“I don't think we've quite got there yet”

The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers

Brenda Happell, Brett Scholz, Sarah Gordon, Julia Bocking, Pete Ellis, Cath Roper, Jackie Liggins, Chris Platania-Phung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

What is known of the subject: Consumer participation in mental health services is an expectation articulated through mental health policy. Consumers as researchers could contribute significantly to mental health services. Barriers to participation are significant and limit consumer involvement. What the paper adds to existing knowledge: Enhanced understandings of collaborative relationships between consumer and nonconsumer researchers. Researchers from the health disciplines find value in consumer involvement in mental health research. These researchers can support and facilitate consumer research by being allies to consumer researchers. What are the implications for practice: Understanding the role of allies is necessary to strengthen their capacity to support consumer researchers. Involving consumers in mental health research is likely to lead to improved practice. Abstract: Introduction Australia and New Zealand mental health policy requires consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Systemic participation informs and improves the quality of mental health services. Collaboration with consumer researchers should be similarly required. Enhanced understandings of collaborations are needed. Aim To enhance understanding of the perspectives and experiences of nonconsumer researchers in working collaboratively with consumers as researchers. Method This qualitative exploratory study involved interviews with nonconsumer mental health researchers who have worked collaboratively with consumers in research. Interviews were conducted with participants from Australia and New Zealand. Results “Allyship” emerged as a major theme. This describes nonconsumer researchers playing an actively supportive role to facilitate opportunities for the development and growth of consumer research roles and activities. Seven subthemes were identified: establishing and supporting roles, corralling resources, guiding navigation of university systems, advocacy at multiple levels, aspiring to coproduction and consumer-led research, extending connections and partnerships, and desire to do better. Discussion Allyship may have an important role to play in the broader consumer research agenda and requires further consideration. Implications for practice Embedding meaningful consumer participation within mental health services requires active consumer involvement in research. Allies can play an important facilitative role.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-462
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing
Volume25
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Mental Health
Research Personnel
Mental Health Services
Research
Health Policy
New Zealand
Interviews
Growth and Development
Community Participation
Health

Cite this

Happell, Brenda ; Scholz, Brett ; Gordon, Sarah ; Bocking, Julia ; Ellis, Pete ; Roper, Cath ; Liggins, Jackie ; Platania-Phung, Chris. / “I don't think we've quite got there yet” : The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers. In: Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2018 ; Vol. 25, No. 8. pp. 453-462.
@article{84a051d5ba6843dc85eda5d80ba1b885,
title = "“I don't think we've quite got there yet”: The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers",
abstract = "What is known of the subject: Consumer participation in mental health services is an expectation articulated through mental health policy. Consumers as researchers could contribute significantly to mental health services. Barriers to participation are significant and limit consumer involvement. What the paper adds to existing knowledge: Enhanced understandings of collaborative relationships between consumer and nonconsumer researchers. Researchers from the health disciplines find value in consumer involvement in mental health research. These researchers can support and facilitate consumer research by being allies to consumer researchers. What are the implications for practice: Understanding the role of allies is necessary to strengthen their capacity to support consumer researchers. Involving consumers in mental health research is likely to lead to improved practice. Abstract: Introduction Australia and New Zealand mental health policy requires consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Systemic participation informs and improves the quality of mental health services. Collaboration with consumer researchers should be similarly required. Enhanced understandings of collaborations are needed. Aim To enhance understanding of the perspectives and experiences of nonconsumer researchers in working collaboratively with consumers as researchers. Method This qualitative exploratory study involved interviews with nonconsumer mental health researchers who have worked collaboratively with consumers in research. Interviews were conducted with participants from Australia and New Zealand. Results “Allyship” emerged as a major theme. This describes nonconsumer researchers playing an actively supportive role to facilitate opportunities for the development and growth of consumer research roles and activities. Seven subthemes were identified: establishing and supporting roles, corralling resources, guiding navigation of university systems, advocacy at multiple levels, aspiring to coproduction and consumer-led research, extending connections and partnerships, and desire to do better. Discussion Allyship may have an important role to play in the broader consumer research agenda and requires further consideration. Implications for practice Embedding meaningful consumer participation within mental health services requires active consumer involvement in research. Allies can play an important facilitative role.",
keywords = "allies and allyship, consumer, mental health, research, Humans, Male, Community Participation, Health Services Research, New Zealand, Mental Health Services, Adult, Female, Qualitative Research, Australia",
author = "Brenda Happell and Brett Scholz and Sarah Gordon and Julia Bocking and Pete Ellis and Cath Roper and Jackie Liggins and Chris Platania-Phung",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/jpm.12476",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "453--462",
journal = "Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing",
issn = "1351-0126",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

Happell, B, Scholz, B, Gordon, S, Bocking, J, Ellis, P, Roper, C, Liggins, J & Platania-Phung, C 2018, '“I don't think we've quite got there yet”: The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers', Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.12476

“I don't think we've quite got there yet” : The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers. / Happell, Brenda; Scholz, Brett; Gordon, Sarah; Bocking, Julia; Ellis, Pete; Roper, Cath; Liggins, Jackie; Platania-Phung, Chris.

In: Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 25, No. 8, 2018, p. 453-462.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “I don't think we've quite got there yet”

T2 - The experience of allyship for mental health consumer researchers

AU - Happell, Brenda

AU - Scholz, Brett

AU - Gordon, Sarah

AU - Bocking, Julia

AU - Ellis, Pete

AU - Roper, Cath

AU - Liggins, Jackie

AU - Platania-Phung, Chris

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - What is known of the subject: Consumer participation in mental health services is an expectation articulated through mental health policy. Consumers as researchers could contribute significantly to mental health services. Barriers to participation are significant and limit consumer involvement. What the paper adds to existing knowledge: Enhanced understandings of collaborative relationships between consumer and nonconsumer researchers. Researchers from the health disciplines find value in consumer involvement in mental health research. These researchers can support and facilitate consumer research by being allies to consumer researchers. What are the implications for practice: Understanding the role of allies is necessary to strengthen their capacity to support consumer researchers. Involving consumers in mental health research is likely to lead to improved practice. Abstract: Introduction Australia and New Zealand mental health policy requires consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Systemic participation informs and improves the quality of mental health services. Collaboration with consumer researchers should be similarly required. Enhanced understandings of collaborations are needed. Aim To enhance understanding of the perspectives and experiences of nonconsumer researchers in working collaboratively with consumers as researchers. Method This qualitative exploratory study involved interviews with nonconsumer mental health researchers who have worked collaboratively with consumers in research. Interviews were conducted with participants from Australia and New Zealand. Results “Allyship” emerged as a major theme. This describes nonconsumer researchers playing an actively supportive role to facilitate opportunities for the development and growth of consumer research roles and activities. Seven subthemes were identified: establishing and supporting roles, corralling resources, guiding navigation of university systems, advocacy at multiple levels, aspiring to coproduction and consumer-led research, extending connections and partnerships, and desire to do better. Discussion Allyship may have an important role to play in the broader consumer research agenda and requires further consideration. Implications for practice Embedding meaningful consumer participation within mental health services requires active consumer involvement in research. Allies can play an important facilitative role.

AB - What is known of the subject: Consumer participation in mental health services is an expectation articulated through mental health policy. Consumers as researchers could contribute significantly to mental health services. Barriers to participation are significant and limit consumer involvement. What the paper adds to existing knowledge: Enhanced understandings of collaborative relationships between consumer and nonconsumer researchers. Researchers from the health disciplines find value in consumer involvement in mental health research. These researchers can support and facilitate consumer research by being allies to consumer researchers. What are the implications for practice: Understanding the role of allies is necessary to strengthen their capacity to support consumer researchers. Involving consumers in mental health research is likely to lead to improved practice. Abstract: Introduction Australia and New Zealand mental health policy requires consumer participation in all aspects of mental health services. Systemic participation informs and improves the quality of mental health services. Collaboration with consumer researchers should be similarly required. Enhanced understandings of collaborations are needed. Aim To enhance understanding of the perspectives and experiences of nonconsumer researchers in working collaboratively with consumers as researchers. Method This qualitative exploratory study involved interviews with nonconsumer mental health researchers who have worked collaboratively with consumers in research. Interviews were conducted with participants from Australia and New Zealand. Results “Allyship” emerged as a major theme. This describes nonconsumer researchers playing an actively supportive role to facilitate opportunities for the development and growth of consumer research roles and activities. Seven subthemes were identified: establishing and supporting roles, corralling resources, guiding navigation of university systems, advocacy at multiple levels, aspiring to coproduction and consumer-led research, extending connections and partnerships, and desire to do better. Discussion Allyship may have an important role to play in the broader consumer research agenda and requires further consideration. Implications for practice Embedding meaningful consumer participation within mental health services requires active consumer involvement in research. Allies can play an important facilitative role.

KW - allies and allyship

KW - consumer

KW - mental health

KW - research

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Community Participation

KW - Health Services Research

KW - New Zealand

KW - Mental Health Services

KW - Adult

KW - Female

KW - Qualitative Research

KW - Australia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054825133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/i-dont-think-weve-quite-experience-allyship-mental-health-consumer-researchers

U2 - 10.1111/jpm.12476

DO - 10.1111/jpm.12476

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 453

EP - 462

JO - Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

JF - Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

SN - 1351-0126

IS - 8

ER -