TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving biodiversity monitoring
AU - Lindenmayer, David
AU - Gibbons, Philip
AU - Bourke, Max
AU - Burgman, Mark
AU - Dickman, C
AU - Ferrier, Simon
AU - Fitzsimons, James
AU - Freudenberger, David
AU - Garnett, Stephen
AU - Groves, Craig
AU - Hobbs, Richard
AU - Kingsford, Richard
AU - Legge, Sarah
AU - Lowe, Andrew
AU - McLean, Rob
AU - Montambault, Jensen
AU - Possingham, Hugh
AU - Radford, Jim
AU - Robinson, Doug
AU - Smallbone, Lisa
AU - Thomas, David
AU - Varcoe, Tony
AU - Vardon, Michael
AU - Wardle, Glenda
AU - Woinarski, John
AU - Zerger, Andre
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Effective biodiversity monitoring is critical to evaluate, learn from, and ultimately improve conservation
practice.Well conceived, designed and implemented monitoring of biodiversity should: (i) deliver information on
trends in key aspects of biodiversity (e.g. population changes); (ii) provide early warning of problems that might
otherwise be difficult or expensive to reverse; (iii) generate quantifiable evidence of conservation successes (e.g.
species recovery following management) and conservation failures; (iv) highlight ways to make management more
effective; and (v) provide information on return on conservation investment.The importance of effective biodiversity
monitoring is widely recognized (e.g. Australian Biodiversity Strategy).Yet, while everyone thinks biodiversity
monitoring is a good idea, this has not translated into a culture of sound biodiversity monitoring, or widespread use
of monitoring data.We identify four barriers to more effective biodiversity monitoring in Australia. These are: (i)
many conservation programmes have poorly articulated or vague objectives against which it is difficult to measure
progress contributing to design and implementation problems; (ii) the case for long-term and sustained biodiversity
monitoring is often poorly developed and/or articulated; (iii) there is often a lack of appropriate institutional
support, co-ordination, and targeted funding for biodiversity monitoring; and (iv) there is often a lack of appropriate
standards to guide monitoring activities and make data available from these programmes.To deal with these
issues, we suggest that policy makers, resource managers and scientists better and more explicitly articulate the
objectives of biodiversity monitoring and better demonstrate the case for greater investments in biodiversity monitoring.There is an urgent need for improved institutional support for biodiversity monitoring in Australia, for
improved monitoring standards, and for improved archiving of, and access to, monitoring data.We suggest that
more strategic financial, institutional and intellectual investments in monitoring will lead to more efficient use of the
resources available for biodiversity conservation and ultimately better conservation outcomes.
AB - Effective biodiversity monitoring is critical to evaluate, learn from, and ultimately improve conservation
practice.Well conceived, designed and implemented monitoring of biodiversity should: (i) deliver information on
trends in key aspects of biodiversity (e.g. population changes); (ii) provide early warning of problems that might
otherwise be difficult or expensive to reverse; (iii) generate quantifiable evidence of conservation successes (e.g.
species recovery following management) and conservation failures; (iv) highlight ways to make management more
effective; and (v) provide information on return on conservation investment.The importance of effective biodiversity
monitoring is widely recognized (e.g. Australian Biodiversity Strategy).Yet, while everyone thinks biodiversity
monitoring is a good idea, this has not translated into a culture of sound biodiversity monitoring, or widespread use
of monitoring data.We identify four barriers to more effective biodiversity monitoring in Australia. These are: (i)
many conservation programmes have poorly articulated or vague objectives against which it is difficult to measure
progress contributing to design and implementation problems; (ii) the case for long-term and sustained biodiversity
monitoring is often poorly developed and/or articulated; (iii) there is often a lack of appropriate institutional
support, co-ordination, and targeted funding for biodiversity monitoring; and (iv) there is often a lack of appropriate
standards to guide monitoring activities and make data available from these programmes.To deal with these
issues, we suggest that policy makers, resource managers and scientists better and more explicitly articulate the
objectives of biodiversity monitoring and better demonstrate the case for greater investments in biodiversity monitoring.There is an urgent need for improved institutional support for biodiversity monitoring in Australia, for
improved monitoring standards, and for improved archiving of, and access to, monitoring data.We suggest that
more strategic financial, institutional and intellectual investments in monitoring will lead to more efficient use of the
resources available for biodiversity conservation and ultimately better conservation outcomes.
KW - conservation effectiveness
KW - management intervention
KW - monitoring
KW - biodiversity
KW - National Biodiversity
KW - Strategy
U2 - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02314.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2011.02314.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1442-9993
VL - 37
SP - 285
EP - 294
JO - Austral Ecology
JF - Austral Ecology
ER -