Individual differences in online learning

Dominic Upton, Sally Adams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Online learning is becoming ever more important in higher education today. Whilst there is extensive evidence of the benefits of online learning there is less evidence on the types of students that benefit. This study aimed to explore if any variables could predict success and engagement with an online module. A sample of psychology students completed a series of questionnaires prior to undertaking a specially developed online health psychology module. Questionnaires comprised an: academic confidence scale; a computer self-efficacy scale; and a learning styles questionnaire. Reported differences in student performance on, engagement with, and evaluation of, the module related to these variables were limited. However, a relationship between deep learning and a preference for online learning compared to traditional lectures, and a negative relationship between strategic learning style and module design was reported. Overall it appears as if online learning can be accessed by most and there are no indications of one group of students performing inequitably better or worse than others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-145
Number of pages5
JournalPsychology Learning & Teaching. Vol
Volume5
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

learning
questionnaire
psychology student
student
self-efficacy
evidence
indication
psychology
confidence
health
evaluation
performance
education
Group

Cite this

Upton, Dominic ; Adams, Sally. / Individual differences in online learning. In: Psychology Learning & Teaching. Vol. 2006 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 141-145.
@article{62af8398f0394bddb3afa791d539746f,
title = "Individual differences in online learning",
abstract = "Online learning is becoming ever more important in higher education today. Whilst there is extensive evidence of the benefits of online learning there is less evidence on the types of students that benefit. This study aimed to explore if any variables could predict success and engagement with an online module. A sample of psychology students completed a series of questionnaires prior to undertaking a specially developed online health psychology module. Questionnaires comprised an: academic confidence scale; a computer self-efficacy scale; and a learning styles questionnaire. Reported differences in student performance on, engagement with, and evaluation of, the module related to these variables were limited. However, a relationship between deep learning and a preference for online learning compared to traditional lectures, and a negative relationship between strategic learning style and module design was reported. Overall it appears as if online learning can be accessed by most and there are no indications of one group of students performing inequitably better or worse than others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)",
keywords = "3120, 3530 Curriculum & Programs & Teaching Methods, Computer Assisted Instruction*, Individual Differences*, Internet*, Learning*, Personality Traits & Processes, individual differences, online learning",
author = "Dominic Upton and Sally Adams",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "141--145",
journal = "Psychology Learning & Teaching. Vol",
number = "2",

}

Upton, D & Adams, S 2006, 'Individual differences in online learning', Psychology Learning & Teaching. Vol, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 141-145.

Individual differences in online learning. / Upton, Dominic; Adams, Sally.

In: Psychology Learning & Teaching. Vol, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2006, p. 141-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in online learning

AU - Upton, Dominic

AU - Adams, Sally

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Online learning is becoming ever more important in higher education today. Whilst there is extensive evidence of the benefits of online learning there is less evidence on the types of students that benefit. This study aimed to explore if any variables could predict success and engagement with an online module. A sample of psychology students completed a series of questionnaires prior to undertaking a specially developed online health psychology module. Questionnaires comprised an: academic confidence scale; a computer self-efficacy scale; and a learning styles questionnaire. Reported differences in student performance on, engagement with, and evaluation of, the module related to these variables were limited. However, a relationship between deep learning and a preference for online learning compared to traditional lectures, and a negative relationship between strategic learning style and module design was reported. Overall it appears as if online learning can be accessed by most and there are no indications of one group of students performing inequitably better or worse than others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)

AB - Online learning is becoming ever more important in higher education today. Whilst there is extensive evidence of the benefits of online learning there is less evidence on the types of students that benefit. This study aimed to explore if any variables could predict success and engagement with an online module. A sample of psychology students completed a series of questionnaires prior to undertaking a specially developed online health psychology module. Questionnaires comprised an: academic confidence scale; a computer self-efficacy scale; and a learning styles questionnaire. Reported differences in student performance on, engagement with, and evaluation of, the module related to these variables were limited. However, a relationship between deep learning and a preference for online learning compared to traditional lectures, and a negative relationship between strategic learning style and module design was reported. Overall it appears as if online learning can be accessed by most and there are no indications of one group of students performing inequitably better or worse than others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved) (journal abstract)

KW - 3120

KW - 3530 Curriculum & Programs & Teaching Methods

KW - Computer Assisted Instruction

KW - Individual Differences

KW - Internet

KW - Learning

KW - Personality Traits & Processes

KW - individual differences

KW - online learning

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 141

EP - 145

JO - Psychology Learning & Teaching. Vol

JF - Psychology Learning & Teaching. Vol

IS - 2

ER -