Individual responses to climate change: Framing effects on pro-environmental behaviors

Rodolfo Sapiains, Robert Beeton, Iain WALKER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Promoting effective responses to climate change, especially among people who reject its anthropogenic causes, has been challenging. Following a qualitative study, we experimentally induce one of four frames of reference (identity, biodiversity conservation, economic prosperity, and climate change), and assess their effects on participants’ behavioral intentions using three scales (consumption-investment, consumption-reduction, and political participation). The sample (N = 156) included people who thought climate change is natural and those who thought it is human-induced. Results show a significant impact of the identity frame, relative to the climate-change frame, for both consumption scales, in the total sample, and among those who reject the anthropogenic causes. These results offer a way to address behavioral resistances associated with antagonistic views on climate change
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-493
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume46
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Climate Change
Biodiversity
Economics

Cite this

@article{081344c97e6c43ca98ed2d7df8952de8,
title = "Individual responses to climate change: Framing effects on pro-environmental behaviors",
abstract = "Promoting effective responses to climate change, especially among people who reject its anthropogenic causes, has been challenging. Following a qualitative study, we experimentally induce one of four frames of reference (identity, biodiversity conservation, economic prosperity, and climate change), and assess their effects on participants’ behavioral intentions using three scales (consumption-investment, consumption-reduction, and political participation). The sample (N = 156) included people who thought climate change is natural and those who thought it is human-induced. Results show a significant impact of the identity frame, relative to the climate-change frame, for both consumption scales, in the total sample, and among those who reject the anthropogenic causes. These results offer a way to address behavioral resistances associated with antagonistic views on climate change",
author = "Rodolfo Sapiains and Robert Beeton and Iain WALKER",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1111/jasp.12378",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "483--493",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "8",

}

Individual responses to climate change: Framing effects on pro-environmental behaviors. / Sapiains, Rodolfo; Beeton, Robert; WALKER, Iain.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 8, 2016, p. 483-493.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual responses to climate change: Framing effects on pro-environmental behaviors

AU - Sapiains, Rodolfo

AU - Beeton, Robert

AU - WALKER, Iain

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Promoting effective responses to climate change, especially among people who reject its anthropogenic causes, has been challenging. Following a qualitative study, we experimentally induce one of four frames of reference (identity, biodiversity conservation, economic prosperity, and climate change), and assess their effects on participants’ behavioral intentions using three scales (consumption-investment, consumption-reduction, and political participation). The sample (N = 156) included people who thought climate change is natural and those who thought it is human-induced. Results show a significant impact of the identity frame, relative to the climate-change frame, for both consumption scales, in the total sample, and among those who reject the anthropogenic causes. These results offer a way to address behavioral resistances associated with antagonistic views on climate change

AB - Promoting effective responses to climate change, especially among people who reject its anthropogenic causes, has been challenging. Following a qualitative study, we experimentally induce one of four frames of reference (identity, biodiversity conservation, economic prosperity, and climate change), and assess their effects on participants’ behavioral intentions using three scales (consumption-investment, consumption-reduction, and political participation). The sample (N = 156) included people who thought climate change is natural and those who thought it is human-induced. Results show a significant impact of the identity frame, relative to the climate-change frame, for both consumption scales, in the total sample, and among those who reject the anthropogenic causes. These results offer a way to address behavioral resistances associated with antagonistic views on climate change

U2 - 10.1111/jasp.12378

DO - 10.1111/jasp.12378

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 483

EP - 493

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 8

ER -