TY - JOUR
T1 - Human Activity Recognition with Accelerometer and Gyroscope
T2 - a Data Fusion Approach
AU - Webber, Mitchell
AU - Fernandez Rojas, Raul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2001-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - This paper compares the three levels of data fusion with the goal of determining the optimal level of data fusion for multi-sensor human activity data. Using the data processing pipeline, gyroscope and accelerometer data was fused at the sensor-level, feature-level and decision-level. For each level of data fusion four different techniques were used with varying levels of success. This analysis was performed on four human activity publicly-available datasets along with four well-known machine learning classifiers to validate the results. The decision-level fusion (Acc = 0.7443±0.0850) outperformed the other two levels of fusion in regards to accuracy, sensor level (Acc = 0.5934 ± 0.1110) and feature level (Acc = 0.6742 ± 0.0053), but, the processing time and computational power required for training and classification were far greater than practical for a HAR system. However, Kalman filter appear to be the more efficient method, since it exhibited both good accuracy (Acc = 0.7536 ± 0.1566) and short processing time (time = 61.71ms ± 63.85); properties that play a large role in real-time applications using wearable devices. The results of this study also serve as baseline information in the HAR literature to compare future methods of data fusion.
AB - This paper compares the three levels of data fusion with the goal of determining the optimal level of data fusion for multi-sensor human activity data. Using the data processing pipeline, gyroscope and accelerometer data was fused at the sensor-level, feature-level and decision-level. For each level of data fusion four different techniques were used with varying levels of success. This analysis was performed on four human activity publicly-available datasets along with four well-known machine learning classifiers to validate the results. The decision-level fusion (Acc = 0.7443±0.0850) outperformed the other two levels of fusion in regards to accuracy, sensor level (Acc = 0.5934 ± 0.1110) and feature level (Acc = 0.6742 ± 0.0053), but, the processing time and computational power required for training and classification were far greater than practical for a HAR system. However, Kalman filter appear to be the more efficient method, since it exhibited both good accuracy (Acc = 0.7536 ± 0.1566) and short processing time (time = 61.71ms ± 63.85); properties that play a large role in real-time applications using wearable devices. The results of this study also serve as baseline information in the HAR literature to compare future methods of data fusion.
KW - Sensors , Accelerometers , Gyroscopes , Sensor fusion , Data integration , Wearable sensors , Intelligent sensors
U2 - 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3079883
DO - 10.1109/JSEN.2021.3079883
M3 - Article
SN - 1558-1748
VL - 21
SP - 16979
EP - 16989
JO - IEEE Sensors Journal
JF - IEEE Sensors Journal
IS - 15
ER -