"How do you measure up?": Assumptins About "Obesity" and Health-Related Behaviors and Beliefs in two Australian "Obesity" Prevention Campaigns

Deborah Lupton

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    33 Citations (Scopus)
    198 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article presents an analysis of two related Australian government-sponsored “obesity” prevention campaigns, including documents produced by commercial social research companies reporting the formative research and evaluation of these campaigns. This material is critically analyzed for its underlying assumptions about weight “obesity” and the public’s health-related behaviors and beliefs. These include the following: the concept of “good health” has meaning and value that is universally shared; to be “overweight” or “obese” is to be physically unfit and at risk of higher levels of disease and early death; individuals are responsible for their own health status; individuals lack appropriate information about health risks and providing this information leads to behavior change; and information should be provided in a way that arouses concern and a belief that individuals should make a change. These assumptions are challenged from a critical sociological perspective.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)32-44
    Number of pages13
    JournalFat Studies
    Volume3
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '"How do you measure up?": Assumptins About "Obesity" and Health-Related Behaviors and Beliefs in two Australian "Obesity" Prevention Campaigns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this