Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity

Cameron GORDON, Robert TANTON

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The socio-cultural and economic distributional impacts of transportation projects are key elements of both individual project decisions and transportation policymaking. One of these dimensions, transportation equity, roughly defined as the relative distribution of benefits and burdens of transportation investments, goods and services, is a growing area of both policy and academic concern. Most ‘equity’ measures are ‘objective’ in that they use quantitative metrics of actual burden as seen and defined by outside observers. This article examines a subjective measure of burden (the Subjective Wellbeing Index) which captures how satisfied people are with their lives on a number of domains. While this concept has been used in studies of economic development and general disadvantage, it has never been used before in the context of transport disadvantage. This article will thus accomplish a first by looking at transport costs using a subjective well-being framework using a case study of Australia and the Household Income and Labour Dynamics Survey of Australia (HILDA).
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City
    EditorsLindsay Oxlad
    Place of PublicationOnline
    PublisherQueensland University of Technology
    Pages1-11
    Number of pages11
    ISBN (Print)9781921897825
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    EventAustralasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF 2013) - Brisbane, Brisbane, Australia
    Duration: 2 Oct 20134 Oct 2013

    Conference

    ConferenceAustralasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF 2013)
    CountryAustralia
    CityBrisbane
    Period2/10/134/10/13

    Fingerprint

    equity
    well-being
    study of economics
    household income
    economic impact
    labor
    costs

    Cite this

    GORDON, C., & TANTON, R. (2013). Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity. In L. Oxlad (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City (pp. 1-11). Online: Queensland University of Technology.
    GORDON, Cameron ; TANTON, Robert. / Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity. Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City. editor / Lindsay Oxlad. Online : Queensland University of Technology, 2013. pp. 1-11
    @inproceedings{9a42e46321e8410e99162bbba222d7c6,
    title = "Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity",
    abstract = "The socio-cultural and economic distributional impacts of transportation projects are key elements of both individual project decisions and transportation policymaking. One of these dimensions, transportation equity, roughly defined as the relative distribution of benefits and burdens of transportation investments, goods and services, is a growing area of both policy and academic concern. Most ‘equity’ measures are ‘objective’ in that they use quantitative metrics of actual burden as seen and defined by outside observers. This article examines a subjective measure of burden (the Subjective Wellbeing Index) which captures how satisfied people are with their lives on a number of domains. While this concept has been used in studies of economic development and general disadvantage, it has never been used before in the context of transport disadvantage. This article will thus accomplish a first by looking at transport costs using a subjective well-being framework using a case study of Australia and the Household Income and Labour Dynamics Survey of Australia (HILDA).",
    author = "Cameron GORDON and Robert TANTON",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781921897825",
    pages = "1--11",
    editor = "Lindsay Oxlad",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City",
    publisher = "Queensland University of Technology",
    address = "Australia",

    }

    GORDON, C & TANTON, R 2013, Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity. in L Oxlad (ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City. Queensland University of Technology, Online, pp. 1-11, Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF 2013), Brisbane, Australia, 2/10/13.

    Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity. / GORDON, Cameron; TANTON, Robert.

    Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City. ed. / Lindsay Oxlad. Online : Queensland University of Technology, 2013. p. 1-11.

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity

    AU - GORDON, Cameron

    AU - TANTON, Robert

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - The socio-cultural and economic distributional impacts of transportation projects are key elements of both individual project decisions and transportation policymaking. One of these dimensions, transportation equity, roughly defined as the relative distribution of benefits and burdens of transportation investments, goods and services, is a growing area of both policy and academic concern. Most ‘equity’ measures are ‘objective’ in that they use quantitative metrics of actual burden as seen and defined by outside observers. This article examines a subjective measure of burden (the Subjective Wellbeing Index) which captures how satisfied people are with their lives on a number of domains. While this concept has been used in studies of economic development and general disadvantage, it has never been used before in the context of transport disadvantage. This article will thus accomplish a first by looking at transport costs using a subjective well-being framework using a case study of Australia and the Household Income and Labour Dynamics Survey of Australia (HILDA).

    AB - The socio-cultural and economic distributional impacts of transportation projects are key elements of both individual project decisions and transportation policymaking. One of these dimensions, transportation equity, roughly defined as the relative distribution of benefits and burdens of transportation investments, goods and services, is a growing area of both policy and academic concern. Most ‘equity’ measures are ‘objective’ in that they use quantitative metrics of actual burden as seen and defined by outside observers. This article examines a subjective measure of burden (the Subjective Wellbeing Index) which captures how satisfied people are with their lives on a number of domains. While this concept has been used in studies of economic development and general disadvantage, it has never been used before in the context of transport disadvantage. This article will thus accomplish a first by looking at transport costs using a subjective well-being framework using a case study of Australia and the Household Income and Labour Dynamics Survey of Australia (HILDA).

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 9781921897825

    SP - 1

    EP - 11

    BT - Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City

    A2 - Oxlad, Lindsay

    PB - Queensland University of Technology

    CY - Online

    ER -

    GORDON C, TANTON R. Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity. In Oxlad L, editor, Proceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City. Online: Queensland University of Technology. 2013. p. 1-11