“I can’t get past the fact that it is printed”

consumer attitudes to 3D printed food

Deborah Lupton, Bethaney Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In recent years, 3D printing technologies have been developed to process a range of food products. Thus far, no academic research has attempted to gauge what people make of the different types of 3D printed food products and how receptive they may be to using a 3D food printer and consuming the food it makes. To address these questions, a qualitative study was conducted with Australians, using the method of an online discussion forum in which they were asked to respond to images of 3D printed food products. It found that the key attributes influencing participants’ responses to each food item were: the content of the food; its appearance; the assumed sensory qualities of the food; to what extent it was assessed to be “real” or “food-like”; and considerations of how much processing the food had gone through. The findings suggest that those entrepreneurs or organizations which wish to promote 3D food printing technologies need to consider these attributes in their efforts to encourage people to accept the technologies and their products.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)402-418
Number of pages17
JournalFood, Culture and Society
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

consumer attitudes
foods
food
Food
printers
entrepreneurship
gauges
food processing
food quality
printing technology
Technology
Food Quality
Food Handling
Food Technology
printer
entrepreneur
methodology

Cite this

@article{41964ea8e34a4041abf16c3ef1c4195d,
title = "“I can’t get past the fact that it is printed”: consumer attitudes to 3D printed food",
abstract = "In recent years, 3D printing technologies have been developed to process a range of food products. Thus far, no academic research has attempted to gauge what people make of the different types of 3D printed food products and how receptive they may be to using a 3D food printer and consuming the food it makes. To address these questions, a qualitative study was conducted with Australians, using the method of an online discussion forum in which they were asked to respond to images of 3D printed food products. It found that the key attributes influencing participants’ responses to each food item were: the content of the food; its appearance; the assumed sensory qualities of the food; to what extent it was assessed to be “real” or “food-like”; and considerations of how much processing the food had gone through. The findings suggest that those entrepreneurs or organizations which wish to promote 3D food printing technologies need to consider these attributes in their efforts to encourage people to accept the technologies and their products.",
keywords = "3D printing, consumers, digital technologies, food, novel food technologies, sociocultural perspectives",
author = "Deborah Lupton and Bethaney Turner",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/15528014.2018.1451044",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "402--418",
journal = "Food, Culture and Society",
issn = "1552-8014",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

“I can’t get past the fact that it is printed” : consumer attitudes to 3D printed food. / Lupton, Deborah; Turner, Bethaney.

In: Food, Culture and Society, Vol. 21, No. 3, 04.04.2018, p. 402-418.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “I can’t get past the fact that it is printed”

T2 - consumer attitudes to 3D printed food

AU - Lupton, Deborah

AU - Turner, Bethaney

PY - 2018/4/4

Y1 - 2018/4/4

N2 - In recent years, 3D printing technologies have been developed to process a range of food products. Thus far, no academic research has attempted to gauge what people make of the different types of 3D printed food products and how receptive they may be to using a 3D food printer and consuming the food it makes. To address these questions, a qualitative study was conducted with Australians, using the method of an online discussion forum in which they were asked to respond to images of 3D printed food products. It found that the key attributes influencing participants’ responses to each food item were: the content of the food; its appearance; the assumed sensory qualities of the food; to what extent it was assessed to be “real” or “food-like”; and considerations of how much processing the food had gone through. The findings suggest that those entrepreneurs or organizations which wish to promote 3D food printing technologies need to consider these attributes in their efforts to encourage people to accept the technologies and their products.

AB - In recent years, 3D printing technologies have been developed to process a range of food products. Thus far, no academic research has attempted to gauge what people make of the different types of 3D printed food products and how receptive they may be to using a 3D food printer and consuming the food it makes. To address these questions, a qualitative study was conducted with Australians, using the method of an online discussion forum in which they were asked to respond to images of 3D printed food products. It found that the key attributes influencing participants’ responses to each food item were: the content of the food; its appearance; the assumed sensory qualities of the food; to what extent it was assessed to be “real” or “food-like”; and considerations of how much processing the food had gone through. The findings suggest that those entrepreneurs or organizations which wish to promote 3D food printing technologies need to consider these attributes in their efforts to encourage people to accept the technologies and their products.

KW - 3D printing

KW - consumers

KW - digital technologies

KW - food

KW - novel food technologies

KW - sociocultural perspectives

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044967309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/i-cant-past-fact-it-printed-consumer-attitudes-3d-printed-food

U2 - 10.1080/15528014.2018.1451044

DO - 10.1080/15528014.2018.1451044

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 402

EP - 418

JO - Food, Culture and Society

JF - Food, Culture and Society

SN - 1552-8014

IS - 3

ER -