How Far is it from Virginia and Rochester to Frankfurt? Public Choice as Critical Theory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public choice and critical theory constitute two very different and often mutually hostile research traditions. An opportunity for conversation across the two traditions arises inasmuch as public choice has itself demonstrated the incoherence of a politics-in particular, a democratic politics-of unconstrained rational egoism. By deploying an expanded, communicative conception of rationality, critical theory can help move public choice beyond several related impasses. Critical theory benefits from this encounter by gaining content for its currently rather abstract critiques of politics and rationality, and additional insight into the forces conducive to different kinds of rationality. More importantly, political science stands to gain an account of politics more powerful than either tradition can muster by itself.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-417
Number of pages21
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public choice
critical theory
rationality
politics
egoism
political science
conversation

Cite this

@article{32db5d8362b446a599fb4b8537fe141c,
title = "How Far is it from Virginia and Rochester to Frankfurt? Public Choice as Critical Theory",
abstract = "Public choice and critical theory constitute two very different and often mutually hostile research traditions. An opportunity for conversation across the two traditions arises inasmuch as public choice has itself demonstrated the incoherence of a politics-in particular, a democratic politics-of unconstrained rational egoism. By deploying an expanded, communicative conception of rationality, critical theory can help move public choice beyond several related impasses. Critical theory benefits from this encounter by gaining content for its currently rather abstract critiques of politics and rationality, and additional insight into the forces conducive to different kinds of rationality. More importantly, political science stands to gain an account of politics more powerful than either tradition can muster by itself.",
author = "Dryzek, {John S.}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1017/S0007123400006463",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "397--417",
journal = "British Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0007-1234",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

How Far is it from Virginia and Rochester to Frankfurt? Public Choice as Critical Theory. / Dryzek, John S.

In: British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1992, p. 397-417.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Far is it from Virginia and Rochester to Frankfurt? Public Choice as Critical Theory

AU - Dryzek, John S.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Public choice and critical theory constitute two very different and often mutually hostile research traditions. An opportunity for conversation across the two traditions arises inasmuch as public choice has itself demonstrated the incoherence of a politics-in particular, a democratic politics-of unconstrained rational egoism. By deploying an expanded, communicative conception of rationality, critical theory can help move public choice beyond several related impasses. Critical theory benefits from this encounter by gaining content for its currently rather abstract critiques of politics and rationality, and additional insight into the forces conducive to different kinds of rationality. More importantly, political science stands to gain an account of politics more powerful than either tradition can muster by itself.

AB - Public choice and critical theory constitute two very different and often mutually hostile research traditions. An opportunity for conversation across the two traditions arises inasmuch as public choice has itself demonstrated the incoherence of a politics-in particular, a democratic politics-of unconstrained rational egoism. By deploying an expanded, communicative conception of rationality, critical theory can help move public choice beyond several related impasses. Critical theory benefits from this encounter by gaining content for its currently rather abstract critiques of politics and rationality, and additional insight into the forces conducive to different kinds of rationality. More importantly, political science stands to gain an account of politics more powerful than either tradition can muster by itself.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84972270176&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0007123400006463

DO - 10.1017/S0007123400006463

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 397

EP - 417

JO - British Journal of Political Science

JF - British Journal of Political Science

SN - 0007-1234

IS - 4

ER -