Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia

Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency

Julian Murphy, Elizabeth GRANT, Thalia Anthony

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

Abstract

If it is true that public buildings “…reflect the beliefs, priorities and aspirations of a people” (Powell 1995: ix), what do Australia’s public buildings say about Australians? More specifically, what does the design of Australia’s courthouses say about the beliefs, priorities, aspirations and agency of Australian people and in particular, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of contemporary Indigenous Architecture
EditorsElizabeth Grant, Kelly Greenop, Albert Refiti, Daniel Glenn
Place of PublicationSingapore, Singapore
PublisherSpringer
Chapter19
Pages495-525
Number of pages30
Volume1
ISBN (Electronic)9789811069048
ISBN (Print)9789811069031
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

Murphy, J., GRANT, E., & Anthony, T. (2018). Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia: Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency. In E. Grant, K. Greenop, A. Refiti, & D. Glenn (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary Indigenous Architecture (Vol. 1, pp. 495-525). Singapore, Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_19
Murphy, Julian ; GRANT, Elizabeth ; Anthony, Thalia. / Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia : Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency. Handbook of contemporary Indigenous Architecture. editor / Elizabeth Grant ; Kelly Greenop ; Albert Refiti ; Daniel Glenn. Vol. 1 Singapore, Singapore : Springer, 2018. pp. 495-525
@inbook{1a2fb86b860e4c69836e8dd7fbc561ed,
title = "Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia: Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency",
abstract = "If it is true that public buildings “…reflect the beliefs, priorities and aspirations of a people” (Powell 1995: ix), what do Australia’s public buildings say about Australians? More specifically, what does the design of Australia’s courthouses say about the beliefs, priorities, aspirations and agency of Australian people and in particular, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples?",
keywords = "Indigenous Architecture, Aboriginal Architecture, architecture, court design, courthouse design, court architecture",
author = "Julian Murphy and Elizabeth GRANT and Thalia Anthony",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_19",
language = "English",
isbn = "9789811069031",
volume = "1",
pages = "495--525",
editor = "Elizabeth Grant and Kelly Greenop and Albert Refiti and Glenn, {Daniel }",
booktitle = "Handbook of contemporary Indigenous Architecture",
publisher = "Springer",
address = "Netherlands",

}

Murphy, J, GRANT, E & Anthony, T 2018, Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia: Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency. in E Grant, K Greenop, A Refiti & D Glenn (eds), Handbook of contemporary Indigenous Architecture. vol. 1, Springer, Singapore, Singapore, pp. 495-525. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_19

Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia : Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency. / Murphy, Julian; GRANT, Elizabeth; Anthony, Thalia.

Handbook of contemporary Indigenous Architecture. ed. / Elizabeth Grant; Kelly Greenop; Albert Refiti; Daniel Glenn. Vol. 1 Singapore, Singapore : Springer, 2018. p. 495-525.

Research output: A Conference proceeding or a Chapter in BookChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia

T2 - Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency

AU - Murphy, Julian

AU - GRANT, Elizabeth

AU - Anthony, Thalia

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - If it is true that public buildings “…reflect the beliefs, priorities and aspirations of a people” (Powell 1995: ix), what do Australia’s public buildings say about Australians? More specifically, what does the design of Australia’s courthouses say about the beliefs, priorities, aspirations and agency of Australian people and in particular, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples?

AB - If it is true that public buildings “…reflect the beliefs, priorities and aspirations of a people” (Powell 1995: ix), what do Australia’s public buildings say about Australians? More specifically, what does the design of Australia’s courthouses say about the beliefs, priorities, aspirations and agency of Australian people and in particular, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples?

KW - Indigenous Architecture

KW - Aboriginal Architecture

KW - architecture

KW - court design

KW - courthouse design

KW - court architecture

U2 - 10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_19

DO - 10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_19

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9789811069031

VL - 1

SP - 495

EP - 525

BT - Handbook of contemporary Indigenous Architecture

A2 - Grant, Elizabeth

A2 - Greenop, Kelly

A2 - Refiti, Albert

A2 - Glenn, Daniel

PB - Springer

CY - Singapore, Singapore

ER -

Murphy J, GRANT E, Anthony T. Indigenous Courthouse and Courtroom Design in Australia: Case Studies, Design Paradigms and the Issue of Cultural Agency. In Grant E, Greenop K, Refiti A, Glenn D, editors, Handbook of contemporary Indigenous Architecture. Vol. 1. Singapore, Singapore: Springer. 2018. p. 495-525 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6904-8_19