I'm just trolling

The role of normative beliefs in aggressive behaviour in online gaming

Zorah Hilvert-Bruce, James T. Neill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Based on the social-cognitive information processing model and the theory of normative beliefs, this study tests if gamers normalise aggression in games, and whether these normative beliefs explain their aggressive behaviour in games. Experimental cross sectional, worldwide data was collected through an online survey of gamers (N = 1646). Participants were randomly assigned to read a vignette describing an instance of verbal harassment occurring either online (within a multiplayer game) or offline (within a board game café) and were asked how acceptable and tolerable they found the harassment. There was a significant moderate main effect of context which indicated that harassment was perceived as more normal in the online gaming scenario. Normative beliefs about cyberaggression significantly predicted both general and prejudiced cyberaggression. Additionally, normative beliefs partially mediated the relationship between age and general cyberaggression (small effect) and gender and general cyberaggression (large effect). As normative beliefs are dynamic and modifiable, cyberaggression prevention and intervention efforts should include modification of beliefs which support the legitimacy and acceptability of cyberaggression in games. These findings provide insight into how gamer culture around acceptability of trash talk relates to toxicity in games and suggest directions for further research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-311
Number of pages9
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume102
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Toxicity
Illegitimacy
Aggression
Automatic Data Processing
Gaming
Research
Harassment
Acceptability

Cite this

@article{3589ecc4256f48518ca8cc1b2e6c63e6,
title = "I'm just trolling: The role of normative beliefs in aggressive behaviour in online gaming",
abstract = "Based on the social-cognitive information processing model and the theory of normative beliefs, this study tests if gamers normalise aggression in games, and whether these normative beliefs explain their aggressive behaviour in games. Experimental cross sectional, worldwide data was collected through an online survey of gamers (N = 1646). Participants were randomly assigned to read a vignette describing an instance of verbal harassment occurring either online (within a multiplayer game) or offline (within a board game caf{\'e}) and were asked how acceptable and tolerable they found the harassment. There was a significant moderate main effect of context which indicated that harassment was perceived as more normal in the online gaming scenario. Normative beliefs about cyberaggression significantly predicted both general and prejudiced cyberaggression. Additionally, normative beliefs partially mediated the relationship between age and general cyberaggression (small effect) and gender and general cyberaggression (large effect). As normative beliefs are dynamic and modifiable, cyberaggression prevention and intervention efforts should include modification of beliefs which support the legitimacy and acceptability of cyberaggression in games. These findings provide insight into how gamer culture around acceptability of trash talk relates to toxicity in games and suggest directions for further research.",
keywords = "Cyberaggression, Cyberbullying, Normative beliefs, Online gaming",
author = "Zorah Hilvert-Bruce and Neill, {James T.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "303--311",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

I'm just trolling : The role of normative beliefs in aggressive behaviour in online gaming. / Hilvert-Bruce, Zorah; Neill, James T.

In: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 102, 01.2020, p. 303-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - I'm just trolling

T2 - The role of normative beliefs in aggressive behaviour in online gaming

AU - Hilvert-Bruce, Zorah

AU - Neill, James T.

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - Based on the social-cognitive information processing model and the theory of normative beliefs, this study tests if gamers normalise aggression in games, and whether these normative beliefs explain their aggressive behaviour in games. Experimental cross sectional, worldwide data was collected through an online survey of gamers (N = 1646). Participants were randomly assigned to read a vignette describing an instance of verbal harassment occurring either online (within a multiplayer game) or offline (within a board game café) and were asked how acceptable and tolerable they found the harassment. There was a significant moderate main effect of context which indicated that harassment was perceived as more normal in the online gaming scenario. Normative beliefs about cyberaggression significantly predicted both general and prejudiced cyberaggression. Additionally, normative beliefs partially mediated the relationship between age and general cyberaggression (small effect) and gender and general cyberaggression (large effect). As normative beliefs are dynamic and modifiable, cyberaggression prevention and intervention efforts should include modification of beliefs which support the legitimacy and acceptability of cyberaggression in games. These findings provide insight into how gamer culture around acceptability of trash talk relates to toxicity in games and suggest directions for further research.

AB - Based on the social-cognitive information processing model and the theory of normative beliefs, this study tests if gamers normalise aggression in games, and whether these normative beliefs explain their aggressive behaviour in games. Experimental cross sectional, worldwide data was collected through an online survey of gamers (N = 1646). Participants were randomly assigned to read a vignette describing an instance of verbal harassment occurring either online (within a multiplayer game) or offline (within a board game café) and were asked how acceptable and tolerable they found the harassment. There was a significant moderate main effect of context which indicated that harassment was perceived as more normal in the online gaming scenario. Normative beliefs about cyberaggression significantly predicted both general and prejudiced cyberaggression. Additionally, normative beliefs partially mediated the relationship between age and general cyberaggression (small effect) and gender and general cyberaggression (large effect). As normative beliefs are dynamic and modifiable, cyberaggression prevention and intervention efforts should include modification of beliefs which support the legitimacy and acceptability of cyberaggression in games. These findings provide insight into how gamer culture around acceptability of trash talk relates to toxicity in games and suggest directions for further research.

KW - Cyberaggression

KW - Cyberbullying

KW - Normative beliefs

KW - Online gaming

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072243581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/im-just-trolling-role-normative-beliefs-aggressive-behaviour-online-gaming

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 303

EP - 311

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

ER -