How useful are Primary Care Service Areas? Evaluating PCSAs as a tool for measuring Primary Care Practitioner access

Soumya MAZUMDAR, Danielle Butler, Nasser Bagheri, Paul Konings, Federico Girosi, Xiaoqi Feng, Ian McRae

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The appropriate delivery of primary care services, an important policy imperative in many developed nations, is contingent on defining appropriate geographies to which these services are delivered. Primary Care Service Area (PCSA) geographies have been created in some countries to facilitate primary care policy making and have been utilized in a large body of research. In spite of their extensive use across rural and urban settings, the usefulness of PCSAs has not been evaluated. In this study, for the first time we put PCSAs to the test by comparing them to another small area geography - Postal Areas, and by exploring their usefulness in measuring relationships between Primary Care Practitioner supply and use. We find while PCSAs are better than Postal Areas in measuring relationships between General Practitioner supply and visits by patients, this relationship shows some heterogeneity across areas.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)47-54
    Number of pages8
    JournalApplied Geography
    Volume72
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How useful are Primary Care Service Areas? Evaluating PCSAs as a tool for measuring Primary Care Practitioner access'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this