Increased conditioned pain modulation in athletes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The potential relationship between physical activity and endogenous pain modulatory capacity remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the pain modulatory responses of athletes and non-athletes. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was assessed in 15 athletes and 15 non-athletes at rest. Participation was restricted to pain-free males between 18 and 40 years of age. To measure CPM capacity, a sequential CPM testing protocol was implemented, whereby a test stimulus (pressure pain threshold [PPT]) was presented before and immediately after a conditioning stimulus (4-min cold-pressor test). Pain intensity ratings were obtained at 15-s intervals throughout the cold-pressor task using a numerical rating scale. Athletes demonstrated higher baseline PPTs compared to non-athletes (P =.03). Athletes also gave lower mean (P <.001) and maximum (P <.001) pain intensity ratings in response to the conditioning stimulus. The conditioning stimulus had a stronger inhibitory effect on the test stimulus in athletes, showing enhanced CPM in athletes compared to non-athletes (P <.05). This finding of enhanced CPM in athletes helps clarify previous mixed findings. Potential implications for exercise performance and injury are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1066-1072
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume35
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Athletes
Pain
Exercise
Pain Threshold
Pressure
Wounds and Injuries
Conditioning (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{e51f0e72047b4c0492a52ba80353c520,
title = "Increased conditioned pain modulation in athletes",
abstract = "The potential relationship between physical activity and endogenous pain modulatory capacity remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the pain modulatory responses of athletes and non-athletes. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was assessed in 15 athletes and 15 non-athletes at rest. Participation was restricted to pain-free males between 18 and 40 years of age. To measure CPM capacity, a sequential CPM testing protocol was implemented, whereby a test stimulus (pressure pain threshold [PPT]) was presented before and immediately after a conditioning stimulus (4-min cold-pressor test). Pain intensity ratings were obtained at 15-s intervals throughout the cold-pressor task using a numerical rating scale. Athletes demonstrated higher baseline PPTs compared to non-athletes (P =.03). Athletes also gave lower mean (P <.001) and maximum (P <.001) pain intensity ratings in response to the conditioning stimulus. The conditioning stimulus had a stronger inhibitory effect on the test stimulus in athletes, showing enhanced CPM in athletes compared to non-athletes (P <.05). This finding of enhanced CPM in athletes helps clarify previous mixed findings. Potential implications for exercise performance and injury are discussed.",
keywords = "Pain modulation, conditioned pain modulation, CPM, pain perception, Humans, Exercise/physiology, Male, Young Adult, Pain Threshold/physiology, Athletes/psychology, Adolescent, Physical Conditioning, Human, Adult",
author = "Andrew FLOOD and Gordon WADDINGTON and Kevin THOMPSON and Stuart CATHCART",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1080/02640414.2016.1210196",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1066--1072",
journal = "Journal of Sports Science",
issn = "0264-0414",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "11",

}

Increased conditioned pain modulation in athletes. / FLOOD, Andrew; WADDINGTON, Gordon; THOMPSON, Kevin; CATHCART, Stuart.

In: Journal of Sports Sciences, Vol. 35, No. 11, 06.2017, p. 1066-1072.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Increased conditioned pain modulation in athletes

AU - FLOOD, Andrew

AU - WADDINGTON, Gordon

AU - THOMPSON, Kevin

AU - CATHCART, Stuart

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - The potential relationship between physical activity and endogenous pain modulatory capacity remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the pain modulatory responses of athletes and non-athletes. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was assessed in 15 athletes and 15 non-athletes at rest. Participation was restricted to pain-free males between 18 and 40 years of age. To measure CPM capacity, a sequential CPM testing protocol was implemented, whereby a test stimulus (pressure pain threshold [PPT]) was presented before and immediately after a conditioning stimulus (4-min cold-pressor test). Pain intensity ratings were obtained at 15-s intervals throughout the cold-pressor task using a numerical rating scale. Athletes demonstrated higher baseline PPTs compared to non-athletes (P =.03). Athletes also gave lower mean (P <.001) and maximum (P <.001) pain intensity ratings in response to the conditioning stimulus. The conditioning stimulus had a stronger inhibitory effect on the test stimulus in athletes, showing enhanced CPM in athletes compared to non-athletes (P <.05). This finding of enhanced CPM in athletes helps clarify previous mixed findings. Potential implications for exercise performance and injury are discussed.

AB - The potential relationship between physical activity and endogenous pain modulatory capacity remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to compare the pain modulatory responses of athletes and non-athletes. Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) was assessed in 15 athletes and 15 non-athletes at rest. Participation was restricted to pain-free males between 18 and 40 years of age. To measure CPM capacity, a sequential CPM testing protocol was implemented, whereby a test stimulus (pressure pain threshold [PPT]) was presented before and immediately after a conditioning stimulus (4-min cold-pressor test). Pain intensity ratings were obtained at 15-s intervals throughout the cold-pressor task using a numerical rating scale. Athletes demonstrated higher baseline PPTs compared to non-athletes (P =.03). Athletes also gave lower mean (P <.001) and maximum (P <.001) pain intensity ratings in response to the conditioning stimulus. The conditioning stimulus had a stronger inhibitory effect on the test stimulus in athletes, showing enhanced CPM in athletes compared to non-athletes (P <.05). This finding of enhanced CPM in athletes helps clarify previous mixed findings. Potential implications for exercise performance and injury are discussed.

KW - Pain modulation

KW - conditioned pain modulation

KW - CPM

KW - pain perception

KW - Humans

KW - Exercise/physiology

KW - Male

KW - Young Adult

KW - Pain Threshold/physiology

KW - Athletes/psychology

KW - Adolescent

KW - Physical Conditioning, Human

KW - Adult

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979517885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/increased-conditioned-pain-modulation-athletes

U2 - 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210196

DO - 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210196

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1066

EP - 1072

JO - Journal of Sports Science

JF - Journal of Sports Science

SN - 0264-0414

IS - 11

ER -