Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity

Cameron GORDON, Robert TANTON

    Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookConference contribution

    2 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The socio-cultural and economic distributional impacts of transportation projects are key elements of both individual project decisions and transportation policymaking. One of these dimensions, transportation equity, roughly defined as the relative distribution of benefits and burdens of transportation investments, goods and services, is a growing area of both policy and academic concern. Most ‘equity’ measures are ‘objective’ in that they use quantitative metrics of actual burden as seen and defined by outside observers. This article examines a subjective measure of burden (the Subjective Wellbeing Index) which captures how satisfied people are with their lives on a number of domains. While this concept has been used in studies of economic development and general disadvantage, it has never been used before in the context of transport disadvantage. This article will thus accomplish a first by looking at transport costs using a subjective well-being framework using a case study of Australia and the Household Income and Labour Dynamics Survey of Australia (HILDA).
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of the 36th Australasian Transport Research Forum ATRF 2013 - Transport and the New World City
    EditorsLindsay Oxlad
    Place of PublicationOnline
    PublisherQueensland University of Technology
    Pages1-11
    Number of pages11
    ISBN (Print)9781921897825
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    EventAustralasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF 2013) - Brisbane, Brisbane, Australia
    Duration: 2 Oct 20134 Oct 2013

    Conference

    ConferenceAustralasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF 2013)
    CountryAustralia
    CityBrisbane
    Period2/10/134/10/13

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Incorporating measures of subjective well being into the measurement of transport equity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this