How to Renew a Deliberative Democracy

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter asks how political systems with deep-rooted democratic pathologies can be rebooted in a more deliberative direction, taking stock of the prospects for democratic repair and renewal in light of our analysis in the preceding chapters. It begins with possible reform of the representative institutions of liberal democratic states, in light of the fact that states with consensus institutions have higher quality public deliberation and stronger defenses against transgressions than do adversarial systems. Next the chapter examines how institutional democratic innovations such as mini-publics can contribute to democratic renewal, before exploring possibilities for more deliberative politicians and parties. Finally we take a citizen-centric view and discuss how a discursive infrastructure combining old and new media with personal networks and political activism can support democratic viability and vitality. A deliberative systems perspective means that no single institution or specific factor will drive democratic renewal, which rather depends on the interplay of the various factors we identify. Since this is not easy to imagine in the abstract, we apply this framework to an unhealthy system – the United States – and healthier ones – Germany and Switzerland. We finish with some take-home lessons for diabolical times.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDeliberative Democracy for Diabolical Times
    Subtitle of host publicationConfronting Populism, Extremism, Denial, and Authoritarianism
    EditorsAndré Bächtiger , John S. Dryzek
    Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Chapter9
    Pages186-220
    Number of pages34
    ISBN (Print)9781009261845
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2024

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How to Renew a Deliberative Democracy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this