Improved probability of detection of ecological “surprises”

David B. Lindenmayer, Gene Likens, Charles Krebs, Richard Hobbs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

107 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ecological “surprises” are defined as unexpected findings about the natural environment. They are critically important in ecology because they are catalysts for questioning and reformulating views of the natural world, help shape assessments of the veracity of a priori predictions about ecological trends and phenomena, and underpin questioning of effectiveness of resource management. Despite the importance of ecological surprises, major gaps in understanding remain about how studies might be done differently or done better to improve the ability to identify them. We outline the kinds of ecological surprises that have arisen from long-term research programs that we lead in markedly different ecosystems around the world. Based on these case studies, we identify important lessons to guide both existing studies and new investigations to detect ecological surprises more readily, better anticipate unusual ecological phenomena, and take proactive steps to plan for and alleviate “undesirable” ecological surprises. Some of these lessons include: (i) maintain existing, and instigate new, long-term studies; (ii) conduct a range of kinds of parallel and concurrent research in a given target area; (iii) better use past literature and conceptual models of the target ecosystem in posing good questions and developing hypotheses and alternative hypotheses; and (iv) increase the capacity for ecological research to take advantage of opportunities arising from major natural disturbances. We argue that the increased anticipatory capability resulting from these lessons is critical given that ecological surprises may become more prevalent because of climate change and multiple and interacting environmental stressors.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21957-21962
Number of pages6
JournalNational Academy of Sciences. Proceedings
Volume107
Issue number51
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

ecological phenomena
ecosystem
research program
resource management
catalyst
ecology
disturbance
climate change
prediction
detection
plan
world
natural environment
trend

Cite this

Lindenmayer, David B. ; Likens, Gene ; Krebs, Charles ; Hobbs, Richard. / Improved probability of detection of ecological “surprises”. In: National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings. 2010 ; Vol. 107, No. 51. pp. 21957-21962.
@article{aa55892bf0cb4f27bc4ec99dbd7a9da5,
title = "Improved probability of detection of ecological “surprises”",
abstract = "Ecological “surprises” are defined as unexpected findings about the natural environment. They are critically important in ecology because they are catalysts for questioning and reformulating views of the natural world, help shape assessments of the veracity of a priori predictions about ecological trends and phenomena, and underpin questioning of effectiveness of resource management. Despite the importance of ecological surprises, major gaps in understanding remain about how studies might be done differently or done better to improve the ability to identify them. We outline the kinds of ecological surprises that have arisen from long-term research programs that we lead in markedly different ecosystems around the world. Based on these case studies, we identify important lessons to guide both existing studies and new investigations to detect ecological surprises more readily, better anticipate unusual ecological phenomena, and take proactive steps to plan for and alleviate “undesirable” ecological surprises. Some of these lessons include: (i) maintain existing, and instigate new, long-term studies; (ii) conduct a range of kinds of parallel and concurrent research in a given target area; (iii) better use past literature and conceptual models of the target ecosystem in posing good questions and developing hypotheses and alternative hypotheses; and (iv) increase the capacity for ecological research to take advantage of opportunities arising from major natural disturbances. We argue that the increased anticipatory capability resulting from these lessons is critical given that ecological surprises may become more prevalent because of climate change and multiple and interacting environmental stressors.",
author = "Lindenmayer, {David B.} and Gene Likens and Charles Krebs and Richard Hobbs",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1015696107",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "21957--21962",
journal = "National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "51",

}

Improved probability of detection of ecological “surprises”. / Lindenmayer, David B.; Likens, Gene; Krebs, Charles; Hobbs, Richard.

In: National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings, Vol. 107, No. 51, 2010, p. 21957-21962.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved probability of detection of ecological “surprises”

AU - Lindenmayer, David B.

AU - Likens, Gene

AU - Krebs, Charles

AU - Hobbs, Richard

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Ecological “surprises” are defined as unexpected findings about the natural environment. They are critically important in ecology because they are catalysts for questioning and reformulating views of the natural world, help shape assessments of the veracity of a priori predictions about ecological trends and phenomena, and underpin questioning of effectiveness of resource management. Despite the importance of ecological surprises, major gaps in understanding remain about how studies might be done differently or done better to improve the ability to identify them. We outline the kinds of ecological surprises that have arisen from long-term research programs that we lead in markedly different ecosystems around the world. Based on these case studies, we identify important lessons to guide both existing studies and new investigations to detect ecological surprises more readily, better anticipate unusual ecological phenomena, and take proactive steps to plan for and alleviate “undesirable” ecological surprises. Some of these lessons include: (i) maintain existing, and instigate new, long-term studies; (ii) conduct a range of kinds of parallel and concurrent research in a given target area; (iii) better use past literature and conceptual models of the target ecosystem in posing good questions and developing hypotheses and alternative hypotheses; and (iv) increase the capacity for ecological research to take advantage of opportunities arising from major natural disturbances. We argue that the increased anticipatory capability resulting from these lessons is critical given that ecological surprises may become more prevalent because of climate change and multiple and interacting environmental stressors.

AB - Ecological “surprises” are defined as unexpected findings about the natural environment. They are critically important in ecology because they are catalysts for questioning and reformulating views of the natural world, help shape assessments of the veracity of a priori predictions about ecological trends and phenomena, and underpin questioning of effectiveness of resource management. Despite the importance of ecological surprises, major gaps in understanding remain about how studies might be done differently or done better to improve the ability to identify them. We outline the kinds of ecological surprises that have arisen from long-term research programs that we lead in markedly different ecosystems around the world. Based on these case studies, we identify important lessons to guide both existing studies and new investigations to detect ecological surprises more readily, better anticipate unusual ecological phenomena, and take proactive steps to plan for and alleviate “undesirable” ecological surprises. Some of these lessons include: (i) maintain existing, and instigate new, long-term studies; (ii) conduct a range of kinds of parallel and concurrent research in a given target area; (iii) better use past literature and conceptual models of the target ecosystem in posing good questions and developing hypotheses and alternative hypotheses; and (iv) increase the capacity for ecological research to take advantage of opportunities arising from major natural disturbances. We argue that the increased anticipatory capability resulting from these lessons is critical given that ecological surprises may become more prevalent because of climate change and multiple and interacting environmental stressors.

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1015696107

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1015696107

M3 - Article

VL - 107

SP - 21957

EP - 21962

JO - National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings

JF - National Academy of Sciences. Proceedings

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 51

ER -