How is care provided for patients with paediatric trauma and their families in Australia? A mixed-method study

Kate Curtis, Kim FOSTER, Rebecca Mitchell, Connie Van

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aim: This study describes clinical staff opinions on the availability and suitability of resources to provide trauma care to children and their families and any perceived strengths, gaps and potential interventions to strengthen care. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted in five Australian paediatric trauma centres. The trauma coordinator at each site participated in a structured interview to determine models of care and trauma activity at their site. This informed the development of an electronic survey, which sought staff opinion on child and family access to services and perceived gaps in care. Results: Five trauma coordinators were interviewed, and 214 clinicians (medical, nursing, allied health) from New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Queensland completed the survey. Each site had a trauma director and coordinator, and there was variance in resource availability. Almost all survey participants (92.5%) considered their hospital met the physical needs of injured children, 68.2% thought that the psychosocial needs of children were met and 82.1% thought that the needs of families were met. The least accessible services reported were clinical psychology/family counselling, mental health and behaviour management services. No routine follow-up support services post-discharge for the child or their families were identified. Conclusion: Staff providing care for injured children report that physical needs are better met than psychosocial needs. There is variability in resource levels across paediatric trauma centres. A coordinated model of care that provides psychosocial care both during hospitalisation and post-discharge could reduce this gap in care for injured children and their families.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)832-836
    Number of pages5
    JournalJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health
    Volume52
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Patient Care
    Pediatrics
    Wounds and Injuries
    Child Care
    Trauma Centers
    Clinical Psychology
    South Australia
    New South Wales
    Queensland
    Victoria
    Health Behavior
    Counseling
    Mental Health
    Hospitalization
    Nursing
    Interviews
    Health
    Surveys and Questionnaires

    Cite this

    Curtis, Kate ; FOSTER, Kim ; Mitchell, Rebecca ; Van, Connie. / How is care provided for patients with paediatric trauma and their families in Australia? A mixed-method study. In: Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2016 ; Vol. 52, No. 8. pp. 832-836.
    @article{2651ce627d5f44f5ae98f6c2cfb55894,
    title = "How is care provided for patients with paediatric trauma and their families in Australia? A mixed-method study",
    abstract = "Aim: This study describes clinical staff opinions on the availability and suitability of resources to provide trauma care to children and their families and any perceived strengths, gaps and potential interventions to strengthen care. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted in five Australian paediatric trauma centres. The trauma coordinator at each site participated in a structured interview to determine models of care and trauma activity at their site. This informed the development of an electronic survey, which sought staff opinion on child and family access to services and perceived gaps in care. Results: Five trauma coordinators were interviewed, and 214 clinicians (medical, nursing, allied health) from New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Queensland completed the survey. Each site had a trauma director and coordinator, and there was variance in resource availability. Almost all survey participants (92.5{\%}) considered their hospital met the physical needs of injured children, 68.2{\%} thought that the psychosocial needs of children were met and 82.1{\%} thought that the needs of families were met. The least accessible services reported were clinical psychology/family counselling, mental health and behaviour management services. No routine follow-up support services post-discharge for the child or their families were identified. Conclusion: Staff providing care for injured children report that physical needs are better met than psychosocial needs. There is variability in resource levels across paediatric trauma centres. A coordinated model of care that provides psychosocial care both during hospitalisation and post-discharge could reduce this gap in care for injured children and their families.",
    keywords = "family, injury, models of care, paediatric, psychosocial",
    author = "Kate Curtis and Kim FOSTER and Rebecca Mitchell and Connie Van",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1111/jpc.13189",
    language = "English",
    volume = "52",
    pages = "832--836",
    journal = "Australian Paediatric Journal",
    issn = "1034-4810",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "8",

    }

    How is care provided for patients with paediatric trauma and their families in Australia? A mixed-method study. / Curtis, Kate; FOSTER, Kim; Mitchell, Rebecca; Van, Connie.

    In: Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, Vol. 52, No. 8, 2016, p. 832-836.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How is care provided for patients with paediatric trauma and their families in Australia? A mixed-method study

    AU - Curtis, Kate

    AU - FOSTER, Kim

    AU - Mitchell, Rebecca

    AU - Van, Connie

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Aim: This study describes clinical staff opinions on the availability and suitability of resources to provide trauma care to children and their families and any perceived strengths, gaps and potential interventions to strengthen care. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted in five Australian paediatric trauma centres. The trauma coordinator at each site participated in a structured interview to determine models of care and trauma activity at their site. This informed the development of an electronic survey, which sought staff opinion on child and family access to services and perceived gaps in care. Results: Five trauma coordinators were interviewed, and 214 clinicians (medical, nursing, allied health) from New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Queensland completed the survey. Each site had a trauma director and coordinator, and there was variance in resource availability. Almost all survey participants (92.5%) considered their hospital met the physical needs of injured children, 68.2% thought that the psychosocial needs of children were met and 82.1% thought that the needs of families were met. The least accessible services reported were clinical psychology/family counselling, mental health and behaviour management services. No routine follow-up support services post-discharge for the child or their families were identified. Conclusion: Staff providing care for injured children report that physical needs are better met than psychosocial needs. There is variability in resource levels across paediatric trauma centres. A coordinated model of care that provides psychosocial care both during hospitalisation and post-discharge could reduce this gap in care for injured children and their families.

    AB - Aim: This study describes clinical staff opinions on the availability and suitability of resources to provide trauma care to children and their families and any perceived strengths, gaps and potential interventions to strengthen care. Methods: A mixed-method study was conducted in five Australian paediatric trauma centres. The trauma coordinator at each site participated in a structured interview to determine models of care and trauma activity at their site. This informed the development of an electronic survey, which sought staff opinion on child and family access to services and perceived gaps in care. Results: Five trauma coordinators were interviewed, and 214 clinicians (medical, nursing, allied health) from New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Queensland completed the survey. Each site had a trauma director and coordinator, and there was variance in resource availability. Almost all survey participants (92.5%) considered their hospital met the physical needs of injured children, 68.2% thought that the psychosocial needs of children were met and 82.1% thought that the needs of families were met. The least accessible services reported were clinical psychology/family counselling, mental health and behaviour management services. No routine follow-up support services post-discharge for the child or their families were identified. Conclusion: Staff providing care for injured children report that physical needs are better met than psychosocial needs. There is variability in resource levels across paediatric trauma centres. A coordinated model of care that provides psychosocial care both during hospitalisation and post-discharge could reduce this gap in care for injured children and their families.

    KW - family

    KW - injury

    KW - models of care

    KW - paediatric

    KW - psychosocial

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982256741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/care-provided-patients-paediatric-trauma-families-australia-mixedmethod-study

    U2 - 10.1111/jpc.13189

    DO - 10.1111/jpc.13189

    M3 - Article

    VL - 52

    SP - 832

    EP - 836

    JO - Australian Paediatric Journal

    JF - Australian Paediatric Journal

    SN - 1034-4810

    IS - 8

    ER -