Indigenous Methodology: is it Invented or is it Legitimate?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

With some 25 years exposure within Indigenous Australian Higher Education industry, both nationally and internationally I continue to be dismayed at the colonial attitudes of some scholars, Research Higher Degree supervisors and their institutions. At the opposite end of the spectrum I am also continually invigorated by the achievements and elevated thought processes of other culturally astute Indigenous scholars who seek excellence within a concept of Indigenous methodology, epistemology, pedagogy and ontologies.

Indigeneity has in general been an industry of extraction, exoticness or plagiarism by the academy as some colonial actors benefit from Indigenous knowledge. Even the creation of the ‘Aboriginal Dreaming’, so widely accepted in modernity by both Aboriginal and on-Aboriginal people, is in its essence a colonial construct. It was invented around 1896 by Baldwin Spencer and Francis Gillen, the then Alice Springs Telegraph Stationmaster. Indigenous methodology, is it invented or legitimate? This paper is a summary of the author’s academic interpretation and experiences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-38
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Australian Indigenous Issues
Volume21
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

industry
methodology
epistemology
ontology
academy
modernity
interpretation
knowledge
education
experience

Cite this

@article{560096b0d9854b989061056074c47259,
title = "Indigenous Methodology: is it Invented or is it Legitimate?",
abstract = "With some 25 years exposure within Indigenous Australian Higher Education industry, both nationally and internationally I continue to be dismayed at the colonial attitudes of some scholars, Research Higher Degree supervisors and their institutions. At the opposite end of the spectrum I am also continually invigorated by the achievements and elevated thought processes of other culturally astute Indigenous scholars who seek excellence within a concept of Indigenous methodology, epistemology, pedagogy and ontologies. Indigeneity has in general been an industry of extraction, exoticness or plagiarism by the academy as some colonial actors benefit from Indigenous knowledge. Even the creation of the ‘Aboriginal Dreaming’, so widely accepted in modernity by both Aboriginal and on-Aboriginal people, is in its essence a colonial construct. It was invented around 1896 by Baldwin Spencer and Francis Gillen, the then Alice Springs Telegraph Stationmaster. Indigenous methodology, is it invented or legitimate? This paper is a summary of the author’s academic interpretation and experiences.",
keywords = "Indigenous methodology, invented history, the dreaming, McDonaldisation methodology, emancipation, Indigenist",
author = "Dennis FOLEY",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "20--38",
journal = "Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues",
issn = "1440-5202",
number = "3",

}

Indigenous Methodology: is it Invented or is it Legitimate? / FOLEY, Dennis.

In: Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2018, p. 20-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indigenous Methodology: is it Invented or is it Legitimate?

AU - FOLEY, Dennis

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - With some 25 years exposure within Indigenous Australian Higher Education industry, both nationally and internationally I continue to be dismayed at the colonial attitudes of some scholars, Research Higher Degree supervisors and their institutions. At the opposite end of the spectrum I am also continually invigorated by the achievements and elevated thought processes of other culturally astute Indigenous scholars who seek excellence within a concept of Indigenous methodology, epistemology, pedagogy and ontologies. Indigeneity has in general been an industry of extraction, exoticness or plagiarism by the academy as some colonial actors benefit from Indigenous knowledge. Even the creation of the ‘Aboriginal Dreaming’, so widely accepted in modernity by both Aboriginal and on-Aboriginal people, is in its essence a colonial construct. It was invented around 1896 by Baldwin Spencer and Francis Gillen, the then Alice Springs Telegraph Stationmaster. Indigenous methodology, is it invented or legitimate? This paper is a summary of the author’s academic interpretation and experiences.

AB - With some 25 years exposure within Indigenous Australian Higher Education industry, both nationally and internationally I continue to be dismayed at the colonial attitudes of some scholars, Research Higher Degree supervisors and their institutions. At the opposite end of the spectrum I am also continually invigorated by the achievements and elevated thought processes of other culturally astute Indigenous scholars who seek excellence within a concept of Indigenous methodology, epistemology, pedagogy and ontologies. Indigeneity has in general been an industry of extraction, exoticness or plagiarism by the academy as some colonial actors benefit from Indigenous knowledge. Even the creation of the ‘Aboriginal Dreaming’, so widely accepted in modernity by both Aboriginal and on-Aboriginal people, is in its essence a colonial construct. It was invented around 1896 by Baldwin Spencer and Francis Gillen, the then Alice Springs Telegraph Stationmaster. Indigenous methodology, is it invented or legitimate? This paper is a summary of the author’s academic interpretation and experiences.

KW - Indigenous methodology

KW - invented history

KW - the dreaming

KW - McDonaldisation methodology

KW - emancipation

KW - Indigenist

UR - http://www.swinburne.edu.au/about/our-university/indigenous-matters/research/journal-of-australian-indigenous-issues/

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 20

EP - 38

JO - Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues

JF - Journal of Australian Indigenous Issues

SN - 1440-5202

IS - 3

ER -