"How do you measure up?"

Assumptins About "Obesity" and Health-Related Behaviors and Beliefs in two Australian "Obesity" Prevention Campaigns

Deborah Lupton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)
14 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of two related Australian government-sponsored “obesity” prevention campaigns, including documents produced by commercial social research companies reporting the formative research and evaluation of these campaigns. This material is critically analyzed for its underlying assumptions about weight “obesity” and the public’s health-related behaviors and beliefs. These include the following: the concept of “good health” has meaning and value that is universally shared; to be “overweight” or “obese” is to be physically unfit and at risk of higher levels of disease and early death; individuals are responsible for their own health status; individuals lack appropriate information about health risks and providing this information leads to behavior change; and information should be provided in a way that arouses concern and a belief that individuals should make a change. These assumptions are challenged from a critical sociological perspective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)32-44
Number of pages13
JournalFat Studies
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Obesity
campaign
Health
health
Health Status
Public Health
health risk
social research
Weights and Measures
health status
public health
Research
Disease
death
lack
evaluation
Values

Cite this

@article{aec27b02bb2b4987b0b2e3a8f8279393,
title = "{"}How do you measure up?{"}: Assumptins About {"}Obesity{"} and Health-Related Behaviors and Beliefs in two Australian {"}Obesity{"} Prevention Campaigns",
abstract = "This article presents an analysis of two related Australian government-sponsored “obesity” prevention campaigns, including documents produced by commercial social research companies reporting the formative research and evaluation of these campaigns. This material is critically analyzed for its underlying assumptions about weight “obesity” and the public’s health-related behaviors and beliefs. These include the following: the concept of “good health” has meaning and value that is universally shared; to be “overweight” or “obese” is to be physically unfit and at risk of higher levels of disease and early death; individuals are responsible for their own health status; individuals lack appropriate information about health risks and providing this information leads to behavior change; and information should be provided in a way that arouses concern and a belief that individuals should make a change. These assumptions are challenged from a critical sociological perspective.",
keywords = "Critical analysis, Health behaviors, Health promotion, “Obesity,” social marketing campaigns",
author = "Deborah Lupton",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/21604851.2013.784050",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "32--44",
journal = "Fat Studies",
issn = "2160-4851",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

"How do you measure up?" : Assumptins About "Obesity" and Health-Related Behaviors and Beliefs in two Australian "Obesity" Prevention Campaigns. / Lupton, Deborah.

In: Fat Studies, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2014, p. 32-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - "How do you measure up?"

T2 - Assumptins About "Obesity" and Health-Related Behaviors and Beliefs in two Australian "Obesity" Prevention Campaigns

AU - Lupton, Deborah

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This article presents an analysis of two related Australian government-sponsored “obesity” prevention campaigns, including documents produced by commercial social research companies reporting the formative research and evaluation of these campaigns. This material is critically analyzed for its underlying assumptions about weight “obesity” and the public’s health-related behaviors and beliefs. These include the following: the concept of “good health” has meaning and value that is universally shared; to be “overweight” or “obese” is to be physically unfit and at risk of higher levels of disease and early death; individuals are responsible for their own health status; individuals lack appropriate information about health risks and providing this information leads to behavior change; and information should be provided in a way that arouses concern and a belief that individuals should make a change. These assumptions are challenged from a critical sociological perspective.

AB - This article presents an analysis of two related Australian government-sponsored “obesity” prevention campaigns, including documents produced by commercial social research companies reporting the formative research and evaluation of these campaigns. This material is critically analyzed for its underlying assumptions about weight “obesity” and the public’s health-related behaviors and beliefs. These include the following: the concept of “good health” has meaning and value that is universally shared; to be “overweight” or “obese” is to be physically unfit and at risk of higher levels of disease and early death; individuals are responsible for their own health status; individuals lack appropriate information about health risks and providing this information leads to behavior change; and information should be provided in a way that arouses concern and a belief that individuals should make a change. These assumptions are challenged from a critical sociological perspective.

KW - Critical analysis

KW - Health behaviors

KW - Health promotion

KW - “Obesity,” social marketing campaigns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929576395&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/measure-up-assumptions-about-obesity-healthrelated-behaviors-beliefs-two-australian-obesity-preventi

U2 - 10.1080/21604851.2013.784050

DO - 10.1080/21604851.2013.784050

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 32

EP - 44

JO - Fat Studies

JF - Fat Studies

SN - 2160-4851

IS - 1

ER -