How many conservation units are there for the endangered grassland earless dragons?

Emma Carlson, Anna MACDONALD, Aaron ADAMACK, Lisa DOUCETTE, William Osborne, Bernd GRUBER, Stephen SARRE

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Species are the most commonly recognised unit for conservation management, yet significant variation can exist below the level of taxonomic recognition and there is a lack of consensus around how a species might be defined. This definition has particular relevance when species designations are used to apportion conservation effort and when definitions might be made through legislation. Here, we use microsatellite DNA analyses to test the proposition that the last remaining populations of the endangered grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) harbour substantial cryptic genetic variation. Our study provides strong evidence that long historical isolation and the recent impacts of urbanization, have led to genetic differentiation in microsatellite DNA allele frequencies and high numbers of private alleles among three genetic clusters. This differentiation is partially concordant with previous mitochondrial DNA analyses, which show the two regions (Canberra and Monaro) where this species exists, to be reciprocally monophyletic, but differs through the identification of a third genetic cluster that splits a northern Canberra cluster from that of southern Canberra. Our data also identify a stark contrast in population genetic structure between clusters such that high levels of genetic structure are evident in the highly urbanised Canberra region but not in the largely rural Monaro region. We conclude that this species, like many reptiles, harbours considerable cryptic variation and currently comprises three distinct and discrete units. These units could be classified as separate species for the purpose of conservation under the relevant Australian and international Acts drawing management appropriate to that status.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)761-774
    Number of pages14
    JournalConservation Genetics
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    grasslands
    grassland
    Microsatellite Repeats
    DNA
    microsatellite repeats
    allele
    harbor
    Urbanization
    Reptiles
    Population Genetics
    Legislation
    urbanization
    Gene Frequency
    rural areas
    laws and regulations
    reptiles
    gene frequency
    population genetics
    conservation management
    Alleles

    Cite this

    Carlson, Emma ; MACDONALD, Anna ; ADAMACK, Aaron ; DOUCETTE, Lisa ; Osborne, William ; GRUBER, Bernd ; SARRE, Stephen. / How many conservation units are there for the endangered grassland earless dragons?. In: Conservation Genetics. 2016 ; Vol. 17, No. 4. pp. 761-774.
    @article{59e9a65d9f9e4fd99e7e91fc658730dc,
    title = "How many conservation units are there for the endangered grassland earless dragons?",
    abstract = "Species are the most commonly recognised unit for conservation management, yet significant variation can exist below the level of taxonomic recognition and there is a lack of consensus around how a species might be defined. This definition has particular relevance when species designations are used to apportion conservation effort and when definitions might be made through legislation. Here, we use microsatellite DNA analyses to test the proposition that the last remaining populations of the endangered grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) harbour substantial cryptic genetic variation. Our study provides strong evidence that long historical isolation and the recent impacts of urbanization, have led to genetic differentiation in microsatellite DNA allele frequencies and high numbers of private alleles among three genetic clusters. This differentiation is partially concordant with previous mitochondrial DNA analyses, which show the two regions (Canberra and Monaro) where this species exists, to be reciprocally monophyletic, but differs through the identification of a third genetic cluster that splits a northern Canberra cluster from that of southern Canberra. Our data also identify a stark contrast in population genetic structure between clusters such that high levels of genetic structure are evident in the highly urbanised Canberra region but not in the largely rural Monaro region. We conclude that this species, like many reptiles, harbours considerable cryptic variation and currently comprises three distinct and discrete units. These units could be classified as separate species for the purpose of conservation under the relevant Australian and international Acts drawing management appropriate to that status.",
    keywords = "Conservation units Evolutionary significant, units Microsatellite DNA Temperate grasslands, Conservation units, Microsatellite DNA, Temperate grasslands, Evolutionary significant units",
    author = "Emma Carlson and Anna MACDONALD and Aaron ADAMACK and Lisa DOUCETTE and William Osborne and Bernd GRUBER and Stephen SARRE",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1007/s10592-016-0819-4",
    language = "English",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "761--774",
    journal = "Conservation Genetics",
    issn = "1566-0621",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "4",

    }

    How many conservation units are there for the endangered grassland earless dragons? / Carlson, Emma; MACDONALD, Anna; ADAMACK, Aaron; DOUCETTE, Lisa; Osborne, William; GRUBER, Bernd; SARRE, Stephen.

    In: Conservation Genetics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2016, p. 761-774.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - How many conservation units are there for the endangered grassland earless dragons?

    AU - Carlson, Emma

    AU - MACDONALD, Anna

    AU - ADAMACK, Aaron

    AU - DOUCETTE, Lisa

    AU - Osborne, William

    AU - GRUBER, Bernd

    AU - SARRE, Stephen

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Species are the most commonly recognised unit for conservation management, yet significant variation can exist below the level of taxonomic recognition and there is a lack of consensus around how a species might be defined. This definition has particular relevance when species designations are used to apportion conservation effort and when definitions might be made through legislation. Here, we use microsatellite DNA analyses to test the proposition that the last remaining populations of the endangered grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) harbour substantial cryptic genetic variation. Our study provides strong evidence that long historical isolation and the recent impacts of urbanization, have led to genetic differentiation in microsatellite DNA allele frequencies and high numbers of private alleles among three genetic clusters. This differentiation is partially concordant with previous mitochondrial DNA analyses, which show the two regions (Canberra and Monaro) where this species exists, to be reciprocally monophyletic, but differs through the identification of a third genetic cluster that splits a northern Canberra cluster from that of southern Canberra. Our data also identify a stark contrast in population genetic structure between clusters such that high levels of genetic structure are evident in the highly urbanised Canberra region but not in the largely rural Monaro region. We conclude that this species, like many reptiles, harbours considerable cryptic variation and currently comprises three distinct and discrete units. These units could be classified as separate species for the purpose of conservation under the relevant Australian and international Acts drawing management appropriate to that status.

    AB - Species are the most commonly recognised unit for conservation management, yet significant variation can exist below the level of taxonomic recognition and there is a lack of consensus around how a species might be defined. This definition has particular relevance when species designations are used to apportion conservation effort and when definitions might be made through legislation. Here, we use microsatellite DNA analyses to test the proposition that the last remaining populations of the endangered grassland earless dragon (Tympanocryptis pinguicolla) harbour substantial cryptic genetic variation. Our study provides strong evidence that long historical isolation and the recent impacts of urbanization, have led to genetic differentiation in microsatellite DNA allele frequencies and high numbers of private alleles among three genetic clusters. This differentiation is partially concordant with previous mitochondrial DNA analyses, which show the two regions (Canberra and Monaro) where this species exists, to be reciprocally monophyletic, but differs through the identification of a third genetic cluster that splits a northern Canberra cluster from that of southern Canberra. Our data also identify a stark contrast in population genetic structure between clusters such that high levels of genetic structure are evident in the highly urbanised Canberra region but not in the largely rural Monaro region. We conclude that this species, like many reptiles, harbours considerable cryptic variation and currently comprises three distinct and discrete units. These units could be classified as separate species for the purpose of conservation under the relevant Australian and international Acts drawing management appropriate to that status.

    KW - Conservation units Evolutionary significant

    KW - units Microsatellite DNA Temperate grasslands

    KW - Conservation units

    KW - Microsatellite DNA

    KW - Temperate grasslands

    KW - Evolutionary significant units

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84957631622&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/conservation-units-endangered-grassland-earless-dragons

    U2 - 10.1007/s10592-016-0819-4

    DO - 10.1007/s10592-016-0819-4

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 761

    EP - 774

    JO - Conservation Genetics

    JF - Conservation Genetics

    SN - 1566-0621

    IS - 4

    ER -