Inclusion as Deliberative Agency: The Selective Representation of Poor Women in Debates and Documentaries about Reproductive Health

Nicole CURATO, Jonathan Ong

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Mass media play a double-edged role in promoting deliberative democracy: they enforce hierarchies in public discussion by prioritizing the voice of particular groups, yet they remain the best, if not the only institution that can temper inequalities in deliberation, particularly in their capacity to grant ordinary people opportunities for voice in deliberative settings. We put forward two criteria that can assess media’s capacity to enforce inclusiveness in public deliberation. A mediated deliberative system is inclusive if it (1) proactively gives visibility and voice to vulnerable groups to be seen and heard on their terms and (2) allows those with less power to act as “deliberative agents” capable of facing their interlocutors, articulating, defending, and considering one’s views. We provide empirical context to this argument through the case of the Reproductive Health debates in the Philippines, as they played out in two different television genres that differently accentuate deliberative agency.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)576-594
    Number of pages19
    JournalTelevision and New Media
    Volume16
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

    Fingerprint

    deliberation
    inclusion
    deliberative democracy
    health
    mass media
    Philippines
    television
    genre
    Group
    Reproductive Health
    Inclusion
    Documentary

    Cite this

    @article{d52d9f06fbfe48e3a32ec15d4b14c294,
    title = "Inclusion as Deliberative Agency: The Selective Representation of Poor Women in Debates and Documentaries about Reproductive Health",
    abstract = "Mass media play a double-edged role in promoting deliberative democracy: they enforce hierarchies in public discussion by prioritizing the voice of particular groups, yet they remain the best, if not the only institution that can temper inequalities in deliberation, particularly in their capacity to grant ordinary people opportunities for voice in deliberative settings. We put forward two criteria that can assess media’s capacity to enforce inclusiveness in public deliberation. A mediated deliberative system is inclusive if it (1) proactively gives visibility and voice to vulnerable groups to be seen and heard on their terms and (2) allows those with less power to act as “deliberative agents” capable of facing their interlocutors, articulating, defending, and considering one’s views. We provide empirical context to this argument through the case of the Reproductive Health debates in the Philippines, as they played out in two different television genres that differently accentuate deliberative agency.",
    keywords = "deliberative democracy, representation, media ethics, media and minorities, health communication, debate, talk show, documentary",
    author = "Nicole CURATO and Jonathan Ong",
    year = "2015",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/1527476414554401",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "576--594",
    journal = "Television and New Media",
    issn = "1527-4764",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "6",

    }

    Inclusion as Deliberative Agency: The Selective Representation of Poor Women in Debates and Documentaries about Reproductive Health. / CURATO, Nicole; Ong, Jonathan.

    In: Television and New Media, Vol. 16, No. 6, 01.01.2015, p. 576-594.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Inclusion as Deliberative Agency: The Selective Representation of Poor Women in Debates and Documentaries about Reproductive Health

    AU - CURATO, Nicole

    AU - Ong, Jonathan

    PY - 2015/1/1

    Y1 - 2015/1/1

    N2 - Mass media play a double-edged role in promoting deliberative democracy: they enforce hierarchies in public discussion by prioritizing the voice of particular groups, yet they remain the best, if not the only institution that can temper inequalities in deliberation, particularly in their capacity to grant ordinary people opportunities for voice in deliberative settings. We put forward two criteria that can assess media’s capacity to enforce inclusiveness in public deliberation. A mediated deliberative system is inclusive if it (1) proactively gives visibility and voice to vulnerable groups to be seen and heard on their terms and (2) allows those with less power to act as “deliberative agents” capable of facing their interlocutors, articulating, defending, and considering one’s views. We provide empirical context to this argument through the case of the Reproductive Health debates in the Philippines, as they played out in two different television genres that differently accentuate deliberative agency.

    AB - Mass media play a double-edged role in promoting deliberative democracy: they enforce hierarchies in public discussion by prioritizing the voice of particular groups, yet they remain the best, if not the only institution that can temper inequalities in deliberation, particularly in their capacity to grant ordinary people opportunities for voice in deliberative settings. We put forward two criteria that can assess media’s capacity to enforce inclusiveness in public deliberation. A mediated deliberative system is inclusive if it (1) proactively gives visibility and voice to vulnerable groups to be seen and heard on their terms and (2) allows those with less power to act as “deliberative agents” capable of facing their interlocutors, articulating, defending, and considering one’s views. We provide empirical context to this argument through the case of the Reproductive Health debates in the Philippines, as they played out in two different television genres that differently accentuate deliberative agency.

    KW - deliberative democracy

    KW - representation

    KW - media ethics

    KW - media and minorities

    KW - health communication

    KW - debate

    KW - talk show

    KW - documentary

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938396615&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/inclusion-deliberative-agency-selective-representation-poor-women-debates-documentaries-about-reprod

    U2 - 10.1177/1527476414554401

    DO - 10.1177/1527476414554401

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 576

    EP - 594

    JO - Television and New Media

    JF - Television and New Media

    SN - 1527-4764

    IS - 6

    ER -