How Can Each Word be Irreplaceable? Is Coleridge's Claim Absurd?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article considers Coleridge’s comment that in the best poetry one cannot change a word. It compares Kant’s seemingly opposed insistence that ideas of perfection have little role in our judgments of beauty. The article proposes that these positions are actually compatible, due to the “thingly quality” (Heidegger) that pertains to the best work, its mysterious sense of finish. We have no ultimate idea what such a thing is or might do, such that it could be perfect at it. Or changed. But is the presence of this irreplaceable, thingly quality any less a matter of taste than beauty itself?
LanguageEnglish
Pages400-415
Number of pages15
JournalPhilosophy and Literature
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Cite this

@article{eccf2da4b40045dd8dd79e20a4f145ed,
title = "How Can Each Word be Irreplaceable? Is Coleridge's Claim Absurd?",
abstract = "This article considers Coleridge’s comment that in the best poetry one cannot change a word. It compares Kant’s seemingly opposed insistence that ideas of perfection have little role in our judgments of beauty. The article proposes that these positions are actually compatible, due to the “thingly quality” (Heidegger) that pertains to the best work, its mysterious sense of finish. We have no ultimate idea what such a thing is or might do, such that it could be perfect at it. Or changed. But is the presence of this irreplaceable, thingly quality any less a matter of taste than beauty itself?",
author = "Paul Magee",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1353/phl.2017.0048",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "400--415",
journal = "Philosophy and Literature",
issn = "0190-0013",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "2",

}

How Can Each Word be Irreplaceable? Is Coleridge's Claim Absurd? / Magee, Paul.

In: Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 41, No. 2, 10.2017, p. 400-415.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Can Each Word be Irreplaceable? Is Coleridge's Claim Absurd?

AU - Magee, Paul

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - This article considers Coleridge’s comment that in the best poetry one cannot change a word. It compares Kant’s seemingly opposed insistence that ideas of perfection have little role in our judgments of beauty. The article proposes that these positions are actually compatible, due to the “thingly quality” (Heidegger) that pertains to the best work, its mysterious sense of finish. We have no ultimate idea what such a thing is or might do, such that it could be perfect at it. Or changed. But is the presence of this irreplaceable, thingly quality any less a matter of taste than beauty itself?

AB - This article considers Coleridge’s comment that in the best poetry one cannot change a word. It compares Kant’s seemingly opposed insistence that ideas of perfection have little role in our judgments of beauty. The article proposes that these positions are actually compatible, due to the “thingly quality” (Heidegger) that pertains to the best work, its mysterious sense of finish. We have no ultimate idea what such a thing is or might do, such that it could be perfect at it. Or changed. But is the presence of this irreplaceable, thingly quality any less a matter of taste than beauty itself?

U2 - 10.1353/phl.2017.0048

DO - 10.1353/phl.2017.0048

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 400

EP - 415

JO - Philosophy and Literature

T2 - Philosophy and Literature

JF - Philosophy and Literature

SN - 0190-0013

IS - 2

ER -