Implementing constructive alignment in higher education–cross-institutional perspectives from Australia

Gesa Ruge, Olubukola Tokede, Linda Tivendale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Constructive alignment (CA) has become internationally established as an educational approach linking strategic planning and corporate policy to discipline and course teaching and learning practice. The literature to date has focused predominantly on either single institutional or specific discipline settings and curriculum level initiatives. This research study seeks to broaden the conceptual and methodological perspective on constructive alignment with a cross-institutional study from two Australian universities. The case study learnings from a top-down institutional implementation of CA at one university and the bottom-up teaching and learning approach within the other have been jointly investigated. By mapping the implementation process of constructive alignment, the key strengths and constraints for both approaches have been identified. These findings offer new insights for institutional managers as well as academics and teaching and learning professionals. In addition, a potential ‘gap in the middle’ at faculty level is highlighted. It is within this nexus that the transitions from institutional policy and targets to successful discipline-specific teaching and learning practices and outcomes are shaped. This research seeks to raise the awareness that CA design, planning and implementation should be conceptualised from the outset as a dynamic, multi-directional and iterative process, irrespective of whether a predominantly top-down or bottom-up approach for implementation is chosen.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)833-848
Number of pages16
JournalHigher Education Research and Development
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

learning
Teaching
university
strategic planning
manager
curriculum
planning
literature

Cite this

@article{5ae18d84d4c7440bb1e20ecdda595c8d,
title = "Implementing constructive alignment in higher education–cross-institutional perspectives from Australia",
abstract = "Constructive alignment (CA) has become internationally established as an educational approach linking strategic planning and corporate policy to discipline and course teaching and learning practice. The literature to date has focused predominantly on either single institutional or specific discipline settings and curriculum level initiatives. This research study seeks to broaden the conceptual and methodological perspective on constructive alignment with a cross-institutional study from two Australian universities. The case study learnings from a top-down institutional implementation of CA at one university and the bottom-up teaching and learning approach within the other have been jointly investigated. By mapping the implementation process of constructive alignment, the key strengths and constraints for both approaches have been identified. These findings offer new insights for institutional managers as well as academics and teaching and learning professionals. In addition, a potential ‘gap in the middle’ at faculty level is highlighted. It is within this nexus that the transitions from institutional policy and targets to successful discipline-specific teaching and learning practices and outcomes are shaped. This research seeks to raise the awareness that CA design, planning and implementation should be conceptualised from the outset as a dynamic, multi-directional and iterative process, irrespective of whether a predominantly top-down or bottom-up approach for implementation is chosen.",
keywords = "alignment for learning, Constructive alignment, institutional implementation, student learning outcomes",
author = "Gesa Ruge and Olubukola Tokede and Linda Tivendale",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1080/07294360.2019.1586842",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "833--848",
journal = "HERDSA Review of Higher Education",
issn = "0729-4360",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Implementing constructive alignment in higher education–cross-institutional perspectives from Australia. / Ruge, Gesa; Tokede, Olubukola; Tivendale, Linda.

In: Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 38, No. 4, 07.06.2019, p. 833-848.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing constructive alignment in higher education–cross-institutional perspectives from Australia

AU - Ruge, Gesa

AU - Tokede, Olubukola

AU - Tivendale, Linda

PY - 2019/6/7

Y1 - 2019/6/7

N2 - Constructive alignment (CA) has become internationally established as an educational approach linking strategic planning and corporate policy to discipline and course teaching and learning practice. The literature to date has focused predominantly on either single institutional or specific discipline settings and curriculum level initiatives. This research study seeks to broaden the conceptual and methodological perspective on constructive alignment with a cross-institutional study from two Australian universities. The case study learnings from a top-down institutional implementation of CA at one university and the bottom-up teaching and learning approach within the other have been jointly investigated. By mapping the implementation process of constructive alignment, the key strengths and constraints for both approaches have been identified. These findings offer new insights for institutional managers as well as academics and teaching and learning professionals. In addition, a potential ‘gap in the middle’ at faculty level is highlighted. It is within this nexus that the transitions from institutional policy and targets to successful discipline-specific teaching and learning practices and outcomes are shaped. This research seeks to raise the awareness that CA design, planning and implementation should be conceptualised from the outset as a dynamic, multi-directional and iterative process, irrespective of whether a predominantly top-down or bottom-up approach for implementation is chosen.

AB - Constructive alignment (CA) has become internationally established as an educational approach linking strategic planning and corporate policy to discipline and course teaching and learning practice. The literature to date has focused predominantly on either single institutional or specific discipline settings and curriculum level initiatives. This research study seeks to broaden the conceptual and methodological perspective on constructive alignment with a cross-institutional study from two Australian universities. The case study learnings from a top-down institutional implementation of CA at one university and the bottom-up teaching and learning approach within the other have been jointly investigated. By mapping the implementation process of constructive alignment, the key strengths and constraints for both approaches have been identified. These findings offer new insights for institutional managers as well as academics and teaching and learning professionals. In addition, a potential ‘gap in the middle’ at faculty level is highlighted. It is within this nexus that the transitions from institutional policy and targets to successful discipline-specific teaching and learning practices and outcomes are shaped. This research seeks to raise the awareness that CA design, planning and implementation should be conceptualised from the outset as a dynamic, multi-directional and iterative process, irrespective of whether a predominantly top-down or bottom-up approach for implementation is chosen.

KW - alignment for learning

KW - Constructive alignment

KW - institutional implementation

KW - student learning outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065586904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/implementing-constructive-alignment-higher-educationcrossinstitutional-perspectives-australia

U2 - 10.1080/07294360.2019.1586842

DO - 10.1080/07294360.2019.1586842

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 833

EP - 848

JO - HERDSA Review of Higher Education

JF - HERDSA Review of Higher Education

SN - 0729-4360

IS - 4

ER -