Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows

A.J. King, B. Gawne, L. Beesley, J.D. Koehn, D.L. Nielsen, A. Price

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    37 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)991-1005
    Number of pages15
    JournalEnvironmental Management
    Volume55
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Monitoring
    monitoring
    programme
    Metadata
    metadata
    adaptive management
    prioritization
    Design of experiments
    Restoration
    river flow
    experimental design
    Managers
    Rivers
    stakeholder
    Industry
    indicator
    Experiments
    experiment
    attribute

    Cite this

    King, A. J., Gawne, B., Beesley, L., Koehn, J. D., Nielsen, D. L., & Price, A. (2015). Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows. Environmental Management, 55(5), 991-1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6
    King, A.J. ; Gawne, B. ; Beesley, L. ; Koehn, J.D. ; Nielsen, D.L. ; Price, A. / Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows. In: Environmental Management. 2015 ; Vol. 55, No. 5. pp. 991-1005.
    @article{9fc01ef111744fc893d4b2bf2d36d5fb,
    title = "Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows",
    abstract = "Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility. {\circledC} 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.",
    author = "A.J. King and B. Gawne and L. Beesley and J.D. Koehn and D.L. Nielsen and A. Price",
    note = "Cited By :18 Export Date: 17 January 2018",
    year = "2015",
    doi = "10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6",
    language = "English",
    volume = "55",
    pages = "991--1005",
    journal = "Environmental Management",
    issn = "0364-152X",
    publisher = "Springer",
    number = "5",

    }

    King, AJ, Gawne, B, Beesley, L, Koehn, JD, Nielsen, DL & Price, A 2015, 'Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows', Environmental Management, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 991-1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6

    Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows. / King, A.J.; Gawne, B.; Beesley, L.; Koehn, J.D.; Nielsen, D.L.; Price, A.

    In: Environmental Management, Vol. 55, No. 5, 2015, p. 991-1005.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Improving Ecological Response Monitoring of Environmental Flows

    AU - King, A.J.

    AU - Gawne, B.

    AU - Beesley, L.

    AU - Koehn, J.D.

    AU - Nielsen, D.L.

    AU - Price, A.

    N1 - Cited By :18 Export Date: 17 January 2018

    PY - 2015

    Y1 - 2015

    N2 - Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

    AB - Environmental flows are now an important restoration technique in flow-degraded rivers, and with the increasing public scrutiny of their effectiveness and value, the importance of undertaking scientifically robust monitoring is now even more critical. Many existing environmental flow monitoring programs have poorly defined objectives, nonjustified indicator choices, weak experimental designs, poor statistical strength, and often focus on outcomes from a single event. These negative attributes make them difficult to learn from. We provide practical recommendations that aim to improve the performance, scientific robustness, and defensibility of environmental flow monitoring programs. We draw on the literature and knowledge gained from working with stakeholders and managers to design, implement, and monitor a range of environmental flow types. We recommend that (1) environmental flow monitoring programs should be implemented within an adaptive management framework; (2) objectives of environmental flow programs should be well defined, attainable, and based on an agreed conceptual understanding of the system; (3) program and intervention targets should be attainable, measurable, and inform program objectives; (4) intervention monitoring programs should improve our understanding of flow-ecological responses and related conceptual models; (5) indicator selection should be based on conceptual models, objectives, and prioritization approaches; (6) appropriate monitoring designs and statistical tools should be used to measure and determine ecological response; (7) responses should be measured within timeframes that are relevant to the indicator(s); (8) watering events should be treated as replicates of a larger experiment; (9) environmental flow outcomes should be reported using a standard suite of metadata. Incorporating these attributes into future monitoring programs should ensure their outcomes are transferable and measured with high scientific credibility. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

    U2 - 10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6

    DO - 10.1007/s00267-015-0456-6

    M3 - Article

    VL - 55

    SP - 991

    EP - 1005

    JO - Environmental Management

    JF - Environmental Management

    SN - 0364-152X

    IS - 5

    ER -