Identifying attitudes to welfare through deliberative forums

the emergence of reluctant individualism

Peter Taylor-Gooby, Benjamin LERUTH, Heejung Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article uses deliberative forums to examine attitudes to UK welfare futures. It makes methodological, empirical and theoretical contributions to the field. We demonstrate the value of the approach, provide insights into attitudes, in particular about priorities and how people link ideas together, and show how the UK’s neoliberal market-centredness fits with enthusiasm for state healthcare and pensions, desire to close national labour markets to immigrants and approval of government interventions to expand opportunities for those who make the effort. Findings point to the strength of the work ethic and individual responsibility alongside a regret that major and highly valued state services appear unsustainable, the construction of immigrants as simultaneously a burden on provision and unfair labour-market competitors, and backing for the development of a ‘new risk’ welfare state through social investment. The study reveals the complexity of responses to current challenges in an increasingly liberal-leaning welfare state.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-114
Number of pages18
JournalPolicy & Politics
Volume47
Issue number1
Early online date12 Jan 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

individualism
labor market
welfare state
welfare
immigrant
social investment
pension
ethics
health care
moral philosophy
responsibility
market
Values
approval
services

Cite this

Taylor-Gooby, Peter ; LERUTH, Benjamin ; Chung, Heejung. / Identifying attitudes to welfare through deliberative forums : the emergence of reluctant individualism. In: Policy & Politics. 2019 ; Vol. 47, No. 1. pp. 97-114.
@article{ca42e7b6cedf4b848f6782015209b3c2,
title = "Identifying attitudes to welfare through deliberative forums: the emergence of reluctant individualism",
abstract = "This article uses deliberative forums to examine attitudes to UK welfare futures. It makes methodological, empirical and theoretical contributions to the field. We demonstrate the value of the approach, provide insights into attitudes, in particular about priorities and how people link ideas together, and show how the UK’s neoliberal market-centredness fits with enthusiasm for state healthcare and pensions, desire to close national labour markets to immigrants and approval of government interventions to expand opportunities for those who make the effort. Findings point to the strength of the work ethic and individual responsibility alongside a regret that major and highly valued state services appear unsustainable, the construction of immigrants as simultaneously a burden on provision and unfair labour-market competitors, and backing for the development of a ‘new risk’ welfare state through social investment. The study reveals the complexity of responses to current challenges in an increasingly liberal-leaning welfare state.",
keywords = "welfare, austerity, social security, individual responsibility",
author = "Peter Taylor-Gooby and Benjamin LERUTH and Heejung Chung",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1332/030557318X15155868234361",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "97--114",
journal = "Policy and Politics",
issn = "0305-5736",
publisher = "Policy Press",
number = "1",

}

Identifying attitudes to welfare through deliberative forums : the emergence of reluctant individualism. / Taylor-Gooby, Peter; LERUTH, Benjamin; Chung, Heejung.

In: Policy & Politics, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 97-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying attitudes to welfare through deliberative forums

T2 - the emergence of reluctant individualism

AU - Taylor-Gooby, Peter

AU - LERUTH, Benjamin

AU - Chung, Heejung

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - This article uses deliberative forums to examine attitudes to UK welfare futures. It makes methodological, empirical and theoretical contributions to the field. We demonstrate the value of the approach, provide insights into attitudes, in particular about priorities and how people link ideas together, and show how the UK’s neoliberal market-centredness fits with enthusiasm for state healthcare and pensions, desire to close national labour markets to immigrants and approval of government interventions to expand opportunities for those who make the effort. Findings point to the strength of the work ethic and individual responsibility alongside a regret that major and highly valued state services appear unsustainable, the construction of immigrants as simultaneously a burden on provision and unfair labour-market competitors, and backing for the development of a ‘new risk’ welfare state through social investment. The study reveals the complexity of responses to current challenges in an increasingly liberal-leaning welfare state.

AB - This article uses deliberative forums to examine attitudes to UK welfare futures. It makes methodological, empirical and theoretical contributions to the field. We demonstrate the value of the approach, provide insights into attitudes, in particular about priorities and how people link ideas together, and show how the UK’s neoliberal market-centredness fits with enthusiasm for state healthcare and pensions, desire to close national labour markets to immigrants and approval of government interventions to expand opportunities for those who make the effort. Findings point to the strength of the work ethic and individual responsibility alongside a regret that major and highly valued state services appear unsustainable, the construction of immigrants as simultaneously a burden on provision and unfair labour-market competitors, and backing for the development of a ‘new risk’ welfare state through social investment. The study reveals the complexity of responses to current challenges in an increasingly liberal-leaning welfare state.

KW - welfare

KW - austerity

KW - social security

KW - individual responsibility

U2 - 10.1332/030557318X15155868234361

DO - 10.1332/030557318X15155868234361

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 97

EP - 114

JO - Policy and Politics

JF - Policy and Politics

SN - 0305-5736

IS - 1

ER -