TY - JOUR
T1 - In-depth exploration of ‘therapeutic mealtime experiences’ in inpatient rehabilitation
T2 - mixed-methods multiple case studies
AU - Pashley, Alice
AU - Young, Adrienne
AU - Doig, Emmah
AU - Moore, Janette
AU - Wright, Olivia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose: To explore how mealtime planning and delivery practices in inpatient rehabilitation influence therapeutic mealtime experiences. Methods: This multiple case study used convergent mixed methods analysis of case-specific data across two metropolitan general rehabilitation sites. Interviews, patient reported experience measures, and a chart audit were conducted at two timepoints for participants. Within-case analysis involved descriptive and qualitative analysis, and across-case analysis involved identifying patterns and differences across cases, with findings organised to Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome model. Results: The dining room was the most discussed mealtime structure to promote therapeutic mealtime experiences, enabling access to care, therapy activity, and social engagement. Mealtime structures with built-in flexibility and staff knowing their patients supported tailoring of experiences and enabled person-centred care. Compassionate and attentive interactions with staff created a genuine approach to care, positively influencing patients’ psychosocial well-being. Most patients self-initiated using mealtimes for additional therapeutic activity, but mealtimes were also a time of rest and an opportunity to maintain personhood. Conclusion: Mealtimes have substantial potential to contribute positively to patients’ rehabilitation and offer clinicians opportunities to engage patients in rehabilitation. Flexible mealtime systems enable staff to provide person-centred care, but improvements are needed to ensure this is delivered consistently for all patients.
AB - Purpose: To explore how mealtime planning and delivery practices in inpatient rehabilitation influence therapeutic mealtime experiences. Methods: This multiple case study used convergent mixed methods analysis of case-specific data across two metropolitan general rehabilitation sites. Interviews, patient reported experience measures, and a chart audit were conducted at two timepoints for participants. Within-case analysis involved descriptive and qualitative analysis, and across-case analysis involved identifying patterns and differences across cases, with findings organised to Donabedian’s structure-process-outcome model. Results: The dining room was the most discussed mealtime structure to promote therapeutic mealtime experiences, enabling access to care, therapy activity, and social engagement. Mealtime structures with built-in flexibility and staff knowing their patients supported tailoring of experiences and enabled person-centred care. Compassionate and attentive interactions with staff created a genuine approach to care, positively influencing patients’ psychosocial well-being. Most patients self-initiated using mealtimes for additional therapeutic activity, but mealtimes were also a time of rest and an opportunity to maintain personhood. Conclusion: Mealtimes have substantial potential to contribute positively to patients’ rehabilitation and offer clinicians opportunities to engage patients in rehabilitation. Flexible mealtime systems enable staff to provide person-centred care, but improvements are needed to ensure this is delivered consistently for all patients.
KW - foodservices
KW - goal setting
KW - mealtimes
KW - mixed methods
KW - Rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105007419277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2025.2512055
DO - 10.1080/09638288.2025.2512055
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105007419277
SN - 0963-8288
SP - 1
EP - 15
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
ER -