How do different occupational factors influence total, occupational, and leisure-time physical activity?

Corneel Vandelanotte, Camille Short, Matthew Rockloff, Lee Di Millia, Ronan Kevin, Brenda HAPPELL, Duncan Mitch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: A better understanding of how occupational indicators influence physical activity levels will aid the design of workplace interventions. Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected from 1194 participants through a telephone interview in Queensland, Australia. The IPAQ-long was used to measure physical activity. Multiple logistic regression was applied to examine associations. Results: Of participants, 77.9% were employed full-time, 32.3% had professional jobs, 35.7% were engaged in shift work, 39.5% had physically-demanding jobs, and 66.1% had high physical activity levels. Participants with a physicallydemanding job were less likely to have low total (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.38) and occupational (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.25) physical activity. Technical and trade workers were less likely to report low total physical activity (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.97) compared with white-collar workers. Part-time (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.64) and shift workers (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.88) were more likely to report low leisure-time activity. Conclusions: Overall, the impact of different occupational indicators on physical activity was not strong. As expected, the greatest proportion of total physical activity was derived from occupational physical activity. No evidence was found for compensation effects whereby physically-demanding occupations lead to less leisure-time physical activity or vice versa. This study demonstrates that workplaces are important settings to intervene, and that there is scope to increase leisure-time physical activity irrespective of occupational background.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-207
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Physical Activity and Health
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Leisure Activities
Workplace
Queensland
Occupations
Logistic Models
Interviews

Cite this

Vandelanotte, C., Short, C., Rockloff, M., Di Millia, L., Kevin, R., HAPPELL, B., & Mitch, D. (2015). How do different occupational factors influence total, occupational, and leisure-time physical activity? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 12(2), 200-207. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2013-0098
Vandelanotte, Corneel ; Short, Camille ; Rockloff, Matthew ; Di Millia, Lee ; Kevin, Ronan ; HAPPELL, Brenda ; Mitch, Duncan. / How do different occupational factors influence total, occupational, and leisure-time physical activity?. In: Journal of Physical Activity and Health. 2015 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 200-207.
@article{4b5684bc149b4392a175a08683cf7b5b,
title = "How do different occupational factors influence total, occupational, and leisure-time physical activity?",
abstract = "Background: A better understanding of how occupational indicators influence physical activity levels will aid the design of workplace interventions. Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected from 1194 participants through a telephone interview in Queensland, Australia. The IPAQ-long was used to measure physical activity. Multiple logistic regression was applied to examine associations. Results: Of participants, 77.9{\%} were employed full-time, 32.3{\%} had professional jobs, 35.7{\%} were engaged in shift work, 39.5{\%} had physically-demanding jobs, and 66.1{\%} had high physical activity levels. Participants with a physicallydemanding job were less likely to have low total (OR = 0.25, 95{\%} CI = 0.17 to 0.38) and occupational (OR = 0.17, 95{\%} CI = 0.12 to 0.25) physical activity. Technical and trade workers were less likely to report low total physical activity (OR = 0.44, 95{\%} CI = 0.20 to 0.97) compared with white-collar workers. Part-time (OR = 1.74, 95{\%} CI = 1.15 to 2.64) and shift workers (OR = 1.86, 95{\%} CI = 1.21 to 2.88) were more likely to report low leisure-time activity. Conclusions: Overall, the impact of different occupational indicators on physical activity was not strong. As expected, the greatest proportion of total physical activity was derived from occupational physical activity. No evidence was found for compensation effects whereby physically-demanding occupations lead to less leisure-time physical activity or vice versa. This study demonstrates that workplaces are important settings to intervene, and that there is scope to increase leisure-time physical activity irrespective of occupational background.",
keywords = "Blue collar, Full-time, Part-time, Shift work, White collar, Workplace",
author = "Corneel Vandelanotte and Camille Short and Matthew Rockloff and {Di Millia}, Lee and Ronan Kevin and Brenda HAPPELL and Duncan Mitch",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/jpah.2013-0098",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "200--207",
journal = "Journal of Physical Activity Health",
issn = "1543-3080",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Vandelanotte, C, Short, C, Rockloff, M, Di Millia, L, Kevin, R, HAPPELL, B & Mitch, D 2015, 'How do different occupational factors influence total, occupational, and leisure-time physical activity?', Journal of Physical Activity and Health, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 200-207. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2013-0098

How do different occupational factors influence total, occupational, and leisure-time physical activity? / Vandelanotte, Corneel; Short, Camille; Rockloff, Matthew; Di Millia, Lee; Kevin, Ronan; HAPPELL, Brenda; Mitch, Duncan.

In: Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 12, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 200-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do different occupational factors influence total, occupational, and leisure-time physical activity?

AU - Vandelanotte, Corneel

AU - Short, Camille

AU - Rockloff, Matthew

AU - Di Millia, Lee

AU - Kevin, Ronan

AU - HAPPELL, Brenda

AU - Mitch, Duncan

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Background: A better understanding of how occupational indicators influence physical activity levels will aid the design of workplace interventions. Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected from 1194 participants through a telephone interview in Queensland, Australia. The IPAQ-long was used to measure physical activity. Multiple logistic regression was applied to examine associations. Results: Of participants, 77.9% were employed full-time, 32.3% had professional jobs, 35.7% were engaged in shift work, 39.5% had physically-demanding jobs, and 66.1% had high physical activity levels. Participants with a physicallydemanding job were less likely to have low total (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.38) and occupational (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.25) physical activity. Technical and trade workers were less likely to report low total physical activity (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.97) compared with white-collar workers. Part-time (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.64) and shift workers (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.88) were more likely to report low leisure-time activity. Conclusions: Overall, the impact of different occupational indicators on physical activity was not strong. As expected, the greatest proportion of total physical activity was derived from occupational physical activity. No evidence was found for compensation effects whereby physically-demanding occupations lead to less leisure-time physical activity or vice versa. This study demonstrates that workplaces are important settings to intervene, and that there is scope to increase leisure-time physical activity irrespective of occupational background.

AB - Background: A better understanding of how occupational indicators influence physical activity levels will aid the design of workplace interventions. Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected from 1194 participants through a telephone interview in Queensland, Australia. The IPAQ-long was used to measure physical activity. Multiple logistic regression was applied to examine associations. Results: Of participants, 77.9% were employed full-time, 32.3% had professional jobs, 35.7% were engaged in shift work, 39.5% had physically-demanding jobs, and 66.1% had high physical activity levels. Participants with a physicallydemanding job were less likely to have low total (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.38) and occupational (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.25) physical activity. Technical and trade workers were less likely to report low total physical activity (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.20 to 0.97) compared with white-collar workers. Part-time (OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.15 to 2.64) and shift workers (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.21 to 2.88) were more likely to report low leisure-time activity. Conclusions: Overall, the impact of different occupational indicators on physical activity was not strong. As expected, the greatest proportion of total physical activity was derived from occupational physical activity. No evidence was found for compensation effects whereby physically-demanding occupations lead to less leisure-time physical activity or vice versa. This study demonstrates that workplaces are important settings to intervene, and that there is scope to increase leisure-time physical activity irrespective of occupational background.

KW - Blue collar

KW - Full-time

KW - Part-time

KW - Shift work

KW - White collar

KW - Workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926334454&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/different-occupational-factors-influence-total-occupational-leisuretime-physical-activity

U2 - 10.1123/jpah.2013-0098

DO - 10.1123/jpah.2013-0098

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 200

EP - 207

JO - Journal of Physical Activity Health

JF - Journal of Physical Activity Health

SN - 1543-3080

IS - 2

ER -