How optimal was the Sydney Metro contract?: Comparison with international best practice

Cameron GORDON, Corinne Mulley, Nick Stevens, Rhonda Daniels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The New South Wales (NSW) government created the Sydney Metro Authority to design, build and operate a completely separate underground Metro rail system to supplement the existing public transport network in Sydney. By the time the NSW government abruptly cancelled the entire Metro project in early 2010, the Authority had conceived and designed a contract that was proceeding to procurement. This paper compares the elements of the proposed Sydney Metro contract to findings of the literature on optimal contracting and optimal incentives and on PPP best practice. The paper concludes that the Metro seems to have at least implicitly drawn fairly heavily on best practices and principles, but that its ultimate failure to be implemented is an instructive lesson about how operating environment can impede integration of useful knowledge and experience.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-246
Number of pages8
JournalResearch in Transportation Economics
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

best practice
transport network
public transport
supplement
Rails
incentive
knowledge
experience
Authority
Best practice
Wales
Government
time
literature
Procurement
Public transport
Contracting
Design/build
Incentives
Rail

Cite this

GORDON, Cameron ; Mulley, Corinne ; Stevens, Nick ; Daniels, Rhonda. / How optimal was the Sydney Metro contract?: Comparison with international best practice. In: Research in Transportation Economics. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 239-246.
@article{a56d0e68caee41efb7a625c5aca5dbd9,
title = "How optimal was the Sydney Metro contract?: Comparison with international best practice",
abstract = "The New South Wales (NSW) government created the Sydney Metro Authority to design, build and operate a completely separate underground Metro rail system to supplement the existing public transport network in Sydney. By the time the NSW government abruptly cancelled the entire Metro project in early 2010, the Authority had conceived and designed a contract that was proceeding to procurement. This paper compares the elements of the proposed Sydney Metro contract to findings of the literature on optimal contracting and optimal incentives and on PPP best practice. The paper concludes that the Metro seems to have at least implicitly drawn fairly heavily on best practices and principles, but that its ultimate failure to be implemented is an instructive lesson about how operating environment can impede integration of useful knowledge and experience.",
keywords = "PPP, Contracting, Private-public partnerships, Best practice",
author = "Cameron GORDON and Corinne Mulley and Nick Stevens and Rhonda Daniels",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.020",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "239--246",
journal = "Research in Transportation Economics",
issn = "0739-8859",
publisher = "JAI Press",
number = "1",

}

How optimal was the Sydney Metro contract?: Comparison with international best practice. / GORDON, Cameron; Mulley, Corinne; Stevens, Nick; Daniels, Rhonda.

In: Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2013, p. 239-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How optimal was the Sydney Metro contract?: Comparison with international best practice

AU - GORDON, Cameron

AU - Mulley, Corinne

AU - Stevens, Nick

AU - Daniels, Rhonda

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The New South Wales (NSW) government created the Sydney Metro Authority to design, build and operate a completely separate underground Metro rail system to supplement the existing public transport network in Sydney. By the time the NSW government abruptly cancelled the entire Metro project in early 2010, the Authority had conceived and designed a contract that was proceeding to procurement. This paper compares the elements of the proposed Sydney Metro contract to findings of the literature on optimal contracting and optimal incentives and on PPP best practice. The paper concludes that the Metro seems to have at least implicitly drawn fairly heavily on best practices and principles, but that its ultimate failure to be implemented is an instructive lesson about how operating environment can impede integration of useful knowledge and experience.

AB - The New South Wales (NSW) government created the Sydney Metro Authority to design, build and operate a completely separate underground Metro rail system to supplement the existing public transport network in Sydney. By the time the NSW government abruptly cancelled the entire Metro project in early 2010, the Authority had conceived and designed a contract that was proceeding to procurement. This paper compares the elements of the proposed Sydney Metro contract to findings of the literature on optimal contracting and optimal incentives and on PPP best practice. The paper concludes that the Metro seems to have at least implicitly drawn fairly heavily on best practices and principles, but that its ultimate failure to be implemented is an instructive lesson about how operating environment can impede integration of useful knowledge and experience.

KW - PPP

KW - Contracting

KW - Private-public partnerships

KW - Best practice

UR - https://researchsystem.canberra.edu.au/admin/files/9016494/2013000533.pdf

U2 - 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.020

DO - 10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.020

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 239

EP - 246

JO - Research in Transportation Economics

JF - Research in Transportation Economics

SN - 0739-8859

IS - 1

ER -