Impact of terminal digit preference by family physicians and sphygmomanometer calibration errors on blood pressure value

Implication for hypertension screening

Theophile Niyonsenga, Alain Vanasse, Josiane Courteau, Lyne Cloutier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement is important; systematic small errors can mislabel BP status in many persons. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of 2 types of measurement errors on the evaluation of BP in family medicine: errors associated with terminal digit preference and those associated with calibration errors of sphygmomanometers. Secondary data analyses from 2 different projects were used to derive empiric distributions of terminal digit and BP device errors. Taking into account both types of errors, the proportion of false positives (falsely high BP) and false negatives (falsely normal BP) varied between 0.82% and 5.18% of the population of consulting family physicians. In the United States, false positives and false negatives in patients' BP evaluations might lead to overtreating or undertreating 1.15 million to 7.25 million patients. Results support the need for the development of systematic interventions for quality control of BP measurements and periodic retraining for health professionals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-347
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Clinical Hypertension
Volume10
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sphygmomanometers
Family Physicians
Calibration
Blood Pressure
Hypertension
Education, Professional, Retraining
Quality Control
Medicine
Equipment and Supplies
Health

Cite this

@article{339caf2c8b424c70a5a5b6664d59cdc2,
title = "Impact of terminal digit preference by family physicians and sphygmomanometer calibration errors on blood pressure value: Implication for hypertension screening",
abstract = "The accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement is important; systematic small errors can mislabel BP status in many persons. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of 2 types of measurement errors on the evaluation of BP in family medicine: errors associated with terminal digit preference and those associated with calibration errors of sphygmomanometers. Secondary data analyses from 2 different projects were used to derive empiric distributions of terminal digit and BP device errors. Taking into account both types of errors, the proportion of false positives (falsely high BP) and false negatives (falsely normal BP) varied between 0.82{\%} and 5.18{\%} of the population of consulting family physicians. In the United States, false positives and false negatives in patients' BP evaluations might lead to overtreating or undertreating 1.15 million to 7.25 million patients. Results support the need for the development of systematic interventions for quality control of BP measurements and periodic retraining for health professionals.",
author = "Theophile Niyonsenga and Alain Vanasse and Josiane Courteau and Lyne Cloutier",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.06620.x",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "341--347",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Hypertension",
issn = "1524-6175",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

Impact of terminal digit preference by family physicians and sphygmomanometer calibration errors on blood pressure value : Implication for hypertension screening. / Niyonsenga, Theophile; Vanasse, Alain; Courteau, Josiane; Cloutier, Lyne.

In: Journal of Clinical Hypertension, Vol. 10, No. 5, 05.2008, p. 341-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of terminal digit preference by family physicians and sphygmomanometer calibration errors on blood pressure value

T2 - Implication for hypertension screening

AU - Niyonsenga, Theophile

AU - Vanasse, Alain

AU - Courteau, Josiane

AU - Cloutier, Lyne

PY - 2008/5

Y1 - 2008/5

N2 - The accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement is important; systematic small errors can mislabel BP status in many persons. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of 2 types of measurement errors on the evaluation of BP in family medicine: errors associated with terminal digit preference and those associated with calibration errors of sphygmomanometers. Secondary data analyses from 2 different projects were used to derive empiric distributions of terminal digit and BP device errors. Taking into account both types of errors, the proportion of false positives (falsely high BP) and false negatives (falsely normal BP) varied between 0.82% and 5.18% of the population of consulting family physicians. In the United States, false positives and false negatives in patients' BP evaluations might lead to overtreating or undertreating 1.15 million to 7.25 million patients. Results support the need for the development of systematic interventions for quality control of BP measurements and periodic retraining for health professionals.

AB - The accuracy of blood pressure (BP) measurement is important; systematic small errors can mislabel BP status in many persons. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of 2 types of measurement errors on the evaluation of BP in family medicine: errors associated with terminal digit preference and those associated with calibration errors of sphygmomanometers. Secondary data analyses from 2 different projects were used to derive empiric distributions of terminal digit and BP device errors. Taking into account both types of errors, the proportion of false positives (falsely high BP) and false negatives (falsely normal BP) varied between 0.82% and 5.18% of the population of consulting family physicians. In the United States, false positives and false negatives in patients' BP evaluations might lead to overtreating or undertreating 1.15 million to 7.25 million patients. Results support the need for the development of systematic interventions for quality control of BP measurements and periodic retraining for health professionals.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50349094332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.06620.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.06620.x

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 341

EP - 347

JO - Journal of Clinical Hypertension

JF - Journal of Clinical Hypertension

SN - 1524-6175

IS - 5

ER -