly scrutinise literature from 1990 to November 2019 to determine how theory and frameworks are used (or not used) to inform household interventions, the populations or groups of focus, which techniques and activities are used, and how outcomes are measured. We find mixed evidence to support specific types of interventions; however, when multiple techniques and activities were used, the intervention's success was more likely. We conclude with policy implications that call for more integrated and methodical explanations of interventions to better support critical decision-making for government.
AB - Energy efficiency in the home is a major concern for households, governments and various non-government organisations. Energy efficiency has implications beyond usage and costs, with various co-benefit outcomes such as improved household health and well-being, comfort, air quality, increased productivity, energy security and improved social capital. The purpose of this systematic literature review is to examine energy efficiency interventions in advanced economies focusing on the household and determine the level of evidence regarding their effectiveness. We broadly scrutinise literature from 1990 to November 2019 to determine how theory and frameworks are used (or not used) to inform household interventions, the populations or groups of focus, which techniques and activities are used, and how outcomes are measured. We find mixed evidence to support specific types of interventions; however, when multiple techniques and activities were used, the intervention's success was more likely. We conclude with policy implications that call for more integrated and methodical explanations of interventions to better support critical decision-making for government.
KW - Campaigns
KW - Effectiveness
KW - Evidence-based policy and practice (EBPP)
KW - Household energy efficiency
KW - Interventions
KW - Systematic literature review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098973823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112136
DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112136
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098973823
SN - 0301-4215
VL - 150
SP - 1
EP - 12
JO - Energy Policy
JF - Energy Policy
M1 - 112136
ER -