Human Resource Management in a State-owned and Private Enterprises in Indonesia

Wahyu Sutiyono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares the management of human resources (HRM) in two large, modern sector business organisations, one state-owned and the other privately owned, in the context of the rapidly deregulated Indonesian economy of the mid-1990s. The two organisations differed greatly in the extent to which HRM was able to underpin the efficient management of the organisation. Owing to fundamentally different approaches to recruitment, training and development, employee performance management and remuneration, the state-owned enterprise had far less effective HRM than its private sector counterpart, and could learn a great deal from how the privately owned organisation responded to the challenges presented by deregulation. The findings suggest that firm effectiveness depends significantly on the HRM function, and that the performance of state-owned enterprises tends to suffer as a result of interference in HRM processes by their government owners
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-394
Number of pages18
JournalBulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

private enterprise
human resource management
human resource
Indonesia
state owned enterprise
resource management
management
remuneration
deregulation
human resources
private sector
performance
interference
employee
firm
economy
Private enterprise
Human resource management
State-owned enterprises
Deregulation

Cite this

@article{9e7ab88022984f27bdd59e1683197c92,
title = "Human Resource Management in a State-owned and Private Enterprises in Indonesia",
abstract = "This paper compares the management of human resources (HRM) in two large, modern sector business organisations, one state-owned and the other privately owned, in the context of the rapidly deregulated Indonesian economy of the mid-1990s. The two organisations differed greatly in the extent to which HRM was able to underpin the efficient management of the organisation. Owing to fundamentally different approaches to recruitment, training and development, employee performance management and remuneration, the state-owned enterprise had far less effective HRM than its private sector counterpart, and could learn a great deal from how the privately owned organisation responded to the challenges presented by deregulation. The findings suggest that firm effectiveness depends significantly on the HRM function, and that the performance of state-owned enterprises tends to suffer as a result of interference in HRM processes by their government owners",
author = "Wahyu Sutiyono",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1080/00074910701727621",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "377--394",
journal = "Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies",
issn = "0007-4918",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Human Resource Management in a State-owned and Private Enterprises in Indonesia. / Sutiyono, Wahyu.

In: Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2007, p. 377-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human Resource Management in a State-owned and Private Enterprises in Indonesia

AU - Sutiyono, Wahyu

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This paper compares the management of human resources (HRM) in two large, modern sector business organisations, one state-owned and the other privately owned, in the context of the rapidly deregulated Indonesian economy of the mid-1990s. The two organisations differed greatly in the extent to which HRM was able to underpin the efficient management of the organisation. Owing to fundamentally different approaches to recruitment, training and development, employee performance management and remuneration, the state-owned enterprise had far less effective HRM than its private sector counterpart, and could learn a great deal from how the privately owned organisation responded to the challenges presented by deregulation. The findings suggest that firm effectiveness depends significantly on the HRM function, and that the performance of state-owned enterprises tends to suffer as a result of interference in HRM processes by their government owners

AB - This paper compares the management of human resources (HRM) in two large, modern sector business organisations, one state-owned and the other privately owned, in the context of the rapidly deregulated Indonesian economy of the mid-1990s. The two organisations differed greatly in the extent to which HRM was able to underpin the efficient management of the organisation. Owing to fundamentally different approaches to recruitment, training and development, employee performance management and remuneration, the state-owned enterprise had far less effective HRM than its private sector counterpart, and could learn a great deal from how the privately owned organisation responded to the challenges presented by deregulation. The findings suggest that firm effectiveness depends significantly on the HRM function, and that the performance of state-owned enterprises tends to suffer as a result of interference in HRM processes by their government owners

U2 - 10.1080/00074910701727621

DO - 10.1080/00074910701727621

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 377

EP - 394

JO - Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies

JF - Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies

SN - 0007-4918

IS - 3

ER -