Incorporating Indigenous values with ‘Western’ conservation values in sustainable biodiversity management

Jasmyn LYNCH, D.G. Fell, S. McIntyre-Tamwoy

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Biodiversity management in Australia is underlain by legislative mechanisms such as the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) and policies such as the national Strategy for the Conservation of Australia's Biological Diversity and the international Convention on Biological Diversity. While these policy directives encompass a range of values and components of ‘biodiversity’, on-ground planning and development assessments often focus only on threatened species and ecosystems as defined in state and national legislation. In regions such as northern Cape York Peninsula, which is managed by the resident Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities as Deed of Grant in Trust (DOGIT), planning for biodiversity management needs to acknowledge the high cultural values of such areas and to encompass Indigenous values and perspectives. A recent study assessed the significant species and habitats of the greater Lockerbie Scrub – the northernmost extent of rainforest in Australia and a region with high species and ecosystem diversity. While it is acknowledged that research into the cultural values of the plant species is preliminary, the minimal overlap between lists of flora from Western (i.e. under legislative mechanisms) and Traditional Owner perspectives suggests that cultural differences in values and perceptions may result in differing conservation management priorities. A more holistic, integrative approach to local and national biodiversity management planning could accommodate multiple perspectives and enable greater environmental and socio-cultural sustainability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)244-255
    Number of pages12
    JournalAustralian Journal of Environmental Management
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    biodiversity
    national strategy
    ecosystem
    holistic approach
    conservation management
    scrub
    rainforest
    strait
    flora
    sustainability
    habitat
    planning
    policy

    Cite this

    @article{ff64ae05dfbd4ab2991745ec42d3dd5d,
    title = "Incorporating Indigenous values with ‘Western’ conservation values in sustainable biodiversity management",
    abstract = "Biodiversity management in Australia is underlain by legislative mechanisms such as the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) and policies such as the national Strategy for the Conservation of Australia's Biological Diversity and the international Convention on Biological Diversity. While these policy directives encompass a range of values and components of ‘biodiversity’, on-ground planning and development assessments often focus only on threatened species and ecosystems as defined in state and national legislation. In regions such as northern Cape York Peninsula, which is managed by the resident Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities as Deed of Grant in Trust (DOGIT), planning for biodiversity management needs to acknowledge the high cultural values of such areas and to encompass Indigenous values and perspectives. A recent study assessed the significant species and habitats of the greater Lockerbie Scrub – the northernmost extent of rainforest in Australia and a region with high species and ecosystem diversity. While it is acknowledged that research into the cultural values of the plant species is preliminary, the minimal overlap between lists of flora from Western (i.e. under legislative mechanisms) and Traditional Owner perspectives suggests that cultural differences in values and perceptions may result in differing conservation management priorities. A more holistic, integrative approach to local and national biodiversity management planning could accommodate multiple perspectives and enable greater environmental and socio-cultural sustainability.",
    keywords = "Indigenous, Aboriginal, Gudang, biodiversity, conservation, environmental management, cultural values.",
    author = "Jasmyn LYNCH and D.G. Fell and S. McIntyre-Tamwoy",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1080/14486563.2010.9725272",
    language = "English",
    volume = "17",
    pages = "244--255",
    journal = "Australian Journal of Environmental Management",
    issn = "1322-1698",
    number = "4",

    }

    Incorporating Indigenous values with ‘Western’ conservation values in sustainable biodiversity management. / LYNCH, Jasmyn; Fell, D.G.; McIntyre-Tamwoy, S.

    In: Australian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2010, p. 244-255.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Incorporating Indigenous values with ‘Western’ conservation values in sustainable biodiversity management

    AU - LYNCH, Jasmyn

    AU - Fell, D.G.

    AU - McIntyre-Tamwoy, S.

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - Biodiversity management in Australia is underlain by legislative mechanisms such as the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) and policies such as the national Strategy for the Conservation of Australia's Biological Diversity and the international Convention on Biological Diversity. While these policy directives encompass a range of values and components of ‘biodiversity’, on-ground planning and development assessments often focus only on threatened species and ecosystems as defined in state and national legislation. In regions such as northern Cape York Peninsula, which is managed by the resident Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities as Deed of Grant in Trust (DOGIT), planning for biodiversity management needs to acknowledge the high cultural values of such areas and to encompass Indigenous values and perspectives. A recent study assessed the significant species and habitats of the greater Lockerbie Scrub – the northernmost extent of rainforest in Australia and a region with high species and ecosystem diversity. While it is acknowledged that research into the cultural values of the plant species is preliminary, the minimal overlap between lists of flora from Western (i.e. under legislative mechanisms) and Traditional Owner perspectives suggests that cultural differences in values and perceptions may result in differing conservation management priorities. A more holistic, integrative approach to local and national biodiversity management planning could accommodate multiple perspectives and enable greater environmental and socio-cultural sustainability.

    AB - Biodiversity management in Australia is underlain by legislative mechanisms such as the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) and policies such as the national Strategy for the Conservation of Australia's Biological Diversity and the international Convention on Biological Diversity. While these policy directives encompass a range of values and components of ‘biodiversity’, on-ground planning and development assessments often focus only on threatened species and ecosystems as defined in state and national legislation. In regions such as northern Cape York Peninsula, which is managed by the resident Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities as Deed of Grant in Trust (DOGIT), planning for biodiversity management needs to acknowledge the high cultural values of such areas and to encompass Indigenous values and perspectives. A recent study assessed the significant species and habitats of the greater Lockerbie Scrub – the northernmost extent of rainforest in Australia and a region with high species and ecosystem diversity. While it is acknowledged that research into the cultural values of the plant species is preliminary, the minimal overlap between lists of flora from Western (i.e. under legislative mechanisms) and Traditional Owner perspectives suggests that cultural differences in values and perceptions may result in differing conservation management priorities. A more holistic, integrative approach to local and national biodiversity management planning could accommodate multiple perspectives and enable greater environmental and socio-cultural sustainability.

    KW - Indigenous

    KW - Aboriginal

    KW - Gudang

    KW - biodiversity

    KW - conservation

    KW - environmental management

    KW - cultural values.

    U2 - 10.1080/14486563.2010.9725272

    DO - 10.1080/14486563.2010.9725272

    M3 - Article

    VL - 17

    SP - 244

    EP - 255

    JO - Australian Journal of Environmental Management

    JF - Australian Journal of Environmental Management

    SN - 1322-1698

    IS - 4

    ER -